Einstein

It's exceptionally difficult to understand one's position when you waste so much of your time mischaracterizing what they are saying, misapplying other posters words to their own, and approaching the person with a hostile attitude. The vast majority of what you have written below, and I have corrected, fit the above bill. You have failed to engage in a constructive dialogue, instead resorting to defensive posturing that only serves to escalate tensions and misunderstandings. By focusing on attacking rather than understanding, you not only stifle the potential for meaningful conversation but also risk alienating those who might otherwise be inclined to listen and contribute positively. It's crucial to approach discussions with an open mind and a willingness to consider perspectives different from our own. By "this", you are referring to the time-share style presentation the Bills have opted to present in order to sell PSL's. You seem to be conflating the successful sale of PSLs with the sales approach itself being above criticism. This is a flawed comparison, akin to comparing apples to oranges. The eventual sell-out of PSLs is almost a given, irrespective of the sales tactics employed. However, the Buffalo Bills' decision to adopt a timeshare-like approach for their presentation is notably problematic. Such a method is distinctively unappealing and has its own set of issues, which does not, however, inherently impact the ultimate sale of PSLs. Your equation of these two aspects is perplexing, as the effectiveness of a sales strategy should not be solely judged by its end result but also by the process and experience it entails for potential buyers. In my opening statement, I highlighted how you mistakenly attributed other commenters' statements to me. Here's a prime example of that. I never used the term "investment" in any of my contributions. Instead, my discussions have consistently focused on the rapid depreciation of PSLs. They should not be considered an investment by any means. They are not a good investment, or a bad investment. They are simply not an investment at all, as an investment is a mechanism used for generating future income. PSL's, outside of an extremely rare circumstance, do not offer that potential. Your comparing apples to orange again. The conversation about rationalization (and therefore Stockholm) explored the various ways individuals react to adverse situations. Some choose to confront, others withdraw, while some rationalize to make sense of their predicament. This rationalization is a defense mechanism, a way to justify contentious situations with seemingly logical explanations, avoiding the real reasons to make them seem less daunting. In the context of PSLs, this rationalization manifests when individuals justify the financial burden placed on taxpayers by viewing it through the lens of broader, supposedly understandable changes in NFL business practices, suggesting these changes are just part of the evolving landscape and should be accepted. This has nothing to do with equating the successful sale of PSLs across the league to my comments on how individuals psychologically cope with such financial strategies. I never complained about the 75% renewal rate. I simply analyzed it for what it was - 1 out of every 4 customers are saying "no". I do agree that you and others have a fair hypothesis that a portion of the 25% who are not renewing will renew at a lower price, however there is no real evidence to support that. It just 'sounds' right, which is fine. Unlike you and Kirby, I do not believe for one second that the Bills want to lose 1 out of every 4 customers. That is silly and absurd. It is a good problem to have to have too many customers. The Bills did NOT go into this sales process thinking "our stadium is smaller now, therefore lets go out and lose 25% of our customers". I assure that didn't happen and is beyond ridiculous to think. People often see what they want to see. For you, the above is the result of your emotional reaction to any post that is not pro-Bills. It is apparent that any critique of the Bills quickly draws your opposition, as evidenced by your routine use of disagreeing emojis on every post across the forum that don't align with a pro-organization view. This reaction seems to stem from a deep emotional connection to the team, influencing how you interpret and respond to differing opinions. Contrastingly, my approach to this discussion is driven by analysis, seeking to understand and question the underlying aspects of the situation without bias. I aim to differentiate between what makes sense and what doesn't, based on logical reasoning rather than team allegiance. This method of engagement is not about taking sides but about fostering a deeper understanding of the issues at hand.

Picked up this Josh Allen pennant from Wegmans today as well.

I get it. I was a Diggs fan too. If I could replay that 2020 year over and over again, i’d die a happy man. But he deserves the crap he got from the media. He caused it. He is his own worst enemy. He lost me for good with that crap he pulled with Allen on Twitter. Allen is everything you write about Diggs, but WITHOUT all the self induced negatives. I swing to defend Allen - not Diggs.

Get ready for: ”other teams do it too, therefore it is okay” ”ya want the team? deal with the prices” ”shut up and pay” For what it’s worth, I agree with you. This whole timeshare style sales process is ridiculous.

He did these things you mention. but it certainly wasn’t “all” he did. - He also yelled at Allen on the sidelines of a playoff game. - He also left the stadium after a playoff game without saying goodbye to any teammates or coaches. - He also left minicamp causing McDermott to say he was “very concerned”. - He also implied that Allen’s success was due to him, just days ago on twitter. - He also made numerous cryptic comments. - He also got Beane to trade him. Which, if all he did was “work hard, produce, and elevate the level of the team”, wouldn’t have happened. The media doesn’t just throw dice to pick a random player to make up narratives about. Are they making up narratives about Shakir? Cooper Kupp? Jefferson? Amon Ra St Brown? No. They follow stories and have been known to embellish, yes. But Diggs gave them PLENTY to run with and embellish.

That's exactly what he is saying. It is what happened in NY. PSL owners got "stuck" with their PSL's and can't off-load them because they're practically worthless. So they sell the individual tickets online. Eventually many PSL owners default on their payments, creating more PSL's on the market (this time sold by the team). But no one wants team bought tickets because they're selling on the resale market for penny's on the dollar. And then there is the 5k or so holdover individual tickets that the team doesnt sell as seasons.

This is exactly right. And it plummeted the PSL market.

Agreed. We have a much smaller market.

This is undoubtably true in my opinion. A 60,000 seat stadium in Buffalo will sell out. But that has nothing to do with PSL prices.

Yes. And keep in mind "wait lists" is primarily marketing. Washington boasted of their HUGE wait list for over a decade. Then the Washington Post did an expose that exposed that it was all a sham.

In 2010, the Jets waiting list was over 10,000 deep. PSL's sold for $25,000 each at the 50 yard line. 7 years later, those same $25,000 PSL's were for sale for $4,500. That's only 2 years after going 10-6. Economics is undefeated.

You should be able to get around 25-40% of what you paid for them at the 5 year mark.

Definitely never said that. They will sell it out. Could be. PSL’s will plummet regardless. Jets had a 10,000 person waiting list a couple years ago while PSL’s were selling for penny’s on the dollar. One problem with resale, outside of no intrinsic value, is that people don’t want to go get a $10k personal loan for used PSL’s that now have less time remaining of them.

Now that’s funny.

A few years back I had a visitor that wanted to see some table slamming (like it's a tourist attraction. We looked all over and wondered the lots and couldn't find any. I know it happens but it wasn't easy to find in my experience.

I must be sitting in the wrong sections, because Bills games are pretty tame. Especially compared to what they used to be. You used to see the yellow jackets swarming sections and breaking up fights and escorting people out all over the stadium. I rarely ever see that any more.

Translation: Bend over. You are buying something of no value. Reminds me of the Dr. Seuss movie where a character was selling bottled air.

Fred Jackson. He deserved a playoff team. And the way he was cut with that Weasel general manager lying to him.

https://www.twobillsdrive.com/community/topic/253958-beane-press-conference-4pm/?do=findComment&comment=9008015

If Andy Reid is on the sideline for us next season i'm going to feel pretty good about our chances.

Just had time to sit down and calculate this. So there are obviously 31 other NFL teams to which Diggs could potentially be traded. And each team has more or less a draft pick for each round, so lets assume 7 draft picks each. That's a total of 217 draft picks (31 teams * 7 picks each). 1/31 * 1/217 (due to not knowing which teams draft pick) = 0.00014865467 So that tweeter correctly guessing the right team and right round of the draft pick has a probability of 0.0149%. Or if we assume they guess the right team first and then just have to guess the draft pick we have 1/31 * 1/7 = 0.00460829493 or 0.461%.

I'm not sure if you're saying I did a good job or a bad job haha. If it's the latter, please feel free to correct me. I did my best to give a summary.

Twitter: Is Stefon Diggs the reason for Josh Allen's success? Random person replies: Diggs is great, but he is not the only reason for Allen's success. Diggs replies: You sure about that? If that is the type of stuff he will say in public, I cant imagine how he acts behind closed doors. You dont throw your QB under the bus like that.

The comment he made about Josh yesterday was enough for me.

Im not listening. Was it more of a "we let Josh know beforehand" or "Josh signed off on it" before hand?