Joe Ferguson forever

It's a global economy. Even caesar trump can't change that.

get rid of the Chinese slave wages and prices for these items increase proportionally to the higher labor costs. and there's no guarantee manufacturing biz owners are going to pay a living wage rather than keep profits. why not just increase the minimum wage for existing jobs? unemployment is low. then you get low prices and better wages. not one or the other.

Yup. The red states are targets. who could've predicted that? unfortunately there's collateral damage. We were just bringing a thank you gift to the owner of the local wine shop who helps with a fundraiser. she said French wine is her biggest profit source - good quality at a good price point. not any more. she thinks she may need to close shop. that would suck https://www.yahoo.com/news/trade-war-could-hit-communities-210143057.html

The post was based on a lie. Why can’t you compete without cheating?

More Nazi tactics: silence the opposition with insults. Fight fire with fire basement dwelling loser. You’ll be first in line to goosestep. But we’re better than the Germans of 1930. Most of us….it was economic turmoil that led to the rise of fascism. Perhaps that’s why trump is tanking the economy. Or perhaps he sees the 59% who can’t find $1000as potential fascists. You’re already there. Got$1000?

So many similarities. It’s almost as if trump read mein Kampf https://www.barrons.com/news/1930s-redux-trump-raises-spectre-of-return-to-dark-days-975275ba

Wow. You actually posted an article labeled misleading and out of context. This is propaganda, pure and simple. Shameless

I love Asheville. But watch trump cut relief funding for the floods.... https://www.mediaite.com/news/house-republican-torched-by-furious-constituents-as-town-hall-goes-off-the-rails-fck-you/

You know, quantum physics requires uncertainty. Are you a particle or a wave? 51 % chance particle, 47% wave. Therefore, mostly particle.

Amazing. We have nuclear scientists, molecular biologists and anesthesiologists on the maga team here yet they're unconcerned with the effects of tariffs on the markets. Meanwhile a couple lawyers, a couple engineers and a physician on the progressive side are concerned. All while the higher educated and more highly reimbursed nationally are becoming progressives in droves. Weird. and 70% seems pretty random. Also stupid…

Then 49.8 % doesn’t put trump in the White House. By definition 51 is more than 47 except for dumb MAGAs. What is your threshold for most? Cuz your opinion is what counts🤓

got a gut virus tommy? Hangover? just a weak stomach? Argue the points. Let's go! Got an hour til my tee time.

I want to know the specifics. If gov't bonds go up, that means more cost servicing the national debt...same with CD's and most "safe" interest bearing investments.

so you timed the market? just remember that you need to time your return into it. you're halfway there. I sense some anger and resentment. perhaps I'm in error.

I think it holds more weight when you show the actual speaker on video

if I was worth $150 mil, I could live with that error. As it is, I can live with that error. If the market doesn't bounce back within a couple years, I will have to live with the error of not pulling out, but much less comfortably. So what are you doing with your market holdings right now? let's see how your prediction works out in 1 or 2 years. Go on record.

your intellectual dishonesty is hilarious if not profoundly sad. you asked for data. I provided it. you reject it out of hand, without data to support your "argument". btw, what does race have to do with it? look it up. As Frank pointed out, there are plenty of whites in that demographic including Vance's family members. losers....As far as why the losers (like you?) changed their party, it's multifactorial but anger, resentment, the longing to believe in an economic and cultural messiah and the belief they have found someone who (pretends to) listen to them all play a role.

Cramer's worth $150 mil. Sometimes the best prognosticators get it wrong. https://www.celebritynetworth.com/richest-businessmen/wall-street/jim-cramer-net-worth/

and that's going to help increase your personal discretionary income how? but you'll "own the libs". Bravo, retribution will be swift and substantial....

They know it - I hope. if not, they're hopeless. Posting a dishonest piece typical of alt right media and getting caught is disgraceful. They've learned from their evil leader - "never admit you're wrong". Of course, the publisher OK'ed every word in the front page story. And of course, the dishonest author of the shyte right blog, read the front page story before posting this bs. This is how they roll... btw, do you remember actually reading a physical paper? I love having coffee and paging through when staying in a nice hotel with a view. You need to turn the front page to get to the editorials....Bman likely has never done that?

well no. that would be 51/49. this was 51/47. but your analogy is more apt for the popular vote for president. they played a role especially in places like Fla or Texas. But there are many Hispanic voters in that earnings demographic. I might even say most but I'm not certain it's over 51%. We'll leave that to Doc Brown. Neverthelessless, there are more voters making less than 100k than there are purely hispanic voters. please fact check me, doc!

51 is more than 47. by a margin significantly greater than that which the president was elected. it's arguable whether that demographic won it for him. That Trump won 77,284,118 votes, or 49.8 percent of the votes cast for president. That is the second highest vote total in U.S. history, trailing only the 81,284,666 votes that Joe Biden won in 2020. Trump won 3,059,799 more popular votes in 2024 than he won in 2020 and 14,299,293 more than he won in 2016. He now holds the record for the most cumulative popular votes won by any presidential candidate in U.S. history, surpassing Barack Obama. Running three times for the White House obviously helps. Kamala Harris won 74,999,166 votes or 48.3 percent of the votes cast. That was 6,285,500 fewer popular votes than Biden won in 2020, but 774,847 more than Trump won in 2020.

17 The number of points that voters who make less than $100,000 a year shifted in Trump's favor. The country is in a political realignment with working-class voters moving even more in Republicans' favor and wealthier and more educated voters moving in Democrats' direction. Four years ago, Biden won voters who make less than $100,000 a year, 56%-43%, but Trump won them 51%-47% in this election. On the flip side, in 2020, Trump won those making $100,000 a year by 12 points four years ago, and Harris won them this time by 4. from npr https://www.npr.org/2024/12/27/nx-s1-5222570/2024-politics-recap

This link actually says 59% https://www.cbsnews.com/news/saving-money-emergency-expenses-2025/ I said "mostly voted for trump". Look at the voter demographics from 2024

That's because you and the "we" responsible for this yellow journalistic garbage supposedly didn't bother to look at the front page article that links the publisher's letter somehow (doesn't surprise me that you didn't fact check what you shared). !/2 truths are untruths...but that's who you are.