Jump to content

Iiiiiiiiive Got a Feeeelin

Community Member
  • Posts

    290
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Iiiiiiiiive Got a Feeeelin

  1. if you check out their fan page the refs have been against them for years now
  2. Yeah I mean just watch how they're used. Laporta is a deep target threat, Kincaid gets 7 yards a catch. Pretty simple
  3. Had some idiot Cowboys fan who tried to talk sh*t on saturday then when talking to him i had to explain to him that the Cowboys are in the NFC east. He just assumed they were in the South division caus theyre from texas....f-n cowboys fans amirite??
  4. braising in that foul brew. let em have it. so gross
  5. WOW!!!! just wow. havent seen a run game like that since...Shady??
  6. Seems like mahomes shoulda gotten the bigger fine after having to be physically restrained from doing something or other to a ref on the sidelines then apparently chased them into the tunnel after the game to voice his concerns. His actions all around were way worse than Reid but I suppose the buck stops with the HC. Or Pat is still the golden boy... Not holding my breath but I hope the Chiefs get the Jerry Hughes treatment from the refs after this and they f-n should
  7. Then the ravens and us. No slouches for the rest of the season. Tuas gotta be sweatin
  8. This one was a head scratcher..bit at least an example of a WR checking with a ref to be sure they're in position. However this time the ref turned around and absolutely hosed him. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XD1yfYZChP8&pp=ygUZQ29tbWFuZGVycyB3ciBvZmZzaWRlIHJlZg%3D%3D
  9. What im saying is McD has a history of these inexplicable timeouts and this one was a real head scratcher when it happened, like i said go back and rewatch and give me your opinion and the unnecessary aggresiveness is also about right for the gdt
  10. which we squandered. the same McD sh*t over and over again
  11. it was a waste of a Timeout after a second down play go back and watch the replay
  12. McD also called a meaningless one right before that Hyde injury
  13. yes which why i specified that it wasnt the hyde TO i was talking about
×
×
  • Create New...