Jump to content

daz28

Community Member
  • Posts

    5,331
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by daz28

  1. I was beginning to be a doubting thomas, but results don't lie. If you were spamming McClappy and McDummy, then why stop now. Maybe he's not the coach to win a SB, and I respect that opinion. If you were just a hater, then maybe do a little self-reflection.
  2. Happens a lot, but they don't always call it.
  3. Prob didn't even need it, but cheers anyways Freddie
  4. Absolutely, I was just pointing out he got a handful of nothing trying to press him.
  5. Benford trying to press him caused that TD
  6. It's effectively a no sweat bet
  7. Oh mama mia......
  8. Our safeties are cooked. Hope it's their last year
  9. It's really just a counter. The Thurman Thomas special.
  10. I said don't bother with the tangent, because it assumes I was ok with any pardons for anyone. Soooo, are you ok with BLM'ers OR the insurrectionists getting pardons?
  11. Ok, then reframe the question. Do you think democrats should pardon those involved in the BLM "riots"? It's a real simple question, that won't require you to go off on a tangent, which will certainly be your first inclination.
  12. Damn. I wanted in on that 1000:1; $1000 min bet. He goes to the klink, and our country is saved, I lose $1k. If I win, I get $1M to move somewhere that's not run by Christo-fascists. Win-Win scenario.
  13. I'm going with 6-3, but I think they punt the whole insurrection part, and make some ruling on a different issue, that overturns.
  14. Then maybe they just chose a bad name for it. Maybe they should have called it the more than civil disorder act? So now we ignore definitions AND the literal name of things. It's weird that no GQP calls it an insurrection, but they would have been 100% in support if Trump used the "Insurrection" Act. The mental gymnastics are absurd.
  15. Like everything, it's vague and poorly written. The basic gist is that it's there to help uphold/protect the Constitution. The power and discretion belongs completely to the president, but it's there to assist the authorities already in place. Supposedly, if the president goes rogue with it, then the courts can intervene(after the fact and ineffective like everything). General civil disorder would be the national guard, unless it's martial law, where the federal government takes over everything.
  16. You must have missed the news that Trump is claiming he was banned from Twitter so he couldn't invoke the Insurrection Act. If there was no insurrection, why would he have been trying to invoke the act???
  17. If that's Jalen Ramsay, it's an INT
  18. It will catch up with them.
  19. Well, it's a 6 point game, and no matter how bad Dallas looks/how good Miami looks, the refs can still win this one for us.
  20. If there's a silver lining here, it's that Cowboys fans, who 2 weeks ago had Dak pegged MVP and the team Super Bowl bound, exist. 🤣
  21. Your previous post: People like you all have “hive” mind…there is no desire for depth of understanding the different reasons for why people would vote for a particular candidate Next post: So I try to speak in the language that Leftists, on here, will understand… Change the word candidate to ideology, and I present a perfect case of hypocrisy.
  22. They should have went with full pressure. A sack was the only good outcome
  23. Hella catch by Raheem. 21 TD's that's crazy. That said, Go Cowboys, which hurts to say, too
  24. Everyone knows the rule is sketch, but that's how the cookie crumbles. There's absolutely no question his weight landed fully on the QB. It's one of those instances, where it's up to the defensive player to figure out how to not break the rule.
×
×
  • Create New...