Buffalo03
-
Posts
4,832 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Buffalo03
-
-
If you're gonna use PEDs, you should at least some semblance of being good. Using PEDs to still suck is next level stupid
-
1
-
2
-
-
On 2/12/2024 at 11:26 PM, Thrivefourfive said:
In whatever place these freakozoid athletes get to mentally, Allen has no choice but to get there with them. Jordan has it, Tiger has it, Nicklaus had it, Brady and Montana had it. I’m sure Lou Gehrig, Joe DiMaggio had it. Recently, all three Tennis greats have it.
It’s all upstairs. There are ways we can tell that a great one has the instinct for winning championships. It’s how they talk, what they say, what they believe is happening, and how they lead the situation to reach the top — total belief in yourself to be the reason your team wins championships.
Athletes are insanely confident individuals. Even proven competent pros think they’re the very best at what they do, when they’re clearly not, usually because of physical limitations.
Allen has the physical talent to be in the historical sports best-of-the-best group, so he’ll have to find that mental place that gets him there. His, focus, concentration, and determination needs improvement.
These posts get dumber and dumber by the day. Congratulations, you are the winner today. What's the headline gonna be for the next dumb poster tomorrow? "Allen is a poodle, Mahomes is a Rottweiler. Allen needs to be a Rottweiler". I can't wait to read it
-
1
-
-
7 minutes ago, Gregg said:
What they wore against the Bills when Rodgers got hurt is what they are going back to. Their fans loved those uniforms.
Yeah, those were the ones I was referring to. The Boomer Esiason jerseys
-
2
-
-
Go back to their 80s and early to mid 90s jerseys with the Jet as the T over the word Jets
-
1
-
-
23 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said:
Are you completely missing the entire point of this on purpose?
I'm not missing the point. I know the point you are trying to make. What I am telling you is, no matter what you show me, we are not winning a championship
-
Lo
25 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said:This guy was speaking the truth as well.
Lol. They also had 2 championships with Elway. Big difference. If they didn't win with Manning. It wouldn't have been a big deal
-
Replace the guy that can't get past the divisional round with the guy that is 0-2 in the Super Bowl. Seems legit
-
I would draft 2 WRs and say "f*ck the salary cap" and bring in Danielle Hunter or Brian Burns who will both be free agents. I'm tired of not having that elite pass rusher. Danielle Hunter just had a 16 sack season at 29. We can get 3 good years out of him
-
3 hours ago, Royale with Cheese said:
Is this one of those oxymoron types of things?
No. Just truth
-
9 hours ago, Royale with Cheese said:
"That's just the way it is"
- Cubs fans 1908-2016
That's the truth. Only there will never be an ending year for the Bills
-
If he was Beane he would get blasted for Mecole Hardman and Skyy Moore in the 2nd, a 1st on Clyde Edwards-Helaire and trading for Kadarius Toney. But it's Brett Veach so he has to be praised
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, LABILLBACKER said:
They don't have to destroy us. All they have to do is win. This isn't about some ridiculous point differential award. If, if, if....some fans live in the world of IF.
But what you're saying is we make one more play than they do in a game and we are the better team but because we didn't, we're not. There's more to it than that
-
3 minutes ago, 90sBills said:
0-3 against KC when it mattered says Bills are not better regardless of how your heart wants it to be.It's not my heart lol. 2 or 3 plays being different is what makes us better than the Chiefs apparently but because we didn't get those 2 or 3 plays, it means they are clearly better. That's literally the mindset of people here
-
1 minute ago, Bleeding Bills Blue said:
Clearly we are fairly evenly matched with KC, the games literally all come down to the wire. Doesn't mean how we match up with SF, or a healthy burrow-led cincy squad, or whomever. Football is matchups, its game calling, its the players making a play at a given moment, etc. I don't fear KC, and I think we will knock them off in the next year or two, but it doesn't matter if you can't win the ones after that.
If you wanna tell me the Bengals are better than us, I will listen to that. That is a team that has physically manhandled us WAY more than the Chiefs have. They destroyed us in the playoffs and then the game against them this year wasn't much better. We are literally a couple flipped plays of being better than the Chiefs. We are miles behind the Bengals in my opinion
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, Billsatlastin2018 said:
Both these are examples of HCing incompetence! The inability to impart what to do and absolutely what NOT to do in given, critical, end of game, situations!As in…
Is Andy Reid clearly better than McDermott? Yes absolutely. Are the Chiefs as a team clearly better than the Bills? A difference of 2 or 3 plays in 2 playoff games and we are the better team. If it's as simple as "they won, they're better". Than if 13 second doesn't happen, they're still better? If we somehow got a defensive stop if Shakir catches that TD, then we're better? Like I have said, the 49ers are better than both the Packers and Lions but should have lost both games. If the Lions or Packers win either game, it doesn't make them the better team.
