Royale with Cheese

I have posted more than once the direct quotes from the FCC Chairman.

The reason they are changing is because the left is out of their minds. You admitted it several times that they are looking poor. But then you criticize them for leaving that party that is doing poor?????? Are they supposed to stay and support horrible policies? Why didn't the Dems do something positive to be looked at more positively? You don't believe in accountability. @Max Fischer Paging Max.

The media is without a doubt left leaning. ABC, CNBC, MSNBC, CNN are all left leaning. The entertainment industry is left leaning lol. Can you make sense? Between this and your Rolling Stone example....I mean come on lol.

LOLOLOLOL I know!

Answer the question. I watch anything I want to watch. Government isn't stopping me.

It's not my logic, it's directly from the FCC Chairman. “It was appearing to directly mislead the American public about a significant fact that probably one of the most significant political events we’ve had in a long time, for the most significant political assassination we’ve seen in a long time,” he said. “Squawk the Street” anchor Carl Quintanilla asked Carr about that on Thursday. “I asked earlier about Fallon and Seth Meyers, but is the President’s view that they should also be taken off the air, shared by the FCC?” Quintanilla asked. Carr replied,“I don’t speak for the President, so he speaks to himself on that.” “Our goal and our obligation here is to make sure that broadcasters are serving the public interest,” Carr said. “And I would simply say we’re not done yet with seeing the consequences of that,” he said. CNBC anchor David Faber followed up on that. “What does that mean when you say you’re done yet?” Faber asked. “Then, I mean, will you only be pleased when none of these comedians have a show on broadcast television?” Carr replied, “No, it’s not any particular show or any particular person. It’s just we’re in the midst of a very disruptive moment right now, and I just, frankly, expect that we’re going to continue to see changes in the media ecosystem. https://www.cnbc.com/2025/09/18/jimmy-kimmel-charlie-kirk-fcc-carr.html

I didn't blindly job in. I read the articles about this. You didn't. That's on you.

I completely forgot about that!! Dems: That is not racist.

How about this? Remember when you said we can't give the death penalty to Tyler Robinson because it would be too much trauma for his parents? Well, what is the trauma level of having to turn your son into the FBI knowing he will be tried for the death penalty? Should Tyler's parents have not turned him in because of the trauma?

The Government, in this case, the FCC has a job to do and that's protecting the integrity of communication. They acted on it. The FCC Chairman explained it their reasoning. That Chairman has been with the FCC for 20 years and not hired by Trump. Since you won't answer my question about Tyler Robinson, I will put that same question in the Execution thread. I will wait for your reply.

So what happened to Jimmy Kimmel was unfair. But fair to Roseanne. Got it. How about this. Remember when you said we can't give the death penalty to Tyler Robinson because it would be too much trauma for his parents? Well, what is the trauma level of having to turn your son into the FBI knowing he will be tried for the death penalty? Should Tyler's parents have not turned him in because of the trauma?

Answer the question. Lets say you're living next door to an illegal immigrant that is going to trial for a violent crime like rape or armed burglary or is a child predator. He can't go to trial for a few years because there's millions of other cases clogging up the court systems. Would you want to live next door to this man? Would you support this man and his due process? Are you really, and I mean really saying that the only way to prove they are illegal is through trial? You aren't really saying that are you? I work in HR, its very simple lol. But our Government won't be able to determine prior if people are illegal or legal? Really?

We are in a Jimmy Kimmel canceled thread. We are talking about Jimmy Kimmel.

Like what?

Are not not saying what happened to Kimmel is unfair?

So you believe that an illegal can skip the process to get into this country but deserve due process to get out of the country? To give due process to millions and millions of illegals, that will clutter up the courts. Let me ask you this straight up. Lets say you're living next door to an illegal immigrant that is going to trial for a violent crime like rape or armed burglary or is a child predator. He can't go to trial for a few years because there's millions of other cases clogging up the court systems. Would you want to live next door to this man? Would you support this man and his due process?

LOL Roseanne was canceled 3 years ago. Did Trump cancel Roseanne?

Perfectly said.

Its a person you said didn’t say existed. You very clearly stated no one believes this. But yes, this caller is part of a group that wants to normalize pedophilia. Yes it bothers me. When you have to put 10 million illegal aliens on trial, its going to cost tax payers money. It will delay other court cases because the mass amount of illegal immigrants their due process. Then you have criminals on the streets in a delayed trial. Just to let you know, a condo that I owned had a child sex trafficker living 2 doors from me. I had a 5 year old. We couldn’t remove him from the facility because he wasn’t convicted yet. His trial was pushed back because Covid. So he was able to live there for an extra 18 months because he wasn’t convicted yet. So if you put millions of illegals on trial, this happens everywhere. How much of your tax dollars and your paycheck are you willing to give to give these illegals a fair trial?

Here, from CNBC and not Fox News. Directly from the FCC Chairman. “It was appearing to directly mislead the American public about a significant fact that probably one of the most significant political events we’ve had in a long time, for the most significant political assassination we’ve seen in a long time,” he said. On Wednesday, before ABC yanked Kimmel’s show, Carr called Kimmel’s comments “truly sick” and said there was a “strong case” for action against ABC and Disney. “This is a very, very serious issue right now for Disney. We can do this the easy way or the hard way,” Carr told right-wing commentator Benny Johnson that day. “These companies can find ways to take action on Kimmel, or there is going to be additional work for the FCC ahead.” “They have a license granted by us at the FCC, and that comes with it an obligation to operate in the public interest,” Carr said. https://www.cnbc.com/2025/09/18/jimmy-kimmel-charlie-kirk-fcc-carr.html

Deny this conversation took place. https://www.instagram.com/reel/C8Zjt-Gu9Qr/?igsh=anc0aXh2cWw3ZGtj So you believe someone can skip the process to get int this country but they don’t have to skip the process to get out? Really?

So they are universally true right? If a Rolling Stone says it, it is without a doubt they're right? It's objective? Well I mean ABC had a direct chance to fight for Kimmel. Do you think they have Attorney's or not? And they didn't. Why didn't ABC fight it?

Oh, Rolling Stone says it so that means it's universally correct. No need for Attorney's, Rolling Stone Magazine spoke. Damn dude, you are easily influenced. Sounds like this is an easy and shut case for Kimmel. When is he going to sue the Government and get this incredibly easy victory? Also from Rolling Stone. https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/campaign-2024-democrats-failure-1235230952/ https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/democratic-party-brand-congress-bad-poll-1235394662/ https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/dems-struggle-register-voters-raise-money-midterms-1235412399/

The FCC didn't coerce them. ABC was facing liability. They made the decision to either fight it or get rid of Kimmel. They chose to get rid of Kimmel. It was ABC's decision, not the government. The government threatened a consequence for Kimmel's actions. ABC either wanted to fight it or not, they chose not to. They don't make a decision at this level without consulting Legal. Actions speak louder than words and what actions did ABC take?

Yeah and that’s a violation of integrity. You know who agrees with me? ABC and their Legal team. If it was a clear cut violation of Freedom of Speech and FCC abusing their powers…lets see that easy lawsuit.