Jump to content

Buffalo03

Community Member
  • Posts

    4,873
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Buffalo03

  1. 3 minutes ago, gonzo1105 said:

    Yes, they will have a first round bye to play for. I suspect the Steelers lose next week. That means the Steelers will have 3 losses and the Jags 4 losses. They will have the same conference record so the last week will be very important to both teams pending the Jags win out until they face the Titans

    The Jags also have the head to head against the Steelers as well. A Steelers loss next week possibly makes the Jags playing for the #2 seed week 17

  2. 11 minutes ago, PABillsfan23 said:

    It would be a minor miracle if the Bills got in the playoffs even at 9-7.  Need so many things to happen.  

    We actually don't need that much. If us and the Titans both finish 9-7, we have the tie breaker. I can see the Titans losing to the Rams and Jags

     

    I don't see the Ravens losing 3 of their next 4. But if they lose tonight that goes a long way

     

    The Chargers and Chiefs play each other next week. One of them has to lose and I hope it's the Chiefs that lose because we are gonna want the Chargers to win that division

     

    I actually think the Titans are the most important team in this whole thing. We have the head to head with them at 9-7. Baltimore has the head to head with us at 9-7 but even if the Ravens were to go 11-5 we can still get in at 9-7 if the Titans also finish 9-7 and the Chargers in the division

  3. 20 minutes ago, BadLandsMeanie said:

    I noticed that yesterday. During Eric Wood's segment it seemed like the ad break lasted almost ten minutes.

     

     

    I've thought this as well. I noticed this as well years ago. It took me 15 minutes to get to work one time and I wanted to listen to WGR on the way there. I ended up getting what seemed like nearly the entire 15 minutes of commercials and didn't actually get to listen to anytbing until I pulled into my parking lot at work. 

  4. So I was playing around with the ESPN Playoff Machine and I found one particular scenario interesting. I'll get to that in a moment but first

     

    We are going to obviously need to take at least 3 of the last 4. We might need to take all 4 but 3 of the last 4 still puts us in a pretty good position

     

    We can make the playoffs at 9-7 even if the Ravens go 10-6 as long as the Titans go 9-7 as well. I think it's possible the Titans go 9-7 they have the Cardinals this week in AZ. I think the Cardinals have a shot at this game. If the Cardinals are able to take it, the Titans then have the 49ers, Rams and Jags. I could see them losing 3 of the next 4 more than I can see the Ravens losing 3 of their next 4

     

    If us and the Titans go 9-7 we have the tie breaker

     

    The scenario I find interesting is, lets say us, the Ravens and the Chiefs all finish 9-7 and the Chargers win the division. Somehow the Chiefs would get the 5th seed and the Ravens the 6th seed. I don't know how this is possible considering we have the head to head with KC. So if we both finish with the same record we should be in front of them.

     

    Does anyone know how this is possible? Or could it be possible the playoff machine is wrong?

  5. 59 minutes ago, Putin said:

    I’m more concerned with our game plan on offense , 

    I really hope we come out swinging and NOT just in the first half BUT for 60 minutes

     ( regardless of the score ) and if we still lose so be it , 

    Our defense will have to show up as well , just like they did against KC , 

    This was my thought as well. I think we should come out the first play of the game and throw it deep downfield to let them know that we are ready to play. I know we need to run the ball but I think we need to come out swinging with some pass plays first

  6. Just now, 26CornerBlitz said:

     

    Likewise if you think he was key on those 98-99 teams. Carry on. 

    See, you're twisting words. I'm not saying he was the KEY but he was certainly a big part of them making the playoffs. Johnson would not have taken us there because he was freaking horrible. Also, do you think Jim Kelly and Thurman Thomas and Andre Reed and all them weren't egotistical jerks? Jim Kelly was a huge jerk but he was a team player just like Flutie was

  7. 3 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

     

    He was a little jerk as any of his teammates will say and it was the Bills' excellent D designed by Wade that took the Bills to the Playoffs. 

