JDHillFan

Yes. It’s a giant world of media, social media, and differing views. You should avail yourself of some of it rather than making 5 minute judgements on people. Or basing anything on what you read here. Obviously. This does nothing to alter the political ideology of the faculties at the vast majority of institutions of higher learning. Nobody is debating that fact.

You’re desperate. There’s no “was” predominant. The word is IS. There’s no debate on the prevailing political position of university faculties. Good lord.

You are all over the place with who gets canceled and for what. In this guys case, why not let the voters make that decision? Edit - Forhan seems even-keeled and fun. In his twitter bio he uses the word “Nazi” and also alerts the world to his preferred pronouns. Vote for Elliot!

I have not accused anyone of “manipulating” young people. That’s a matter of your inability to read with discernment. I have stated that 18yo’s show up on campus not knowing how to cross the street safely and find themselves in an atmosphere OVERWHELMINGLY liberal in nature. That is not debatable. You want to imagine that has no bearing on the personal development of young people. Weird position to hold.

As seen by observances around the world, Kirk most certainly had an audience. I suspect most of his audience gave him more than 5 minutes to make a determination on his thoughts, unlike you. Nobody argues the fact that American universities are overwhelmingly liberal in their political leanings. Some apparently want to dispute that this means anything. Those people would be liberals. Laughable.

Can you share any posts agreeing with Bondi on this matter? You have stated “many here”. Should be easy.

To continue down the ridiculous path you are taking, how do we know the students aren’t listening to left-wing videos and podcasts? We don’t. It’s senseless speculation. You want to draw an equivalence between a one-time campus speaker and full-time faculty messaging over a course of years. Go for it. You got an “awesome” reaction from Redhawk. That should scare you. I notice you didn’t react to the latest venom from bullbuchanan. Your brand of straight-shooting sucks. It’s only straight when viewed through a political lens.

You attempted to draw an equivalence. A really dumb one. Not worth an answer.

It’s fine with me if you wish to compare the impact of someone speaking on campus perhaps once in a student’s lifetime to the daily influence of faculty. It’s obviously a very dumb thing to do but you are now off your soapbox and back into partisan mode. Have at it.

Good for you. Nobody can ever take that sort of fulfillment from you. I believe it was an abomination. One that dispersed when people got hungry. You are obsessed with something nobody bats an eye at anymore. See the results of the last election which you declared was lost by the thinnest of margins. One has to ignore the clean sweep of the swing states to believe that, but I’m sure it’s your version of straight-shooting. It’s why you immediately react to someone shooting into a crowd of Colorado Jews with “not as bad as Jan 6”. Looking forward to your reply to bullbuchanan. You can do it!

I agree with you regarding the “anti-American” part. It’s hyperbole in my estimation. Your belief that 18yo’s who don’t know sh*t about life show up on campus and are somehow immune to the messaging they get from faculty that is OVERWHELMINGLY liberal, is nonsense.

Those comments were very bad. In all your tsk-tsking , you let them slide right on by. There’s a reason for that. Here are my thoughts on J6 and people that believe it to be worse than 9/11. That might not apply to you, but it does to the goof that goes by the handle Joe Ferguson Forever. It wasn’t something Mr Straight Shooter saw fit to comment on.

It’s got nothing to do with being wrapped up in politics. You are pretending that 18yo’s with no meaningful life experience show up on campus already firm in their beliefs and cannot be swayed by the constant messaging of those in charge of the learning environment. That’s just strange.

I am not cheering on the thought police but if people are paying a price for sociopathic comments, that’s on them. It was a choice they made. Thank you for asking about who is cheering it here. See below. Not a single negative word or reaction to any of this from you, the no BS straight shooter in real life. By your own admission you are not social media involved. That’s good but it also makes you oblivious to the modern world and the level of venom out there regarding Kirk. Also by your own admission you didn’t know who he was but you spent 5 minutes looking into him and that was enough to issue your judgement. Good for you. Bottom line - you are an ultra-partisan and your admonitions for everyone to settle down aren’t worth sh*t if they aren’t compliant with your own actions and inactions.

See what I mean about your usual BS? If I may quote you directly: