Buffalo03
-
Posts
5,942 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Buffalo03
-
-
25 minutes ago, smuvtalker said:
OMFG that is horrible. I don't agree with that at all. Call me old-fashioned or something, but I don't think there was anything wrong with the old seeding. If it ain't broke don't fix it! At least I didn't think it was broke.
I was perfectly ok with only 6 seeds but I always thought the division winners should make the playoffs but not be guaranteed a home playoff game. So essentially, a 7-9 division winner would make it but be a 6 seed as opposed to one of the top 4
-
1
-
-
14 hours ago, hondo in seattle said:
This is old news but the Seattle Times ran a nice article today about how the Bills almost picked Wilson.
It sounds like David Lee really wanted him:
Quarterbacks coach David Lee made a video presentation to offensive coordinator Chan Gailey showing that Wilson’s height wouldn’t be the problem some were thinking, showing “that Wilson’s over-the-top throwing motion made him deliver the ball taller than 6-foot-7 Brock Osweiler, who had a lower release,” per The Athletic.
Clearly, TJ Graham was more important
-
I like this but only if the donuts are all chocolate glazed
-
I would like to think if this was the Bills playing this way against the Giants. The doom and gloomers would crying about how bad we are and McDermott is a fraud and being out coached, the team is a joke and will only win 8 games. The whole 9
-
1
-
1
-
-
-
Can all these doom and gloomers stop posting permanently if we win? People freaking out about every little thing. RELAX. my God
-
1
-
-
I became a Bills fan because my Uncle is a huge Bills fan. I was 6 years old the year we went to the first Super Bowl which was the 92 season. The first game I ever remember watching was the no punt game. Seeing both offenses going back and forth, I just remember being entertained and just sitting on the floor and watching the game with my family. And being able to watch Kelly, Reed and Thomas on that explosive offense. I got hooked. Never looked back
-
4 minutes ago, NewEra said:
you’re saying different things.
Tbh, I don’t care anymore. Belichick is a product of Brady. Think w/e you like. For the next 30 years, get all mad and grit your teeth when you hear every analyst refer to Beleichick as the GOAT.
I'm not saying different things. You just can't comprehend. I'm saying Belichick is a GOOD coach and COULD HAVE WON A SB OR 2 WITHOUT BRADY. However, BRADY took BELICHICK to the next level and made BELICHICK who he is and his 54-66 RECORD without BRADY is a good argument to prove this
-
1
-
-
7 minutes ago, NewEra said:
Yet you say you gave credit to Belichick.....lol. You’re all over the place bruh.
I did give credit to belichick earlier in the thread. You said I can't read. You're the one who obviously needs to
9 minutes ago, NewEra said:Yet you say you gave credit to Belichick.....lol. You’re all over the place bruh.
Never said he wasn't good. I'm just saying I think he gets too much credit for what he did in NE. Could he gave won a SB or two without Brady? Maybe. but he wouldn't have gotten to 11 championship games or whatever it was and 6 SBs without Brady. Give him a number of years without the greatest QB of all time and see what happens. If he gets to another SB without him, I will gladly eat crow
-
Just now, NewEra said:
What is the bolded for?
-
7 minutes ago, NewEra said:
dude.......You can’t be serious. Can you read? I’m not making it sound like that at allim saying it’s both of them. Both are great.
you’re saying that’s ITS ALL BRADY. This is comical
Even if it's a mix of both, it's more Brady than Belichick. Period. Brady is still proving it in Tampa. I did acknowledge that Belichick is a good coach and may have won a SB or 2 without Brady but he wasn't getting 6. Belichick's career record without Brady is 54-66. The two of them together were great but Brady took it to the next level
-
3 minutes ago, NewEra said:
What are you even talking about man?
You’re just making stuff up. Please......where did I say it’s all Belichick? I’ll save you the time.....I didn’t say it. You won’t find it anywhere.
BRADY IS THE GOAT. BELICHICK HELPED HIM ACHIEVE GOAT STATUS, JUST LIKE BRADY HELPED BELICHICK ACHIEVE GOAT STATUS. It doesn’t have to be one OR the other. It can be BOTH. It IS both.
like I said to other dude, have fun with this, it’s not an enjoyable discussion. I’m out. Have fun.
You're making it sound like all of NEs success is on Belichick. You make it sound like 11 championship games and 6 SBs would have happened regardless of who the QB was. I'm telling you Belichick is who he is and had that success because of Brady. His record prior and after Brady proves that you have to at least consider that.
-
15 minutes ago, NewEra said:
And Brady wouldn’t have gotten to 11 championship games without Belichick.
jordan didn’t make it to one finals without Scottie or phil. Jordan gets to much credit.
