VABills

How many times did JP get sacked? Brady? Don't give me that crap that he gets hit everytime within 4 seconds, it's BS.

But by your rationalization NE should have lost since their OL didn't protect Brady. You now are saying a Qb can win games? Which is it?

??? Actually no, we got a lot more pressure on Brady then NE got on JP. Did you watch the game?

No, but neither did Bradys. How many turnovers did he have? I believe Brady got hit a lot more than JP.

Hey Joe, where did you get that Sabres avatar? I think it's crooked.

You don't expect a QB to help a team win?

Sorry take Crow off that list. He should be our LB in nickle/dimes, but he's terrible filling gaps, and shedding blocks. Also, Reed deserves to be on that list. He has done everything asked of him to be the starter at the #2 / slot WR. Also, Royals is pretty good, again he has done mostly everything asked.

What was his record?

Josh Reed. Anyone who can get in Harrisons face, and keep doing it, is MVP.

They just started reporting it 2 weeks ago, but it seems he's had it longer. http://www.canada.com/topics/sports/story....34fccd6&k=94705

He is. He has played most of the season with a torn quad.

I disagree that it was peerless. The entire oline never set after the snap. The whole bunch was moving and talking when the ball was snapped.

Well Reed seems to be playing well. Getting open, blocking well, fighting for the extra yard and getting Harrisons face. Not much else you can ask. Oh and please don't ever run that A formation snap to him again.

I'm gonna buy one for all my liberal friends.

For someone else maybe. I think Larry's got a better reputation then that.

Larry's been writing a long time, and was responsible for writing and endorsing Shaw and Kelly for the HOF. I honestly don't read him every week, but I am not sure when I have, that I have ever seen him burn a player like this. I'm guessing that with Felser some of this sentiment comes from within OBD and has a ring of truth to it. http://www.buffalonews.com/editorial/20061...?tbd1058394.asp

One more for good luck. http://www.military.com/NewsContent/0,1331...=topstories.RSS

http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/IraqCoverage/sto...TC-RSSFeeds0312 http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=100...=top_world_news Yeah, the problem is you and your ilk, keep putting the Sheehans, the Keven Tillman up as people who lost people in Iraq and don't support Bush. Yet to be fair you don't show the Griffens, or Meyers, or most of the other parents and brothers and sisters, who have lost but still support the mission. Since it doesn't support your or the liberal media's agenda, they get very cursory time to show their side. They just keep showing the lunatic fringe and not the 99% who are pro Bush and still support the cause.

Maybe the whole team goes to LA.

why don't you two get a room? 811954[/snapback] Sorry I've got hair on my balls and therefore not his type. Thank the Lord.

At times. But I like it that way. Right now I am exhausted and therefore felt like basically being an ass. Of course I am good at it anyways, but you make it so easy.

Yes.

What do you expect when the guys are dating 14 year olds. Not done with school yet. BTW, literal translation is "I see you" as spelled. Although it is proper French it is very poor and informal. The polite way is J'ai vu vous. Which is the really the polite way of saying I see or I saw you. The way it is spelled is considered very rude and likely she is agreee at you because she saw you somewhere where she didn't expect you. And yes I am not kidding. That truly is the difference. BTW, the other thing on the translation is if you mispelled the first part. If it's "J'aime tu vu". I roughly translates to "I may like you". Again not ompletely proper, but may also be what she is thinking.

Grand National.

No he's a pimp for 14 year olds to Canadians