buffblue
-
Posts
1,805 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by buffblue
-
-
6 minutes ago, Motorin' said:
Oh absolutely. The past is always predicative of the future...
The funny thing is, I had remembered Scott Chandler's fumble in OT happening "with the playoffs on the line." When I looked it up, a win would have made us 5-7 at that point.
My oh my have things changed.
Stevie Johnson also had a critical drop in that Toronto game if I'm not mistaken.
Still remember hoping against hope as we mounted a comeback that Manuel could be the answer lol
-
3
-
-
Just now, Limeaid said:
Almost no QB can. Lemur may be able to run better, Br*dy might be able to fake better, but no QB has his complete package including willing to learn.
Truth, and can you believe this guy plays for Buffalo?
The Bills WILL win a championship with Josh Allen. He played like a savant today
-
1 minute ago, PatsFanNH said:
I don’t know I think if the D actually stops the Bills on that last drive, or Jackson actually holds onto the ball he leads them for the go ahead TD.. that doesn’t mean they win but I think he would have.. but then again the D sucked for the Pats.. (and probably because Allen made them look that way)
Classy. I loved Bill's acknowledgment of Allen's performance at the end.
Mac had a rough day, but these 2 organizations are now actual foes. We will enjoy many more riveting games like this until Belichick hangs it up
-
2
-
-
3 hours ago, RaoulDuke79 said:
This is correct. At least for the past 20 years or so. Hopefully times are a changing.
The funny part is Pats "fans" are such pathetic frontrunner bandwagon types.
I can almost guarantee the average Bills fan knows more about the Pats history than their own supporters. Steve Grogan, Andre Tippett, Garin Veris, Fred Marion, et al are probably complete unknowns to the average chowderhead.
-
14 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:
The Pats are likely to be in better shape than the narrative suggested at the beginning of this week.
Bourne is vaxxed and was showing no symptoms, and Stevenson finished the Colts game. They'll be close to full strength. We need Dawkins and Sanders back, and (crosses fingers) no more positive tests.
-
2 hours ago, Success said:
Bourne for Beasley is pretty even.
Nothing yet to indicate it will tip any scales one way or the other.
I want to say that I saw Bourne was vaxxed though, so he may be good by Sunday while Beasley is clearly out
-
32 minutes ago, Logic said:
I'll say it again, because many probably skimmed past it:
I read -- ( https://apnews.com/article/kathy-hochul-sports-nfl-business-buffalo-bills-77b347e94170316c76a9c9bd380b80ae ) -- that the plan for the new stadium in Orchard Park is to be built in such a way as to protect the field and the fans from the winds and the elements, similar to Seattle's stadium. I've attended a game there late in the year, and despite it being a cold and windy day, you couldn't really tell from the stands.
This type of construction doesn't COMPLETELY mitigate the cold, but it makes it VASTLY more tolerable than it is at Highmark Stadium.
Here's the pertinent quote from the Wawrow article above: "The new venue would not include a roof, but it would be designed so that a majority of the seats would be protected from the elements, the person said."
Works for me
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, Casey D said:
Because if the Bills end up at 10-7, assuming a loss to NE (which if we win none of this matters much), you want as many teams as possible to get to under 10 wins. The chances of a 7-7 team, or a 7-6-1 team in the case of Pitt-- winning out are small, particularly how many teams at 8-6/7-7 play each other, are very small. Stated differently, this outcome increases the chances that 10-7 gets in irrespective of tiebreakers.
Or to take it a step further, it increases the likelihood that team(s) that could potentially beat us in a tiebreaker scenario have more overall losses than us
-
1
-
1
-
-
Just now, Brianmoorman4jesus said:
Man that was beautiful.
Big time help there. Let Cincy win the AFC North given their superior AFC record compared to the Browns and Ravens.
We are all Bengals fans against Baltimore next week
-
1
-
-
Just now, Bruffalo said:
The Bills can always just win the east. Easy peasey.
Of course but we could play a strong game and still lose against Belichick. It's football.
Would sure be nice to have a backup route to the postseason where anything can happen.
-
1
-
-
Just now, RichRiderBills said:
The Browns winning does not drastically hurt Bills playoff chances. It bumps us this week , but winning our last two games gets us in most scenarios.
We need two of the three AFC north teams to finish with 8 losses (sans Pittsburgh, who is toast).
This definitely makes that harder to happen
-
-
I can't believe the Raiders are this pathetic. This is unfortunately the downside to the Colts Pats result.
I feel good about the rematch, but we better win on Sunday. Might be curtains otherwise
-
5 minutes ago, Brianmoorman4jesus said:
Is that the 3rd time he’s fumbled? What is he doing back there
The Raiders are such losers. Absolutely no way they should be in this position, but...
-
2
-
-
Not a chance on this one. While he is dangerous, which team will he hurt?
He has a repeated history of poor ball security. I like Isaiah and wish we used him more on offense but keep him away from returns, especially punts
-
I believe someone mentioned this earlier, but now that the Bengals won today we should root for them against Baltimore next week.
With a victory, Cincy would be 4-1 in the division and 7-3 in the AFC which would put them in a strong position to win the division (and completes a season sweep of the Ravens). They are the last team of the 3 AFC North foes we want to be competing against for the WC.
-
20 minutes ago, ColoradoBills said:
I will let you lament with your vision of the playoff picture.
I would however recommend that you read the tie-breaker rules for multiple teams tied for a wildcard spot.
I know the rules for the tiebreaker buddy. Care for me to explain them to you?
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, Beast said:
The Ravens have a meat grinder for a schedule. I believe they finish at 9-8.
The Browns have the Raiders.....then at Green. ay, Pittsburgh and at Cincy. I definitely see two losses there.
I agree but unfortunately they might be the least of our concerns and we would still need more help in a 10-7 scenario.
What would really be great is if a team like the Chargers would slip up and lose an unthinkable Jags like game, such as at the Texans next week
-
1 minute ago, ColoradoBills said:
Well for all you % making the playoffs fans IF the Ravens lose to the Bengals next week their number is 27%.
They also have to play the Rams and Steelers.
I hope this doesn't come into play, but if we lose to the Pats it's not enough to say, "Well, the Ravens are on the ropes".
The Chiefs, Pats, Colts, Chargers and Titans are virtual locks to get into the postseason. One of the Ravens, Browns, or Bengals will win the AFC North. Of the remaining two, the Bills will most likely need both to get to 8 losses if we finish 10-7 and want to get in as a WC.
Our odds are basically a flip of a coin if we don't win out
-
1 minute ago, ColoradoBills said:
Um the Bills won today.
Cmon man obviously I meant in terms of other games around the AFC
-
If the Ravens score here, will Harbaugh go for 2 again to win?
Wtf are the Pack doing to close this thing out
-
GB blowing this game would seal the worst case scenario this weekend
-
Drew Lock is just an ass qb...
-
And the Broncos are done...
1/2/22 Falcons at Bills
in The Stadium Wall
Posted
We don't have much history against the Falcons, but since I'm feeling nostalgic I thought I'd remind everyone of the 2009 matchup, also known as "The Brian Brohm Game".
Such an illustrious career he had. We lost 31-3. Good times!