Kelly to Allen

so we should welcome the invasion because the West needs doctors? Huh??? Your premise isn't even correct. The United States or any other Western nation don't need doctors lol. These are Western academic institutions lol.... Plenty of smart ppl already here for that. So by definition you're undermining our very own elite intellectual capital. You're also undermining black Americans who's History is well documented and need generations to be woven into the elite institutions both in the private or public world.... Besides the illegal and legal invasion isn't about doctors. Almost all are just layman economic migrants, many of them fighting age males. Again the United States is a sovereign nation. It's not a shopping mall to just hang out in

In order for the theory of assimilation to even exist in any capacity, there has to be something to assimilate into .... It also has to be highly regulated and slowly over many generations. This is not immigration or asylum under any coherent definition

This isn't some innocent experience of different people and cultures. This is the conquering of a distinct people... This has nothing to do with food lol If a distinct people in a nation don't have the right and sovereignty over their speech than that becomes an existential issue to the ability to even defend any aspects of their political will.

Diversity is London and Paris being non European and an Islamic Republic lol? What??? Hey we won WW2 guys and Europe is no longer European anymore but at least we have different foods What is wrong with you lol

The question isnt about the moral legitimacy of the third Reich. He's saying we won WW2 and the benefits are European leaders are facilitating it's own destruction. All those souls were lost so Britain could become an Islamic Republic in 10 years lol What Islam couldn't do for a thousand years is happening in one generation.... It's not mutually exclusive So yes I'll defend him. It's perfectly rational Everyone that died in WW2 on the allies side would be completely shocked at the masochistic suicidal nature of the West right now

The Democrats used to believe in Strong Unions Economic nationalism Civil rights for American citizens Strong borders Strong military A very liberal expanded view of free speech And some type of legal rights for gay Americans that wanted to be on the same insurance or whatever. It was also an anti war party They are completely off the rails now. I don't agree with everything on the left but I would beg for the ted Kennedy's of the world to return the Democrats to sanity. I would much rather be debating the school lunch program rather than some lunatic yelling at my kids that maybe they're a different gender It's nuts

What about Peebles? From va tech. He's undersized but a great athlete Farmer has a little bit of Jalen Carter in him. I'm hoping he's there rd 2. Jordan Phillips is a former wrestler and only 20. I definitely think he's on our radar

You're probably right. We can draft Higgins or something and that would be better honestly

I'm not a trump loyalist, but it's pretty weird that would come out now. I'm all for releasing everything. It's never going to happen tho. Besides there's enough open information to understand many of the people involved.

This is probably far-fetched because the left has lost its mind but I have to wonder if this judge purposely gave such an outrageous and ridiculous order that it in essence gave Trump and the executive branch a green light to disobey or at least abstain from what the judiciary was saying. In other words you create a dialectic that's so outrageous in one direction, that when it's disobeyed it has moral legitimacy from the people. this in some sense would empower the executive branch to ignore other aspects of the judiciary because it's so out of control. If the judiciary can be ignored here, it can be ignored on other issues. If you wanted to undermine the judiciary this is exactly the excuse you would create for the executive branch to take more power.... I'm not sure if its fundamentally a good or bad thing because at the end of the day the branches are equal but have different enforcement mechanisms.

Okay we're on the same wavelength. Id argue that the reason trump is using the act is for legal cover because the left isnt following the law. In fact they're doing the opposite. I understand the broad nature of the law and it's implications. I'm not sure what else we're supposed to do from a legal standpoint if many districts, states and institutions are in open defiance to the sovereignty of the United States I have a family member in le so I respect that line of work and understand that life. Sorry if I came across as to confrontational 😉

I guess to try to pin you into a corner because I think you're not trying to be honest ...do you just have a problem with the aliens enemies act from a legal standpoint? If that's your issue I guess I kinda understand sorta. Feels like minutia considering the invasion. It's defacto and asymmetrical attack on the United States sovereignty But if I concede your point on the act, do you otherwise support the United States government deporting non citizens and ending sanctuary cities? If so this is just semantics and you agree with me

