Billz4ever

It's not about the past. I don't speak for everyone, but I'm sure the majority of Bills fans are incredibly grateful for what he's done for this organization and how he was able to bring us back into postseason contention from the depths we were for so many seasons. The question we must ask ourselves now is do we think he's the guy that can get us to the promised land based on what we've seen the last few seasons. If you still think he can, go with that. Some people have a different take seeing as how we're going in the wrong direction in the post season. Reaching the AFCCG and then getting bounced in the Divisional round two consecutive years now, this year being in particularly embarrassing fashion, leads some people to the conclusion that he's taken this organization as far as he can.

I actually get a kick out of some of the things he tweets and I think a lot of it is just for the clicks and the attention. This one is an extremely bad take though as you said.

I'd be willing to give him the deal we gave Milano. I think he's earned that. I think he knows he can get a lot more on the open market and think that's what he's going to want. Can't really blame him. He's getting what he thinks he can get. I think that's a little beyond what we should be doing.

That's why I'm very reluctant to get into a long-term contract with Edmunds that's in the $15M to $20M per year range. Having that kind of money tied up in 3 players on the defensive side of the ball is a hard pill to swallow.

Support whomever you want. That's your right and my tweet isn't meant to be a critique of the former President at all. It was simply to add context to who these people are who are saying these wacky things about Damar and what they've said in the past.

Yep, that one.

Not trying to bring politics into this, just trying to add a little context to what we're looking at with those tweets... They are the same Q nuts who were claiming the former president was going to be reinstated. Take that for what it's worth.

OK, fella. Enjoy. I'm done with the annual "we need a new RB" discussion that happens at the end of every season. Be sure to let me know when that happens.

I don't have an obsession with Cook and I'm also not so ignorant as to call him a bust like you did.

I'm sure Beane already had the things we're talking about now (like restructuring) for this offseason prepped and ready to go last season. These GMs are always planning several seasons down the road. Obviously, he has no idea what the cap will actually be years in advance, but he can make educated projections from what he's hearing, and base what he's going to have to work with off of that. People need not freak out over what our cap numbers look like in future seasons based on the cap for the current season. We may question some of the draft picks this team has made, but one thing I'm very confident in Beane in is with managing the numbers.

Good luck with your obsession with running backs and thinking that's the glaring issue with this offense. I have a feeling you're not going to be happy with this offseason.

You're sounding like you don't even watch this team.

No we won't because that's not Dorsey's style. Are you bros with Dorsey and he told you this in private? Have you ever watched a Dorsey presser? He's always asked about running the ball and he thinks they are running the correct amount.

If you haven't noticed, we don't run the ball much, so trying to compare us to a different team is literally apples and oranges. To waste high draft capital on that again this year, when the glaring needs are the line and a legit target opposite Diggs is insane. It's incredible that there's people whose big takeaway from the drubbing we just took is that we need to draft a RB.

Frazier is still calling the D. It's far too predictable and far too conservative.

I don't get where these calls to spend a high draft pick on a RB or splurge on a FA RB are coming from. Improve the line, our run game improves along with it. IMO, Cook showed good progression all season once he started getting some decent snaps. Our glaring need is clearly WR2 and the O-line. If we don't fix those, who's in the backfield makes little difference. LMAO, crazy isn't it.

Cook's proven incapable of what? The guy has shown steady progression all year once he finally started getting some playing time. See what's going on with Diggs right now? None of that changes unless we get someone who can legit take some attention away from him on the other side. WR2 and the O-line is the highest priority unless you like seeing Diggs blanketed, Davis dropping balls, Josh running for his life, and a lack of openings for our backs. You never had one apparently.

Cook was a 2nd round pick, who showed good progression all year the more playing time he got. To throw another high pick at a RB, when the glaring needs on this offense are WR2 and OL is not wise. The line gets better, Cook also gets better. It doesn't matter who you're putting in the backfield if the blocking isn't there. Any RB that's back there is being setup to fail without decent blocking.

No RB we put back there is going to dazzle until we fix the O-line. We need a legit WR2 and to fix this line. Cook is capable of being our feature back in this style of offense if we can finally get some good blocking rather than having running plays blown up in the backfield.

No, no, and no. There is no justifying taking a RB in this draft, when the glaring needs on offense are clearly WR2 and the OL. Drafting another RB when we drafted a very capable one in the second round last year, who made clear progress this season and will be even better next season with some better blocking in front of him, would be a complete waste of a pick.

Why would we draft a RB over a WR? We do not have a legit WR2 right now and that's hurting our WR1. This draft should be WR and OL exclusively. We fix those and we take some attention off Diggs, give Josh time to throw, and actually open holes for Cook, who is capable of being our feature back, especially if he adds some weight this off-season. What? LMAO

The only thing that realistically happens this year is we have a change in coordinators, and even then it may only be DC if we're lucky. Dorsey did a decent job in his first year but seemed to be lacking in situational football play calling all season. When it's 3rd and 2, you shouldn't be calling 40-yard throws. I would love to see Reich return home. I think he has a good track record as OC and would be able to reel Josh back in if he gets into hero ball mode. I think Dorsey's playcalling tends to feed Josh's bad habits at times. I think it's a no-brainer we need something different on the defensive side. Frazier is waaaay too predictable and the bend but not break has been breaking.

We need a legit WR2 more than we need a RB. And OL help as you said. If we fix the OL, Cook is more than capable of being our feature back.

There seems to be a lot of groupthink in this organization. Ed will finally have that breakthrough season we've been waiting for, Davis is a legit #2, McKenzie is a capable slot, the O-line is good enough, and on and on. It's like they convince themselves of these things, but none of them are really based in reality.

Yep, this D-Line rotation thing simply sucks up roster spots to swap around what are mostly mediocre players. Keep the few decent ones and re-direct that money where it needs to be...the O-line. Any future DL signings needs to focus on quality, not quantity.