Buffalo03
-
Posts
5,617 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Buffalo03
-
-
19 minutes ago, MasterStrategist said:
This year Kenneth Grant is being told to me by multiple people I trust in the know.
Just passing along...never know on draft night how the board will shake out. But this will require a trade up IMO
Can you ask your sources for schedule leaks in a few weeks?
-
18 minutes ago, Simon said:
Would you rather get held down by a huge dude and ass-raped or lose a fight and your car?
I personally wouldn't want either. But I also wouldn't wait 30 years to report or sue someone for it
-
1
-
-
4 minutes ago, HappyDays said:
Then I'm afraid you are just completely disconnected from reality. If you don't understand the differences between what rape victims experience when they report their crime versus what car theft victims experience when they report their crime, especially back in the 90s, this is not a conversation worth having.
It has nothing to do with the crime committed. What we're talking about is the experience of reporting the crime. You're the one that made this ridiculous on the face of it analogy and now you're refusing to acknowledge the differences.
Like I said, you're not engaging in good faith. I did try.
What do you mean I'm not engaging in good faith? Does that mean I'm supposed to agree with you? I'm answering your question. I'm saying both crimes are bad and can cause physical harm and bad memories for the woman that it happens to. Anyone can experience different violent crimes. If it's violent, I don't think the analogy is ridiculous. Take the car theft out of it. If a woman is simply walking down the street and gets beaten badly and doesn't report it for 20 years, you're cool with the fact she chose to ignore it. But give her a pass because for the other violent incident. Either one should be reported in a timely matter. What I am saying is, a lawsuit for something that happened or "apparently" happened 30 years ago would be something to question
-
2
-
-
1 minute ago, HappyDays said:
Ok sure, I'm a glutton for punishment.
Do you believe the administrator's response would have been "please don't report the car thief, you'll ruin his future"?
If it's "ruining a black man's future" as the article puts it, I don't see why it would be any different, no. Is a team gonna draft a guy with with a physical assault that gave someone personal brain damage? I'd be willing to bet most teams would remove them off their draft board
4 minutes ago, HappyDays said:Ok sure, I'm a glutton for punishment.
Do you believe the administrator's response would have been "please don't report the car thief, you'll ruin his future"?
And again, you are ignoring the assault and just like anyone else just focusing on the car theft
-
3 minutes ago, Einstein said:
Yes.They can both cause a lifetime of physical harm, correct? Shouldn't they both be reported sooner?
3 minutes ago, HappyDays said:I tried to meet you at your level but you won't engage in good faith. That's what I expected. Have a good one man.
Why don't you tell me what you mean? I can't answer your question because you are asking me how someone would have responded to something when I am not that particular person. Therefore, I don't have an answer to give you. That's like saying how do you think his person would respond to calling them fat?" I couldn't tell you. I'm not them
-
Just now, Bruffalo said:
"It's not a valid crime unless it's promptly reported" is a really weird hill to die on.
Well, the quicker something gets reported, the more I personally would believe it. The longer it goes and the more rich the person is that has allegations against them, the less it gets believed. You act like women have never lied before
Just now, HappyDays said:I will probably regret this but I'll try to meet you at your level on this.
Starting with a question - if a woman went to the Columbia school administration and said "this student beat me up and stole my car" what do you believe would have been the administrator's response?
I honestly don't know
-
2
-
-
5 minutes ago, oldmanfan said:
I am presuming you are a guy. Ask yourself this: would you rather have a hand of say 3 guys beat you up and steal your car? Or would you rather have those 3 guys strip you naked and violate your rear entrance repeatedly? Which do you think would have a more lasting psychological effect?
Let's take the guy part out of it. I should have used the woman as the example in both instances. The point is, they should both be reported in a timely matter. The longer it takes, the worse it looks for the woman. That's all I am saying
-
Just now, oldmanfan said:
You are truly being moronic now. As I said go ask your significant other.
Being moronic how? So forced sex is the problem? But not being beaten to pulp and getting permanent brain damage? I'm done
-
5 minutes ago, Doc Brown said:
What? There's an abundance of research out there that victims of rape are significantly less likely to report it than other forms of assault. I would maybe do a little research or just sit this one out.
It doesn't matter. Any kind of violent crime should be reported in a timely matter. A regular assault can cause lifetime physical harm just as much as a rape could. The longer it takes to report, the more ridiculous it looks and the less likely the person it to be believed
-
2
-
-
Just now, oldmanfan said:
Ask your significant other these questions. If you have one.
Lol. So, a woman is gonna say "I don't care if I'm beaten badly and get permanent brain damage from it as long as he doesn't try to force sex on me, it's all good"? I really don't care how someone tries to spin it, they are both bad. But one gets a lifetime pass and the other would be looked at as ridiculous 20+ years later.
1 minute ago, Gugny said:
One of us is likely to not survive this thread.
In the name of self-preservation, I’m done playing your silly, biased hypothetical game.
Good day.
Lol ok
-
3 minutes ago, Gugny said:
Well, since you asked…it is my opinion that rape is worse than murder.
I think it’s the worst thing any woman can be forced to live through.
And I think comparing it to a man getting beaten up and having his car stolen is …
Bless your little heart.
