ngbills

And maybe, just maybe, you add better WR's not only is the run even more successful but also have a dominant passing attack when needed. Maybe that makes the team a Super Bowl team, not just a playoff team. Or should they not want better WR's because then playoffs are good enough? So tired of the we dont need WR's talk. Its ok to admit we do and just say will there have not been a lot options, but we are trying.

Schefter is a genius. Reporting that the Bills are making calls for a WR at the deadline. Now I know why he gets paid the big bucks.

I dont know about that. The Bills were 10-6 in year 2 and 13-3 in year 3. The difference is more about Vrabel and the coaching staff plus the Pats dont have a ton of awful contracts. Many of us want to forget the Bills were handing out ~$10M/yr contracts to guys like Star, Mario Addison, Trent Murphy, Quinton Jefferson, Vernon Butler, AJ Klein, Josh Norman...wait this sounds kind of familiar

A bit of both - Sporting news and ESPN https://sports.yahoo.com/article/bills-predicted-swing-fences-trade-144547634.html

Bills looking at Budda Baker? Would be a huge upgrade. But I still want a WR.

Crosby to Pats seems to have a lot of buzz.

Pickens would be nice. That didnt happen.. then I would not be trading up in the 2nd for Sanders and just staying put. We could have grabbed Mike Green and Andrew Mukaba. Both would be helping a lot more than Sanders and Jackson.

Bills had picks 56 and 62. They could have used #62 rather than a third and received back a later or future pick. HOU was a team on the rise in the AFC and the Bills traded with them. I see that being no different that PIT and BUF. I just think it is more likely the Bills chose not to trade for Pickens. Not that PIT would not trade with BUF or we did not have the pieces to make a trade.

Well they actually traded him to HOU - a team that they have played multiple times in the playoffs. How is that different than PIT trading with BUF? Its the exact same thing.

Exactly. That is like the Bills trading with KC, we all know teams don't do stupid things like this.

JAX has Raiders SD has TEN Loser of Bills/KC will most likely drop to 8th

Can only hope for some bad losses. BUF, TB and possibly BAL are games on paper they many not be favored. The others are Jets twice, MIA, ATL, CIN, NYG...

Disagree. The AFC is much tougher this year in terms of wild card. There very likely will be a 10-11 win team left out of the playoffs. There are so many bottom dwellers that the wild card is going to be a battle. IND has the south locked. PIT may have a battle with BAL with Jackson coming back for the north. The east is all NE and BUF but NE is winning at least 11 games with that schedule. The west you likely have 3 teams winning 10-11 with KC, DEN, SD. So its gonna come down to 3 spots for these 4-5 teams: NE/BUF division loser, KC/SD/DEN division losers, PIT/BAL division loser and then throw in a JAX.

When he has been active - Bills are 0-2. When he has been inactive 5-0.

Bills adding Brian Thomas Jr and Logan Wilson. I dreamt it so must be happening. Super Bowl odds went from +750 to +500.