Virgil

Every year, I stick to the rule that we can't draft the same person twice. As of right now, we know that Mitchell is who we would take. Now we are seeing what plan B would become. I've also decided we are going to end up in an Elam/Benford situation. We will draft a WR high, but our 6th round receiver will end up being the man

I agree that we may not be as good as last offseason, but I also think most teams took a step back and the playing field will be level. What's tough for me is there's not a lot of good value between picks 20-60. So you are either going to reach, or lose to teams who reached.

The Bills trading back is the #2 vote getter and it's getting close. If anyone has trade offers to the Bills, please PM to me directly.

@section122 I forgot to mention, we can’t draft the same player twice. Can you please remove AD Mitchell? We already know that’s the preferred pick, so this is meant to be what our second option would be. My apologies for not mentioning that sooner This is why I think the Bills like Franklin from Oregon. His tape looks fairly similar to Diggs IMO The players Carolina wanted are gone. We tried to trade up, but were denied. At this point, we’d have only cared to get a 5th year option on a QB, but they are all gone too

Main page is updated. Bills poll will be up shortly

@BigdaddyinOrlando You have until 8:30p est boss

I plan to make that an option when the Bills hit the clock, because the poll takes more than 8 hours. That will give people plenty of time to make their poll selections, while I also garner trade interest. Then, once the poll is done, I can work through the trade offers

Not a bad idea. Depending on how we are progressing in the draft, we can maybe try that. Or, make the poll with one of the options be a trade back. If we don't a trade back, then we just select the player who got the most votes

I haven’t done that in the past because it’s too ambiguous. We talk about trading up for a certain player, but trading back would be for what exactly? I know the answer and why we would, but I don’t know how to apply that to a mock. Yes, we could agree to trade back, but to where. Do we make a poll for every offer. I feel it would slow things down too much and wouldn’t have a solid direction to it. Long story short, yes, I’ve considered it and thought it through 😋

@NeverOutNick on the clock until 3p est

As posted about, Verse was already selected. Also, when you make your pick, please make sure you post the next person up to draft

You're good to proceed. I just wanted to make sure everyone was on board and someone knew about it. Unfortunately, I've had issues in prior drafts where someone had two trades working at once, and both partners thought they were up to trade. That's where the trade approval process came into play The Eagles have pick #22, not #21. I fixed it for the main page. The values were correct. @Logic is on the clock

Who approved the trade? It looks fine to me, but @Logic did you sign off on this? As a reminder, all trades need to be approved first in a PM with myself, Alphadawg7, and both GM's involved in the trade

Main page is updated. Sorry for the delay, I just needed a moment away from a screen

@Big Blitzyou’re good to make your pick. I’ll update the main page in a bit

How would this differ from throwback uniform week when they wear the standing Buffalo helmet? I’ve never understood that part

Oh my lord, could it finally happen……?!

While there is debate over what future picks are worth, my math shows that, to get to 6, the Bills would have needed to trade: 2024 - Picks 1, 2, 4, and 4 2025 - Pick 1, 2, and 2 I just don't see that happening in any scenario and I haven't seen anyone in polls or messages that would have been okay with that. Now, at number 9, where the value is 300 less, maybe.....

If any of them fell to 10, the Bills would have been interested. Based on multiple thread and article reviews, the ammo to move up higher than 9 was too much for the Bills. The Bills did reach out about the 9 pick and were rejected. We def don't have the ammo to get up to 6

I've been waiting for someone to post this extension all day and mess with people in the title

Glad you mentioned this, and I forgot to say this earlier.... I would prefer to have picks only be traded once. If there's a special scenario where a second trade makes sense, I'll listen to it. But I don't want this to turn into a draft simulator where people just acquire a crazy amount of picks for the fun of it

I feel for you man. That's a tough spot to be in. I feel like the Chargers very much want to trade back and shore up their offensive line. But if no one calls, and there isn't an Oline of value there, then you do what you have to do. Maybe all of Harbaugh's "we are going to be a running team" is a smoke screen, but I doubt it. No one can argue that they don't need a receiver.

On one hand, that's a very NY move to get a superstar, and arguable the best player in the draft. On the other hand, that's a lot to move up just two spots where there will still be a premium player in the same position. The Giants have a lot of needs and I'm not sure giving up those picks for this situation is a smart move. But, can't say I hate it

The Arizona Cardinals traded #4, #138, #162 to the Giants for #6, #70, and #107 The Giants @BuffaloBillyG are on the clock until 3:10p est

The NFL tells them not to announce it anymore. It's been that way for years now. They will even make them use up half their clock on draft night. It's all part of the "suspense"