Again, as you so graciously ignored, the last comment I made to you was if you put a woman in BOTH scenarios, why does she get a pass for a rape but not an assault that leaves her with possible permanent brain damage? They are both violent crimes and should be reported in a timely matter. One should not get a pass over the other
-
1
-
-
20 minutes ago, Simon said:
Yeah, she's clearly getting a pass while you compare rape to car theft.
Maybe you should sit this one out, chief.
Did you miss the part where I said assault and car theft? Or did you leave that out intentionally?
21 minutes ago, Gugny said:
Bless your little heart.How about you answer the question. Is rape worse than being beaten to a pulp and getting your car taken away? If it was a woman in both scenarios, and she chose not to report either or for 20 plus years, you would be ok with her waiting to report the rape but not the assault? One violent crime gets a pass and the other doesn't? OK then
-
1
-
-
3 minutes ago, Doc Brown said:
I'm not saying that's better or worse than rape so don't strawman me. Never experienced either. You're more likely to report being beaten a pulp and your car stolen than being raped though. I'm just going by the research man.
You have absolutely no proof of that. How about we put a woman in this scenario. Would you believe her and think she should get paid if she was assaulted and beaten and had her car stolen 23 years ago and is now looking to file a lawsuit? Or is it only in rape cases that she is "telling the truth" and that's ok?
-
5 minutes ago, Doc Brown said:
You just answered your own question.
No, I didn't. The main reason I brought this up is assault and rape or whatever, should be reported in a timely matter. And the longer you wait the more ridiculous it looks. So, if someone gets beaten to a pulp and has their car stolen, that's a lot better than rape? They are both crimes that would harm either individual but one person gets a pass and the other gets criticized. Assault and rape are both major crimes
-
If I was assaulted and beaten and had my car stolen in 2002 and I just now came forward with it with a lawsuit, how would that look? How is it also any different from this? Granted, rape and the situation I'm referring to are different allegations. But the time frame of reporting would cause concerns, correct? I bet all the people saying "women should be able to report 20, 30, 40 year old rape allegations" would also be asking why it took so long for a person to report an assault and theft of property over 20 years later, right? Why do women always get a pass in this case?
-
1
-
3
-
-
3 hours ago, Sweats said:
And i actually agree with a large portion of this......
If the allegations are false and people are "gold diggers", then why come after the guy 30 years later when he probably doesn't have too much of a pot to piss in. I mean, you'd probably want to go after him when he was actually earning a significant NFL paycheck.
So, all of this is just screaming to me that these women do have some validation that "something" happened 30 years ago and my thinking is that i would tend to lean to this mindset.
I can't see too many women coming forward with a false narrative, looking for a free handout from a guy with probably very little money left when his NFL heyday would have been the time to do it, so it tells me these women may actually have a point of rightful allegation of one point or other.
The longer it takes for women to come out, the harder they are to believe. And him being an ex NFL player, you don't think he has somewhat of a nice nest egg? Maybe the women themselves have been in better financial situations over the last 30 years. A lot can happen to people in that time. Someone may be financially stable at one point in their life and then for a number of reasons, something happens and they become desperate for money. I personally feel the smartest thing for any woman to do is report is as soon as possible. If he did this to 10 different women at the same time and not one says something over 30 years and then boom he is hit with 10 all at once 30 years later, it just screams money grab to me. Maybe it isn't but I do agree, woman should come out sooner
-
1
-
-
I mean, he is in some ways. Not every throw he makes is on the run or outside the pocket
-
That stadium is only 26 years old. Why the rush?
-
1
-
-
Me. I can be CB2. I will be 39 at the end of the month. I'm 5'10 240 pounds and probably run about an 8 second 40 time. What do you all think?
-
I just hope if he actually stays healthy and Balls out that the Bills do decide to bring him back, though and that this isn't his final year for us regardless
-
2
-
-
40 minutes ago, ddaryl said:
They are only out of control if you are tired of spending $1000's a year watching the NFL. If you are not tired of paying for tickets, streaming services, and memorabilia etc.. then this is exactly what you are paying for.
Until the fans make a statement with their wallets and pocketbooks not a single thing will change. Myself I spend maybe $300 a year for the Sunday ticket but last year I waited till the 2nd half before I even made the purchase at a discount.Teams can't afford paying every position $30 or $40 million a year and as you said, if I am paying for tickets, I wanna see a good product. When you have to let some good players go because you are paying DBs $30 million a year, then it isn't intriguing to the fan
-
These contracts are getting out of hand. Soon teams will be paying punters $20 million a year
-
1
-
3
-
1
-
1
-
-
Single digit numbers for anyone that's not a QB is just stupid. A LB wearing 8?
-
1
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, mikemac2001 said:
I think it should be 4th and 20 I think 4th and 15 will be to easy for some teams
this needs to still be a challange to get I don’t like the idea of teams getting two late scores to steal games
4th and 15 isn't that easy. It's one down to get 15 yards. And if you don't want a team getting 2 late scores to steal games, stop them. The whole argument of "that team dominated for 75% of the game so the other team should have a harder time of winning it" is stupid. If a team is up by 21 late and let's up 2 TDs or 2 TDs and a FG in the 4th quarter, and now the other team has a chance with a minute or 2 left, that's their problem. Now they have to stop them again on 4th &15 from the 30. I'm all for it
Bills First Rnd pick in 2025 draft: Maxwell Hairston - CB - Kentucky
in The Stadium Wall
Posted
"You make a grown man cryyyyyyy"