Rock-A-Bye Beasley

Injuries were baked into your argument. Offense is much worse also. Traded our #1WR for a guy who is 19 right now 27 points because we were eating clock all game. They scored on every possession until late. Every single one

Kinda wish our season and McDermott’s tenure ended on a loss to Easton stick and some interim HC. Then we’d still have Diggs and all this roster turnover which is happening anyway would be worth it. We could have already tried out a couple HCs since 13 seconds. Never forget So we are the same?! Coupdnt stop the chiefs last year either.the goal is to get bette r

yay! Our WR1 is 34th best. Do you hear what you’re stretching to say? the truth is we needed to add to last years group. There was talk of adding a true #2 or 1B to compliment Diggs and push Davis to #3 instead both are gone and we have a second round rookie and some bottom of the roster players for depth.

Might be the fact that there are 2 1st rd picks, a 2nd rd pick on a 2nd contract, 2 FA signings and a rookie at DE and a thread about needing another one on this board.

you should be able to undo a trade down, because that's some lame ass *****, especially letting KC go ahead. Might as well hold the door for them and bow pathetic, he went to business school have some confidence

McDermott did nine eleven, i mean thirteen seconds

McDermott took over the defense for 13 seconds

Fair, and I was exaggerating about the first but it does seem we re always taking less in these trade downs and paying more in the trade ups. I think there was a report on that just before the draft.

Dude what aren't you understanding, they don't know who KC wants but they want someone. Unless they're offering a 1st or maybe 2nd I wouldn't have done it. Especially to just take a backup DT in the 3rd As a side effect it exposes you didn't want who you nd up picking later that bad

No, you put a lot of words in my mouth there. First of all, whenever Beane trades up he says "he was the last 1st round grade left on our board" but now KC couldn't be i the same position? second, never said SF abslutely would have taken him, but we had the earlier pick so we get our choice and hopefully by the time it ets to KC their player will be gone. Why guarantee they get him? The 4th round trade up wasn't worth that alone to me. third, and this is a new point, trading from 32 to 33 was annoying as hell amking all the fans wait and also cost the 5th year option. was it really that much gained?

Agreed it was too early

Ok, but one more point. KC's guy could've been picked by SF. We guaranteed they got the guy they want. You can say we can't worry about other teams but we absolutely can.

My point is the Bills may have had a group of 6 players all rated exactly the same (they'd have to for a trade down to 33 to be worth it, especially for such little compensation) So they let KC choose their guy, then Carolina as well. So they didn't mind losing out on Worthy or Legette, but they also didn't care about Coleman becasue he could've been picked as well. It's weird I have to say that , but I'm seeing a lot of fans saying "Coleman was their guy" but Beane's actions dont match that narrative.

Why can't he be one of those in the group rated the same?

Oh thought you were talking about Coleman specifically. They were ok with losing out on Coleman clearly. They traded down for him like EJ Manuel, another FSU guy

No, you're completely ignoring the fact that the Bills punted the choice. They didn't know who KC would take (but had to know it would probably be a WR)

What do you mean by combusted? Would he have sat out? Would they have a better chance to win the Superbowl?

Well I don't know all the details but I suspect our head coach is a major player either directly by being the main reason they haven't won or indirectly by not being able to smooth it over.

Yeah, sorry, I meant anyone who subscribes to the collective idea that any player who is unhappy because they're not winning is a "cancer". Not saying you said that but I've heard it a lot from Bills and Sabres fans over the years.

Why does it have to be a 4th round rookie? They let KC and a few other SB competitor teams have a choice first only to move up to the 3rd. Then decided to stay put and get a backup DT

Like all the other players who left buffalo to win. They're winners. You're a loser

What holes? backup DT, C, Safety, nothing you need to spend premium assets on

Exactly, if you can't smooth things over with Diggs that's on you. Ignore him and benefit from his on field play and try to win a superbowl again. The reason Cincinatti gave for not trading Higgins was "We're trying to win a superbowl"

Moss wasn't successful there? What a joke. Be real man

F if I'm being honest. If you gave me a list of potential draft hauls before the draft I would have graded this an F. I like Van Pran, but if you told me the Bills let the Chiefs go before them so they could move up into the 3rd to draft a DT... Even the RB, which I think drafting one at all is foolish, was taken right before the guy I wanted.