Homelander

This is MAGA.

The election wasn't stolen, and you know it.

You're spinning hard to justify double standards. No one’s defending looters - what I am saying is that rioting over systemic injustice isn’t the same as storming the Capitol to overturn an election. You’re ranting about EBT and viral videos like they prove some grand conspiracy. Spoiler: they don’t. Anecdotes aren’t policy. And yes, please continue to focus on petty while Trump gives his buddies another tax cut. And yes - coordinated attacks on democracy are a bigger threat to constitutional order than property damage. That’s not “dramatic,” that’s reality. If you can’t tell the difference, maybe take a step back and ask why you’re more outraged by a stolen TV than a stolen election.

Feelings. If you’re calling it “complete nonsense,” then take that up with the IAEA - the international watchdog that verified that Iran was complying with the JCPOA before Trump withdrew. That’s not opinion. That’s the official record from the agency tasked with monitoring nuclear compliance. The JCPOA wasn’t about trusting Iran - it was about verifying and limiting their capabilities: Uranium enrichment capped at 3.67% Stockpile reduced by 97% Two-thirds of centrifuges removed 24/7 monitoring and inspections That’s not “guaranteeing” a bomb. That’s locking Iran into a box where any deviation would be caught - and was, until Trump tore the deal up with no alternative, which led directly to higher enrichment and reduced oversight. If you think blowing up a working agreement and leaving nothing in its place is a smart strategy, you're not defending strength - you're defending failure.

If the goal was to eliminate Iran’s nuclear program, then Trump’s move to scrap the JCPOA achieved the exact opposite - it freed Iran from the limits that had kept enrichment low and under international inspection. Since then, Iran has enriched uranium to 60%, expanded its centrifuge program, and restricted IAEA oversight. So if “slowing it down” was a problem, why support a move that sped it back up with no plan B? The JCPOA wasn’t perfect, but it was working and every major ally and the IAEA said so. Walking away from a verified agreement with no replacement wasn’t strength, it was reckless. Bottom line: If your standard is total elimination of enrichment, then no administration has met it. But only one president blew up a working deal with no backup and left Iran closer to a bomb: Trump.

Thanks for the unhinged rant - it’s a perfect example of deflection and false equivalence. First off, no one is defending looting or property destruction. It’s wrong - full stop. But let’s not pretend random opportunists smashing store windows are the same as a mob storming the Capitol to overturn a democratic election. One is criminal chaos, the other is an organized attempt to dismantle constitutional order. If you can’t tell the difference, you’re either willfully ignorant or just don’t care. You want to talk about "millions of rioters"? Cool. Now show me the convictions. Meanwhile, Trump just pardoned convicted felons who attacked police, broke into Congress, and tried to halt the peaceful transfer of power. As for your tirade about welfare, minorities, and "not working" - congrats, you’ve hit every Fox News talking point in one post. Doesn’t make any of it true. The idea that people protesting injustice are all paid foreign agents trying to burn the country down is pure tinfoil-hat fantasy.

@BillsFanNC VPN is on 🔥 this afternoon. 😅

Oh sure, Iran - an ally of Putin - was just dying to give Biden a diplomatic victory. Do you ever actually stop to think before you type?

No, see - that’s your problem, not mine. You can’t admit the obvious: Trump tore up a working deal just to pander to his base - because it had Obama’s name on it - and to appease the racists, hawks and neocons. You’re not offering solutions either. You’re just dodging, shifting the subject, and throwing out rhetorical fluff because you can’t defend what Trump actually did. Own the failure or stay in deflection mode. Either way, the facts aren’t going anywhere.

This isn’t about me offering a solution - this is about people like you deflecting from reality. Trump pulled out of the only deal that actually limited Iran’s enrichment without offering a single workable alternative. Under that deal, Iran’s uranium stockpile was slashed by 97%, enrichment was capped well below weapons-grade, and international inspectors were on the ground verifying compliance. He walked away from results and handed Iran a green light. See above - you are deflecting from reality. Trump owns this mess - no one else. I know the truth is simple and inconvenient: Trump scrapped a deal that was working, with no backup plan, and it made Iran stronger, not weaker. End of story.

One side tried to overturn a presidential election by storming the Capitol and hunting down elected officials. That’s not a protest - it’s an attempted coup. The rest of your list? Civil unrest sparked by police violence, injustice, or local issues. Not coordinated efforts to end democracy. Stop pretending protests in a city are the same as trying to nullify 80 million votes. You’re comparing apples to Molotov cocktails. Let’s be real - your “Red party, one incident” line is a joke. January 6 was “one incident” the same way Watergate was just a bad night at a hotel. And since we're talking about violence, let’s not ignore the Tops supermarket massacre in Buffalo or the Tree of Life synagogue shooting in Pittsburgh. Who's really fueling the hate and division in this country because it sure isn't coming from protestors demanding justice. Own it.

30 threads on page 1. 19 from @BillsFanNC and @B-Man. 2 from @BillsFanNC VPN buddies. That’s 73% of the board dominated by the same hypocrites. But sure, keep telling us it’s only a problem when others post too much. Apparently, flooding PPP is fine as long as it’s friendly fire.

Lots of words, zero actual reason not to replace the JCPOA. Meanwhile, thanks to Trump tearing it up, Iran’s further in its enrichment than ever. But sure, tell us again how “diplomacy doesn’t work” while offering nothing but vibes and fantasy airstrikes.

The usual Greatest Hits of JCPOA criticism - let’s unpack the MAGA talking points they have been fed. “It had a sunset clause!” - So does literally every arms control deal. It's called diplomacy, not immortality. “It didn’t cover missiles or proxies!” - Because it was a nuclear deal, not a solve-the-Middle East-in-one-treaty deal. Stay focused. “Sanctions relief = funding terrorism!” - You mean the money we froze was given back in exchange for strict nuclear limits? Shocking concept: leverage. And the result of ditching it? Iran's enriching more uranium than ever, closer to a bomb, and with less oversight. But sure, “no deal” was the strong move. Genius.

Why would international tourists come here and spend money?

You say a lot, but you're rarely right. So go ahead - explain how “no deal” was somehow better than the JCPOA. Please site sources to back up your opinions. Per Grok: After the U.S. pulled out in 2018, Iran ramped up enrichment beyond agreed limits. By 2020, their uranium stockpile exceeded 2,400 kg blowing past JCPOA caps. Seems like walking away worked out great, huh?

Putin’s loving every second of this.

Tell us you don’t understand the reconciliation process without actually telling us. Nailed it.