Phil didn’t make it to any finals without Jordan or Kobe. Phil gets too much credit. He has 11 titles, but none without goat type talents
steph couldn’t win an nba title without Kerr. Steph gets too much credit.
john wooden was a helluva coach. One of the best ever, but he gets too much credit. Kareem, Walton, Hazzard and Goodrich made him look better than he was. No
Jimmie Johnson is overrated, he wouldn’t have won anything if the cowboys weren’t so stacked. What did he accomplish in Miami?
you can make this argument for many greats. Championships and sustained dominance isn’t achieved by one athlete or one coach.
You’re entitled to you opinion. It doesn’t mean many people will agree with you. At my fantasy football draft this year, I had 3 guys screaming at the top of their lungs telling me how brady was a product of Belichick after i drafted Brady in the last round. It’s their opinion. Their entitled. Doesn’t mean that they’re right.Brady + Belichick = the best QBs coach combo ever. Both have jobs that are graded on wins/losses and titles and each of them have achieved more than any other coach or QB in league history.
sure, you can debate it, and you do a sound job of debating it.....but you didn’t change my mind. You just sound like a bitter hater to me. Jmo
Before we hear about this covid nonsense? Lol. They lost several starters on both sides of the ball. How can you say that doesn’t matter? Obviously.....because it fits your argument
look at the patriots current roster. Seriously, look at it.
brady didn’t play well vs us for the last few seasons. McDermott had his number. Belichicks D had our number x10.
I'm not a hater. You just can't say that it's all Belichick when you look at what he did in Cleveland in 5 years there which was nothing. A 5-11 season his first year in NE without Brady 0-2 the next season before Bledsoe gets hurt without Brady. Look what Brady is doing now in TB. If the Bucs win the next 3 Superbowls and Brady is there for all 3, are you gonna talk about how amazing Bruce Arians is? How you can say it's more Belichick and not Brady is beyond me
-
1
-
-
36 minutes ago, hondo in seattle said:
I'm actually impressed with what Belichick did with Cassel. Here's how Wikipedia sums up Cassel's year as Brady's replacement:
By the end of the 2008 season, Cassel had become the first quarterback in NFL history to record at least 10 wins, 325 completions, a 63% completion mark, 3,600 passing yards, 20 touchdown passes, 11 or fewer interceptions, and 250 rushing yards in a single season.
Cassel didn't reprise that level of excellence with the Bills. Or with any other team he played for. His best year was under Belichick because Belichick is a mastermind.
When Charlie Weis was Belichick's OC, people thought he was a genius. I think his post-Belichick record disproves that opinion.
As a great head coach, Belichick makes his players and coaches look good - better than they'd be somewhere else.
Cassell also played on a team that was 16-0 the year before and was one game way from a perfect season. That 08 team still had pretty much all those same players. It doesn't matter who Belichick had that season, the Pats were not gonna go from a near 19-0 record the year before to 3-13 the next year and even if you make that argument for one fluke year for Cassell, he still did nothing with any other QB he had
-
32 minutes ago, NewEra said:
Ok, you’re right. Belichick isn’t good. MY BAD.Never said he wasn't good. I'm just saying I think he gets too much credit for what he did in NE. Could he gave won a SB or two without Brady? Maybe. but he wouldn't have gotten to 11 championship games or whatever it was and 6 SBs without Brady. Give him a number of years without the greatest QB of all time and see what happens. If he gets to another SB without him, I will gladly eat crow
-
4 minutes ago, hondo in seattle said:
I think the relationship between Brady and Belichick was symbiotic. I think Brady had a lot of innate talent and drive. But I think Belichick and his coaching staff helped Brady develop his full potential. Neither Brady nor Belichick would be as great without the other.
You look at HOF coaches and they all had great QBs. Levy had Kelly. Landry had Staubach. Bud Grant had Tarkenton. Jimmy had Aikman. Noll had Bradshaw. Walsh had Montana and Young.
It's the which-came-first-the-chicken-or-egg argument. Do great coaches make qbs great? Or do great qbs make coaches great? It's a little of both, I think.
.
I don't think Belichick had any part in Brady's development. Brady was just naturally good. He didn't do anything else with any other QB he had, Kosar, Testaverde, Bledsoe, Cassel, Newton, Stidham. But he figured it out with Brady? Belichick gets too much credit for that. As I stated before, Adam Gase could have went to Super Bowls and had great success with Brady as his QB. Peyton Manning gave Gase the only success he has ever had in this league and he has gotten two head coaching jobs because of it. It was 20 years of Brady, not Belichick of why they had so much success. If you think the Pats even make the playoffs the year Bledsoe got drilled by Moe Lewis to make way for Brady and get to the SB, you're insane
-
1
-
1
-
-
34 minutes ago, NewEra said:
How many Super Bowls did parcels win without Belichick? Belichick beat us in the SB when he was with the giants with a backup QB.
