Jump to content

cle23

Community Member
  • Posts

    1,308
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by cle23

  1. 19 minutes ago, BuffaloHokie13 said:

    I think I'm in the opposite boat. Take Williams or McGlinchey at 12 and the best remaining CB (or potentially another EDGE if they slide, like Davenport or Landry) at 22

    None of the OT are good enough for that high. Take Ward or Fitz and honestly I'd maybe take OT at 22, but I may wait for 33 or 35 as well. Or take Ward/Fitz at 12, Hughes/Alexander at 22, RB at 33, and OT at 35. Brown has great tape and horrible combine. Could be a steal.

  2. 4 hours ago, NastyNateSoldiers said:

    I'm not a big fan of Miller would rather have Vander Esch at 22 or trade bk with Cleveland for #33 & #35 . Take Connor Williams and Sony Michel with those pks. Cleveland would make a deal at this pt if Mike Hughes, Jaire Alexander or McGlitchey is still available 

    33 or 35 and 64 maybe, not 33 and 35.

  3. 20 hours ago, Dadonkadonk said:

    I think the Browns will draft Chubb or the OG from ND at 4 even if Barkely is still there.  They can get an elite defender or OL and get a running back later.  

    This scenario then allows Denver to take Barkely and would still leave one of the top 4 quarterbacks on the board at 6.

    Cleveland's last need is a guard. They have 2 very good, highly paid guards.  It's Chubb, Barkley,  or trade down at 4.

  4. 53 minutes ago, SinceThe70s said:

     

    Full disclosure. I had to let google refresh my memory on the details after your post. Ditka traded his draft for the 5th pick and the 4th pick was Edgerrin James. WTF? Memory fades and I just had it in my mind that they traded their entire  draft for #1.

     

    And then after passing on all the picks, the Browns took Couch over Donovan McNabb. Let's hope the Browns do Brownian things again this year and it benefits the Bills...however it all goes down!

     

     

    Couch could have been a good QB, he just got no help and a line that couldn't protect him at all. Manning probably would have sucked on that team.

  5. 19 minutes ago, BarleyNY said:

    Hearing Darnold is the Browns preference at 1 (not a stretch) and Chubb at 4 if he makes it there (ditto).  The 3 way trade is actually a possibility and would result in the Browns taking Mayfield at 2 (after Darnold going 1).  Darnold is also the only QB the NYG would take at 2.  Otherwise it’s Chubb or Barkley.

    If Darnold is #1, just take him.

  6. 16 minutes ago, Shaw66 said:

    Another fine example.   

     

    To be honest, I know very little about the QBs and NOTHING about anyone else.   Don't know who Chubb is, where's he's from or what position he plays.   I at least can answer those questions about Barkely, but nothing beyond that.    I just can't get interested.   It's enough to know there are possibly four and maybe more good QBs in this draft, along with the usual two or three super-studs at other positions, guys who would be going 1-2-3 if EJ Manuel were the best QB in the draft.   

     

    In that kind of a draft, you're going to see exactly what we've seen and will continue to see.   Moves to get into position, and speculation about a lot of other moves.   The Bills, beginning with the Chiefs deal last season, have put themselves in the mix.   The Jets made a great move to 3.  The Browns, of course, set themselves up beautifully.   The Giants have a tough decision to make.   Broncos seem to me to be a big wildcard.   

     

    For fans whose teams are in the mix, is interesting, crazy, fascinating and fun.  

    Now that's a really interesting point.    If the Browns win big with their two first-round picks, their cap situation in four years gets very complicated.   They'll have a $30 million QB and a $20 million running back to deal with.   

    That's not how it works though. The 4th year option is based on the 10 highest salaries at your position,  not by draft slot.  The QB would garner a ton of money but I doubt Barkley would be $20 million. Either way, that 4 years of great play to figure it out.

  7. 3 hours ago, FeelingOnYouboty said:

    Bills trade #12 and #22 to Colts for #6

     

    Bills trade #6 and #65th to Browns for #4

     

    Browns-Darnold

    Giants-Barkley

    Jets-Mayfield

    Bills-Rosen

     

    We would still have picks 53, 56, 96 and we keep all our picks next year. This also ensures we jump over Broncos, cut out the Cardinals, Dolphins, Patriots and whoever else wants to trade up because the Giants are not trading out of #2.

    It took 3 2nds for the Jets to go from 6 to 3 but it only costs a 3rd to go from 6 to 4? 

  8. 4 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

     

    So for this to work, it's going like this:

    -Bills trade 12th pick, 2nd and 4th round pick to Colts in exchange for 6th pick

    -Bills trade 6th pick and 22nd pick to Giants in exchange for 2nd pick

    -Someone gives Bills a 5th round pick back as change

     

    I'd be surprised that 12th overall, 2nd and 4th round was enough to move up to 6th. 

     

    What did the Jets give to move from 6th to 3rd overall?

    -

    2 2nds this year and a 2nd next year. 

  9. 21 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

    It’s a guide too. People get caught up in the numbers. Look at what the Dolphins traded for Dion Jordan vs. what the Redskins traded for RG3. Both teams traded to 2 but at a totally different price.

    Right, one was for a quarterback and one wasn't. There are premiums paid when trading up for a QB.

×
×
  • Create New...