-
Posts
4,569 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by ChiGoose
-
I'm sorry, I'm just having difficulty understanding what your concern around the 3 day rule is. According to Nevada election laws: Ballots delivered by hand have to be in by 7pm on Election Day Ballots received within three days of Election Day were almost certainly mailed on or before Election Day, so they are acceptable Ballots received four days after Election Day may have been mailed after Election Day and therefore require to have been postmarked on or before Election Day Ballots received five days after Election Day are not accepted even if postmarked on or before Election Day All ballots are verified before being counted Where is the issue here? Is the concern that hundreds or thousands of people are going to mail in their ballot the day after Election Day and have them somehow arrive within two days?
-
-
According to the law and court ruling, the clerk may accept ballots that are postmarked up to four days after Election Day and ballots without a postmark up to three days after Election Day. According to the court: "“If a voter properly and timely casts their vote by mailing their ballot before or on the day of the election, and through a post office omission the ballot is not postmarked, it would go against public policy to discount that properly cast vote,” the justices wrote in their order. “Rejecting timely mail ballots because of postal service omissions cuts against the strong public interest in exercising the right to vote,” the justices said. “Notably, the RNC presented no evidence or allegations that counting mail ballots without postmarks under [state law] would be subject to voter fraud, or that the election security measures currently in place are inadequate to address its concerns regarding these ballots.” (source) The logic here is that if a ballot arrives within three days after Election Day, it was almost certainly mailed before Election Day given the speed of the mail. If the Post Office neglected to postmark it, that is not the fault of the voter. Additionally, once a ballot is received by the clerk, it still undergoes verification before being counted.
-
MSG was such a great show for Trump. His supporters should definitely share videos of it to their friends and on their social media. That comedian was hilarious. Everyone should see his bit from a podium with Trump’s name on it.
-
Not sure how fast the mail is where you are but if I dropped a card to be sent to my neighbor in the mailbox down the block, it’s probably going to take at least three days. Remember that mail in ballots are still verified before they are counted. This is just acknowledging the reality that if mail arrives, it was probably sent at least three days prior.
-
Big news! For every $1 you spent on DJT at its IPO, you’d have $0.607 today! If you bought enough stock at the beginning you might still have some money left for Trump Shoes, Trump NFTs, or a Trump Watch!
-
So I want to be very clear, there’s a difference between counting all of the ballots (which has never been done on Election Day) and counting enough ballots for the media to be able to call the presidential election on Election Day. I’d be curious as to what percentage of ballots are outstanding after Election Day as well as what their cutoff is for ballots postmarked by Election Day.
-
Even in 2020 where we had higher than normal vote by mail due to the pandemic and we had states with outdated laws for counting vote by mail, it took fewer than 4 days for the media to call the election. Not sure where you're getting 10-14 days from. I agree that long counting times feed anxieties and conspiracies, which is why I think states should adopt laws similar to the first two columns my original post for quicker counting.
-
The election has never been officially decided by election night, it's just rarely been so close that the media isn't able to make projections (which they can do incorrectly like they did in 2000 when Florida was called for Gore by some outlets before they had to walk it back). We are incredibly polarized now and elections are closer, being decided by tens of thousands of voters across a couple of states. It's not surprising that this, combined with some of those states (*cough* Pennsylvania and Wisconsin *cough*) not updating their laws to allow for quicker counting.
-
A lot of people have (justifiably) expressed frustration at how long it takes for some states to count their ballots, especially with the rise in voting by mail. While there have been people proposing eliminating mail-in voting or early voting, the real solution is simple: update state laws to allow for faster counting. This is what Florida did after the disaster in 2000 and why it is now regarded as one of the best at counting ballots quickly. We also have several states that conduct all of their voting by mail without issue. To understand what we can expect for which states will take longer, I have bucketed the states based on when they process mail-in ballots (verification, prepping for counting, etc) and when they are actually counted. States that process and count before Election Day will be able to release results quickly, while those that have later timelines may take days if the race is close. (source) Process and Count before Election Day Process before Election Day; Count at start of Election Day Process before Election Day; Count at end of Election Day Process and Count at start of Election Day Process start of Election Day; Count at end of Election Day Up to local officials Process before Election Day; Count not specified Arizona Arkansas Alaska Pennsylvania Alabama Connecticut Ohio Colorado* California* D.C. South Carolina Mississippi Oregon* Delaware Georgia Idaho West Virginia New Hampshire Oklahoma Florida Indiana Illinois Wisconsin South Dakota Hawaii Iowa Maine Kansas Kentucky Massachusetts Montana Louisiana Minnesota Nebraska Maryland Missouri Nevada* Michigan New Mexico New Jersey Tennessee New York Utah* Texas North Carolina North Dakota Rhode Island Vermont Virginia Washington* Wyoming *State does all votes by mail Projected 2024 swing state
-
Even the guy who oversaw a massive Medicare fraud scheme thinks the MSG rally was a bit much
-
Looks like the Trump campaign is clutching its pearls
-
I’d never heard of this Tony Hinchcliffe guy before but based on his speech, I have to assume he’s a Dem plant intent on helping out the Harris campaign…
-
When I saw the claim that ABC had given questions to Harris before the debate, I thought it could be possible. It wouldn’t be the first time there were some shenanigans around debates. So I looked at the claims, I checked out the affidavit. I saw some comment about Disney Media Networks being defunct, so I looked into that and confirmed that it was disbanded years ago. At that point, I thought it was pretty clear that this was a hoax. So you have no evidence other than conjecture and your tacit acknowledgment that she performed well. Which is why you’re moving the goalposts away from the whistleblower story. But honestly, what question at the debate was not predictable? Where was the “gotcha” she needed to be prepared for that any campaign adviser wouldn’t have been able to predict and prepare for?