    If you think Flutie didn't take us to the playoffs you're an idiot. We did have the number 1 defense but there is no way we go to the playoffs if Johnson plays the entire season in 98 or 99. We gave Johnson 2000 and 2001 and what happened? He failed

    • Thank you (+1) 1
  8. 2 hours ago, Gugny said:

     

    Yes.  That's exactly what I'm saying.  Flutie cared about one thing:  Flutie.  And the same goes for Tyrod.  Ironically, they both suck and will both be ex-Bills soon.

    Flutie was a team guy. I'm not quite sure why anyone would think the guy was selfish. I didn't get that vibe at all. Is it because he was mad that that our stupid front office and coaching staff decided to go with Johnson over him? Because Flutie had every reason to be pissed off about that. He was clearly the better player and took us to the playoffs

  9. 17 minutes ago, Gugny said:

     

    It's just more proof that he's Flutie 2.0.

     

    He cares about being the starter.  He cares about making the Pro Bowl.  Winning is secondary.

     

    Can't wait till he's gone.

    Are you seriously saying Flutie didn't care about winning as much as playing? He played with heart every single week. Tyrod doesn't even compare to Flutie in any aspect of the game. I cannot believe someone actually wrote this. Wow

  10. 1 hour ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

    Total chances?

    Does it really matter? Lmao. You're talking about 11 years worth of him beating blitzes with at least 6 players. He has 70 TDs and 0 INTs. He's also only been sacked 17 times. I really don't think number of chances matter

  11. On 11/16/2017 at 9:22 PM, dayman said:

    Poisoned relationship in Indy. Coming of a season where he has a bad injury that is shrouded in mystery and potentially really bad long term for his shoulder. Perhaps a reasonable price is on his head (maybe only 1 1st or something). 

     

    Lets get crazy. 

    Overrated

    3 hours ago, Call_Of_Ktulu said:

     

    The Saints took a chance and traded for a QB with a shoulder injury. If there is any chance you can get Luck for two 1st rd picks and a 2nd rd pick you do it in a heart beat.

    Pretty sure Brees was released not traded for

  12. 1 hour ago, Domdab99 said:

    WHy does everyone think Alex Smith or Kirk Cousins would do any better than Tyrod as a stop-gap? It's absurd. Let's Alex Smith put up the same numbers with the supporting cast Tyrod has had. 

    Kirk Cousins would be more than a stop gap. Smith maybe but not Cousins. I'd still rather sign him no matter how much money it is over possibly drafting another J.P. Losman or E.J Manuel

  13. I almost feel like this franchise has been losing on purpose for the last 17 years. There is just no other way around it. It is impossible to miss the playoffs for 17 straight seasons. Now it is going on 18. We have done the impossible. There is no way that one particular team could possibly be so bad at everything for nearly 20 years. Not drafting right, bad coaching hires, bad coaching decisions, constantly finding ways to lose games in the closing minutes. We have even changed ownership and it's still no different. Year after year, regime after regime, bad draft after bad draft, always finding ways to lose games that we have no business losing, there is just no other way to explain this to me. I think this franchise loves losing and making fools out of their fans and watching us all act like the sky is falling. Call me crazy, I'd like to think this is not the case but I just can't look past it anymore and until they show otherwise that is exactly what I will keep thinking.

  14. 2 minutes ago, billsfan_34 said:

    No thanks- 30-35 mil a year for a qb that is a little above average. Lets draft our guy

    You won't have to pay him that much money. He would only make that much money by being on the franchise tag for a 3rd straight year, otherwise we could get him for between $20-$25 million a season. I wouldn't call him a little above average either. He's a fairly good QB if you ask me

  15. 6 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

    Nope. If the last 3 games have taught us anything, it's this:  this team is nowhere near being able to compete. That tells me that it's time to go with a rookie QB

    The problem with this though, is if you miss in the draft then you set this team back another 5 years. With our track record of drafting the past 17 years we will most likely end up drafting the wrong guy. Cousins easily has another 10 years ahead of him. It would be the same as drafting our own guy except we would be paying him a lot more money up front

×
×
  • Create New...