And yes it is a defacto act of war to invade a sovereign nation with ten of millions of people. That's why it's a moot point. It's again a moot point It is a defacto act of war to invade a sovereign Nation with tens of millions of people. But getting into the legalese arguments of the alien enemies act has no point regardless because on either side of the argument the president of the United States has a right to deport non-citizens. Enforcing immigration laws actually supports democratic values even though like I said before we don't live in a pure democracy The bottom line is the president of the United States or the executive branch and its departments don't need a declaration of war to simply enforce immigration law

Moot point. Does the president have the right to deport non citizens? We don't need to have a declaration of war to follow immigration laws lol You're saying yes Congress has the laws for immigration. So ask yourself why did the" Democrats" not follow those immigration laws. If tens of millions of people are invading and there are ppl creating sanctuary cities, is that an act of treason and insurrection? These same cities don't allow voter ID, in fact they want illegal aliens to vote lol

If ppl facilitated an invasion of tens of millions of people, and other nations are using it asymmetrically to poison the American people and undermine it's sovereignty, that is an act( the aliens enemies act), that is justified. The United States is not an economic zone or an area with no sovereign legitimacy But it's a moot point. The executive branch doesn't need a declaration of war to follow immigration laws. Deporting non citizens for a multitude of reasons is justified and well within the Constitution. We don't live in a democracy either lol Congress has no legislation that requires non citizens that are here illegally must stay. The immigration laws are already there Does the United States government have the right to deport non citizens Yes or no?

Does the United States govt have the right to say who is allowed in our country? Is it a sovereign nation? The United States is not an economic zone or shopping mall lol. It's not a stock portfolio that anyone can influence

Is there any chance at Omenihu?

I don't think it's ever going to happen man. Too many intelligence agencies involved Maxwell was basically the fall person and it will be swept under the rug...

Interview starts at about 20 minutes https://www.npr.org/2023/06/12/1181675580/epstein-jane-doe-1-290-million-settlement-jpmorgan-chase

I'm not even a big trump guy. Sometimes he's ridiculous to be honest. But Trump is basically a 90s Democrat. The modern left isn't even left anymore. They are full blown clowns who hate Western civilization.

Regan's ideas or at least the influence around him like Milton Friedman were wrong on world trade. All it did is strengthen an adversary in China and deindustrialize the West. It also is simultaneously pushing Russia away from our sphere of influence and into the hands of China. It's also why we can't be more aggressive in undermining irans posture in the region because our doctrine has been aggressively adversarial with Russia who obviously depends on the Persian Gulf for economic security. If your goal is supposedly to isolate Iran or minimize its power in the region, why would your policy do the opposite and push Russia into the hands of China and Iran lol This makes zero sense.... Again unless you are trying to undermine American hegemony.

I can respect that and I understand it. Part of me feels the same way.

They won't answer because many won't tell the real truth about their disdain for Russias posture towards Western Europe or the strategic importance of the Black Sea. The adults in the room always tried to view the Western and Eastern bloc as a " stalemate" pre/ post cold war and the general goal was to ease tensions and develop a economic relationship while maintaining a level of autonomy that Russia shouldn't influence. Question for you " liberals " If you're so concerned about Russia marching through Western Europe, why are so many European leaders, politicians, Western Media, ngos, facilitating an Islamic invasion in the tens of millions into Western Europe? I'm guessing you won't answer and will just call me Islamophobic... The cognitive dissonance is actually not cognitive dissonance. These ppl just want to destroy the West...

He's obviously a little bit nutty but he never should've left. He's was supposed to age into the number 2 role Him and Allen were incredible The greatest era of Bills football was full of diggs type players and huge egos. Like way more intense than the diggs drama ... Guys like Talley, Bennett and Thomas were extremely outspoken and rough around the edges Kelly literally made fun of buffalo before he came here and did crazy stuff. Thurman and Kelly didn't even get along early on.