-
2 minutes ago, hjnick said:
Even if we get that TD, Mahomes has 1:30 to go down the field and score a TD to win the game.
You REALLY think our D was gonna stop Mahomes that game? Why? We didnt' stop them all night...
What IFs are a great game to play.
OK. for the record. I said myself that even if Allen hit that pass, we probably still don't win that game because we didn't stop them defensively all game. Those were my own words. I'm not naive enough to think we would have stopped them. My point I've been trying to make is IF IIIIIIIIIIIFFFFFF we hit that pass and got the luckiest break in the world on defense after that to win that game, we are all of a sudden better because we beat them, right? But because we didn't, that's everyone's reason to say they're better?
-
3 minutes ago, cgg716 said:
Frankly? No. The gap between teams isn't that big. Love is an emerging star. Inexperience and coaching were factors that day. Just like yesterday. And in the AFCCG and the Bills game
But the 49ers beat them. The 49ers should have lost to both the Packers and Lions. They didn't play well but the 49ers are better than both teams. My point is, if the 49ers had lost one of those games, it just means those teams were better on that day, not that they were the better team in general
-
3 minutes ago, LABILLBACKER said:
I wish people would realize this undisputed fact. The regular season is not as important to the Chiefs. They win enough to get in the playoffs then "flip the switch" like the Lakers used to do. The Bills are just the opposite. The regular season is their plateau. Once the playoffs and bright lights go on, they play tight just like their coach. Notice how KC's defense and most of their team are always healthy in January. This is not a coincidence.
They aren't destroying us. If McDermott doesn't have one of the biggest head coaching blunders in team history in 13 seconds....guess what? People would say we were the better team. If Allen hits Shalir in the end zone and we stop the Chiefs on their next drive....guess what? We're better than the Chiefs. Or would they still have been better if they lost both times?
-
1
-
-
3 minutes ago, hjnick said:
IMO, to think that Buffalo is better than the superbowl champions, who has won, what, 3? Superbowl championships in the last 5 years... is a little foolhardy.
We have the tools in alot of spots, but KC just uses them better WHEN IT MATTERS!
If Allen hits Shakir and we win we're better? But because he didn't, we aren't? Do I have this right?
-
Just now, hjnick said:
Packers biggest problem was playoff inexperience...
GB is a team to be reckoned with in the future... ugh.
They damn near beat the 49ers as the youngest team in the playoffs and damn well should have beaten them. And if they did, it doesn't make them the better team. The 49ers are better than them right now but nearly got beat by them in the playoffs. That's my point.
-
8 minutes ago, cgg716 said:
Regrettably that's exactly what it means. It's just not in the way everyone thinks. The players are much closer to equal, but being a team that continues to shoot itself in the foot is a reflection on coaching. And the Chiefs don't just have better coaching than the Bills, they have the NFLs best coaching, while the bills have bottom tier coaching
Do you think the 49ers are a much better team than the Packers?
-
9 minutes ago, prissythecat said:
There are 0 people outside of a few on this board who would argue that the Bills are better than the Chiefs. The objective record for the Chiefs speaks for itself. 4 Superbowl appearances and 3 Super Bowl wins in the last 5 seasons. The objective record of the Bills in last 5 seasons? 1 appearance in the AFC championship game and 4 early round exits in the playoffs.
How much better are the 49ers than the Packers? Where would you rank the Packers?
-
5 minutes ago, mannc said:
Good grief…we got every single possible break this year against the Chiefs and lost at home. We recovered three of our own fumbles, got the Hardman fumble through the EZ and got most every call by the officials…and still lost. Give it a rest.
Yes. But that doesn't mean you don't have the better team. It's about playing the best in the 3 hours of a playoff game of which we lost by 3 freaking points. We should have won both the 13 second game and this last playoff game. Everyone here is just seeing "loss to the Chiefs in the playoffs" and thinking they are the better team. If the Chiefs blew us out, I would agree with you all completely. A 3 point loss that could have been a win if Allen doesn't get hit throwing to Shakir to make it a possibility win and then all of a sudden we're better?
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, prissythecat said:
There are 0 people outside of a few on this board who would argue that the Bills are better than the Chiefs. The objective record for the Chiefs speaks for itself. 4 Superbowl appearances and 3 Super Bowl wins in the last 5 seasons. The objective record of the Bills in last 5 seasons? 1 appearance in the AFC championship game and 4 early round exits in the playoffs.
Do you think we can't beat the Chiefs if we play a mistake free game? Would we have no shot at all? They have beat us by one score the last 2 times. One was in a coaching blunder. Another, Allen gets hit when he throws the ball. Who know what happens. Could we have lost still? Yes. But it's not like the Chiefs have dominated us
Is OT in the playoffs still broken?
in The Stadium Wall
Posted
No, I love it. I always hated the sudden death that it originally was