buffblue
-
Posts
1,790 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by buffblue
-
-
3 hours ago, davefan66 said:
Morse is a bigger than loss people think. Great repport with Josh and smart guy to call the line.
As said above, are we treading water or making a step forward?
I don’t see us as better with the moves so far as much as stayed the same.As the old saying goes, if you're not getting better you're getting worse. Still plenty of offseason remaining however
-
1
-
-
3 minutes ago, Your Brown Eye said:
#Flutiewouldvewonthegame
Not a chance as he flat out stunk all year. Hell even in the 1998 WC game against Miami (the year he was halfway decent) Flutie puked all over himself with 3 terrible turnovers
-
1
-
3
-
1
-
-
52 minutes ago, HappyDays said:
He was the starting center for the Chargers when we played them last year. I remember thinking how lucky we were to play against their 3rd center in our matchup, and then our interior DL did basically nothing. So maybe our coaches were impressed and figured he was worth a shot as a camp body if nothing else.
Yep. I was certain our DL would eat against a decimated line and Easton Stick. No one did anything until the Oliver sack to end the game
-
1
-
-
35 minutes ago, Beast said:
I don’t know, call me an idiot but I’ll take McDermott’s evaluation of those positions and give it a little more credibility than yours.And to think, the off-season has a long ways to go and we also have a thing called the draft ahead of us.
I'd be lying if I said I felt great about the safety position at this juncture, but McD has earned the benefit of the doubt when it comes to coaching up a secondary. It's also why I don't agree with some prognosticators saying we need to draft a corner just because of cutting Tre. We still have some solid pieces in place to field a good pass defense.
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Ed_Formerly_of_Roch said:
It may come down to who is the better holder.
I hope not. It would be ridiculous if they keep Haack purely for Bass because he stinks as a punter compared to Martin. Bass o matic just needs to get it together.
-
1
-
4
-
-
What a terrible deal to give to such an undeserving player. Cleveland is a joke. I would be breaking stuff if the Bills gave out this contract
-
1 hour ago, boco357 said:
Chris Kelsay 2.0
I'm sure he will bring his lunch pail and hard hat
-
1 hour ago, NewEra said:
Jamal Adams is bottom of the barrel, not top of the market. And he’d be an awful choice for us playing next to Rapp
He was never good. One of the most overrated players in recent memory
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, SoonerBillsFan said:
Where did I say not to bring Johnson back? Please show me, you can't. What I said was move him to Safety that allows us to move to a 4-3 and put our best people on the field.
Christ this board sometimes.
Moving Johnson to safety makes about as much sense as hiring Matt Patricia as your offensive coordinator. Seriously? He's an all pro slot corner lol
-
Blackmon is the ideal type of player to sign in free agency. Should be mid range cost but he is still young and ascending. This would be an excellent move if it came to fruition.
-
3
-
2
-
-
1 minute ago, KDIGGZ said:
The one that they just signed to be the starting QB and sadly will likely get beat out by Fields. If I was Russ I'd be pissed.
Well, he is getting paid 38 million to not be a part of his former team so he should keep the violin stashed
-
2
-
-
2 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:
It’s all just flailing.
i think Wilson will surprise. If he doesn’t, bringing in Fields to resurrect the moribund QB position in Pittsburgh is as bad a decision as it was in Chicago
After seeing Wilson the last few years, why is acquiring him potentially a sage move but trading pennies for Fields a joke? This isn't the Russell Wilson of 2011-2020 for Seattle. Make it make sense
-
1 minute ago, FireChans said:
They won’t pick it up.
Maybe not but it's not like it's some prohibitive figure that is going to doom them for multiple years.
So long as Mike Tomlin is coach, the Steelers will be just good enough to lack the ammo to get a top qb. What are they going to do next year after they finish 9-8 and Wilson sucks balls again?
-
Just now, FireChans said:
It’s quite expensive for a bad QB who can’t pass.
Well, when you're the Steelers and a) are not in a position to land one of the top prospects in the draft and b) your previous QB had no upside with 13 tds in 25 games, it doesn't sound so bad to me
-
1 minute ago, papazoid said:
Fields 5th yr option is $25.664 million
That is dirt cheap in today's QB landscape
-
1 minute ago, Bferra13 said:
Pittsburgh gets to foot the contract now. Bears saw the market dried up and just wanted out. He's pretty terrible.
He's without question better than anyone on their roster last year, as well as the vet minimum worthy Wilson. Pittsburgh can more than afford to pick up his option. What I don't get is the reporting I now see that he is not in a QB competition. If that's the case, why make the deal at all?
-
5 minutes ago, Special K said:
FA QB market dried up quickly, but a 2025 6th?? Would’ve been better off keeping him, and waiting to see if a team’s QB gets hurt in Training Camp
Agreed, but as much as I hated the Russel Wilson move this is a great deal for Pittsburgh. Hopefully Fields doesn't put it together and add to the AFC qb gauntlet
-
3
-
1
-
1
-
-
16 minutes ago, Ethan in Cleveland said:
Agree. He is awful. Move makes total sense from Steelers perspective
True but I'm not a fan of the Russell Wilson bridge idea. Regardless, Pickett having 13(!) career TD's in 25 games is laughably bad so Russ can't be any worse
-
-
This is just an awful post
-
1
-
4
-
3
-
2
-
-
Well rats
-
Don't quite understand the hate for Neal. It's obviously not a huge loss that we can't overcome, but he was a good role player for the Bills for 6 years 🤷
-
2
-
-
1 minute ago, Doc Brown said:
Kind of screwed Mixon over there waiting until now to release him. How's $1.2m sound Mixon?
He's been such an outstanding citizen too. My heart breaks for Joe
-
2
-
1
-
3
-
-
I'm happy about this move, pending money of course. Needs to become more consistent but the ability is there. Draft and develop
-
1
-
PSL Pricing/Seat Selection Discussion
in The Stadium Wall
Posted
They were discussing the PSL issue on WGR this morning and (for what it's worth) said that the absolute highest price (club or otherwise) for the Vikings was 9k. That was back in 2018 with a building that is probably going to be considered far superior to our new digs.
I know building costs are insane now but that was a mere 6 years ago when the Vikings palace checked in at 1.1 billion. Still a bit shocking that ANY seats could be in the 20-50k range for a stadium in Buffalo that is not exactly going to be the Taj Mahal.