your take on the matter is inconsequential imo. Only the biggest haters would agree with you that he’s not the greatest, if not one of the greatest coaches of all time. He is absolutely a football genius, guru, mastermind....whatever you don’t want to call him. He just is
He really is the worst “analyst” on tv. This should be his last
It doesn't matter if parcells didn't win Super Bowls without Belichick. Parcells was an amazing head coach and turned around every franchise he took over. Even the Cowboys with no Belichick. He took over for Dave Campo and took Quincy freaking Carter to the playoffs his first year in Dallas. Who knows what would have happened in his last year there if Romo doesn't mess up holding the snap on a field goal to win the game in the playoffs. And as far as Belichick being on that Giants team that beat us in the SB, if the Bills weren't so stubborn and actually took what Belichick was giving them, that "amazing" game plan wouldn't even exist. Belichick said himself that they were "inviting" us to run the football and he was hoping we didn't because they knew they were gonna be in trouble. Thurman Thomas only ran the ball like 15 times and had over 130 yards. Imagine if we would have stuck with that more in the game, it could have been a lot different. The Bills from back then said, it didn't matter what the Giants did, they were living and dying with what got them there. If we weren't so stubborn, could have been a big difference
-
1
-
-
6 minutes ago, TroutDog said:
I’d dispute this. BB is an incredible coach, probably the best ever and, certainly, a HOF’er.
I am as glad to see their apparent demise as much as the next Bills fan but will never underestimate BB. Once he clears out the cap and restocks the cupboard, he’ll turn them around...again.
He needs to get to a SB without Brady to prove he didn't ride on Brady. Brady is the best QB ever. Any coach could have ridden Brady to even a couple SBs. Adam Gase would look great with Brady. He did nothing in Cleveland and didn't do anything his first year and two games in NE before Bledsoe got hurt and Brady came in and started history for them. People bring up the 2008 season where Brady was gone the whole year but that was also the year coming off a 16-0 season with pretty much the same team as the year before. No matter what QB he had, he was not gonna win 5 games after a 16-0 season. If he coaches for 5 more years and never sees another SB or doesn't get to the playoffs a couple times.or is one and done a few times, I think it proves he rode on the greatest QBs back his whole career
-
1
-
-
8 hours ago, LABILLBACKER said:
Last year's Cowboys win wasn't really a signature win although it did give us some national exposure. Beat NE twice and either Seattle or Arizona and that would be a signature sequence.
That Seattle game actually scares the hell out of me. I feel like that's gonna be reminiscent of that Bears game in 2018 that Peterman started where we got manhandled
-
I was only 6 years old at the time so I don't have much memory of it but it was said on WGR a few months ago that in 1992 toward the end of the season, the Bills were trying to get to their 3rd straight Super Bowl and from what I believe Bulldog or maybe it was Sal Capaccio said was the Bills lost to a really bad Jets team at home toward the end of that season and the Jets were even like 15 point underdogs or something like that. Luckily, we turned it around in the playoffs and did get to the 3rd straight Super Bowl but I found it interesting that even our greatest teams had big bumps in the road a time or two
-
1 minute ago, Augie said:
We missed the payoffs for 17 straight seasons. Now, it looks like we will make it 3 of 4 seasons during a rebuild. This is not even a serious question.
Yeah, don't get me wrong, the defense has been awful this year but it's been bad all around the league. Like last year I remember Harrison Phillips was playing at a high level before his injury and got beyter from year one to year 2 and now he is getting benched. They're just off right now
-
I think there is still a clear overreaction here. Sure, we have some issues defensively but we have built a solid defense the first 3 years under his watch and the offense even got better. We have to fix things but in his defense, most teams have had a down year defensively. I'm not sure if it was the change in offseason activities and no pre season but I feel like we are a talented team, we're just off right now. I have seen enough over Beane's 4 years here to tell me what him and McDermott has built is good. A whole bunch of players don't go from 3 solid seasons to all of a sudden being really bad at football in one year. Something is off but it's not lack of talent
-
1
-
-
Ok. Can we leave Zimmer in the game, please?
-
I hope we can beat the Chiefs but I feel like this could be a repeat of the Titans game. Mainly because of the Chiefs coming off a loss to. They are gonna be hungry for that win after a let down. If we had a packed stadium with fans being loud, that would make me feel better about this game. I know we're gonna be coming off a loss to but the Chiefs are gonna be coming out swinging
Week 10: Bills at Cardinals
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
What are the odds that we get Nance and Romo this week? According to NFL.com, there are only 3 games on CBS this week and all are on at 4pm. Nance and Romo have to be doing one of them whch might end up being Chargers vs Dolphins