Einstein

This Eagles team was COMPLETELY rebuilt in 3 years. We are going into year 6.

You seem to not like much of what I post. Why not just "ignore" me so you don't continue to get aggravated? Click this link, then add my username and you won't have to read my posts anymore: https://www.twobillsdrive.com/community/ignore/

63 years and waiting. It takes a toll.

Not yet anyway.

That's the age old question. Did the player not beat out the competition, or did the evaluators fail at evaluating who the better player was? Lets not forget that this is the same coach that traded the Patrick Mahomes pick (or are we still pretending that Whaley did that?), moved Wyatt Teller for a bag of balls, and have wasted numerous defensive draft picks.

It is no way a fake stat. Per snap data is common in statistical analysis. Its really the ONLY way to analyze a player when they have not been given an opportunity. It shows what they have done with the limited amount of opportunity they have been given. Everyone knows the limitations of the stat and the adjust their expectations accordingly. I'm sorry you didn't know this but it doesn't make it absurd. PS, I don't want to spam the board with this debate so I wont respond anymore. You can have the last word.

I said his per-snap production is the best of all the Bills receivers. That doesnt mean he is the best WR. It means it warrants a closer look. It means it warrants more playing time to see if his production stays as good over more snaps. And guess what? He got more playing time with the Giants and his production stayed good. Because of the lack of opportunity. It's so ridiculous for you to even write that.

Because of a lack of opportunity. His time on the Giants has proven that. Im not saying Hodgins is Brady quality, but your way of thinking is analogous to saying "Brady shouldn't start for the Patriots in 2001 because he was a zero for them in 2000." Well, yeah, he wasn't given the opportunity.

I genuinely have no idea how you got that impression based on what I said. But being that you did, let me attempt to rephrase so as to avoid confusion. The idea that Hodgins shouldn't have seen the field because we have a WR group behind Diggs of McKenzie, Kumerow, and Davis is silly to me. Would a line-up of Diggs, Davis, Hodgins and McKenzie be any worse? Likely not. PS, if you want to talk to people who actually think Hodgins is better than Davis. 2022 PFF Rankings: Isaiah Hodgins 76.6 Gabe Davis 65.8 Isaiah McKenzie 64.2 And I don't agree that Hodgins will perennially be a roster cut. I think he is firmly on the 53 now.

So... which number was manipulated? The answer is none of them. I think you're just surprised that his per snap production is as high as it is. No one is saying Hodgins is as good as Diggs. What is being stated is that when he was given an opportunity, Hodgins produced. And the numbers show it. So to give him less than 20 snaps in a season where you had two WR's on IR, another WR whose hands resembled bricks, and Mckenzie.... is odd.

His numbers per snaps with the BILLS, were higher than every other WR on the team. When he saw the field in a Bills uniform, he put up greater numbers than every other WR on the Bills squad per snap. And its not as if we have Cinci's WR core. We have a middling WR group outside of Diggs. The idea that Hodgins shouldn't have seen the field because McKenzie or Kumerow or Davis is silly to me. And the numbers prove it.

See my post above. He had more receptions and more yards per snap (opportunity) than every WR on the Bills (when with the Bills). If you include his Giants time, he has more receptions and more yards per reception than every WR on the Bills except Diggs.

Is he though? Based on what? Just because the coaches wouldn't give him an opportunity? Look at what he did when he got an opportunity... Hodgins: 0.3 receptions, 2.5 yards per snap Diggs: 0.1 receptions, 1.7 yards per snap Davis: 0.05 receptions, 0.9 yard per snap McKenzie: 0.07 receptions, 0.9 yard per snap Per snap in Buffalo (opportunity), Hodgins outperformed EVERY RECEIVER (at the least the top 4) on the team! What more did he need to do in order to receive a greater opportunity? When given a very limited chance, he performed. So how can we say he is an average WR? Based on what exactly? ------ Edited to add: if you include his Giants statistics per snap, his numbers go down a bit with a much larger snap count, but it STILL outperforms all but Diggs on a per-snap basis.

Kinda hard to have better than 4 for 42 when the coaching staff isn’t playing you.

There is definitely some smoke here. Not sure what the issue is but there is definitely a problem.

It is fair. - Belichick won 3 COTY awards while never having a losing season. - Vrabel won COTY while after a AFCCG season. - Harbaugh won COTY after a 10-6 season. - McVay won CTOY while going to the Super Bowl.

Indeed.

Sometimes. But Belichick has also won coach of the year 3 times during the Patriots dynasty reign. They were never bad

Daboll won an award in his first year that Mcd hasn’t in 6 tries.

Yeah, this is the problem.

Hello Guilio. I am 6 foot, 300lbs. Not listing my name, simply because I don't want anyone Google'ing me . I am a CEO and I played football at a competitive level in my younger years but my body feels old now, though my brain does not. I have a home in NY and another in Florida.

Which, to most people, would mean less (as far as heartbreak goes) than a parent or grandmother dying. PS, she was at PSE every day. Not One Bills Drive. PSE is in downtown Buffalo.

I think if we’re all being honest we noticed him go back to rookie season Groot when Von went down.

Thank you for the gentle reminder. I will say a prayer for your wife right now.

This honestly has nothing to do with the Bills play on the field and correlating it is kind-of gross. Yes, Kim was loved. But players often have their best games and seasons after their parent has died. Or grandmother. Or owner (in the case of Myra Kraft).