A problem with internet news is that it can - and is (routinely) tampered with, changed. Worrisome - to me. I see this all the time with the Cincinnati Enquirers' site, as well with the local tv channels. Once a book is out and published that's it. Once a newspaper edition goes to print - that's it - the bell can't be "un-rung." And folks can pass them about, and read them without needing electricity.
But regarding sports pundits - they are what they are. I live in Cincinnati, and read and listen to the "national" bunch mention the B'gal's "high-powered" offense. Not for a while.
Their constant cry of "they need a TE" - for years. Their offensive scheme just does not use one to any degree. They like a blocker, to protect St. Palmer's high-cost fanny. An article about CIN team needs on the CBS Nfl site proclaimed that the TE spot is their most pressing need - and proceeded to state that last year's rookie - Chase Coffman - is a solid backup. He never spent a day on the active roster because of his bum foot and because he evidently couldn't block a determined marshmallow. They tossed him onto IR during the season IIRC.
The local beat writers may be a day or two out of date (rarely, IMO). But they have a feel for the club, a closer hand on the pulse. Wawrow, Graham, Pitoniak, Brown, the BEN writers, et al give a better go of it than the national crowd. Here in Cincy, the beat writers Reedy and Hobson, the previous Mark Curnutte, and the commentator Daugherty deliver the goods. In print.