RVJ

Get your Warrior action figures. http://warriorsmovie.co.uk/figures/

Some guys like to copy. Like me...my new Avatar. http://warriorsmovie.co.uk/fanpics/

I also part of the soundtrack on my pc. Anyways......anyone up for a Baseball Fury Tatoo. http://warriorsmovie.co.uk/fanpics/images/furiestattoo.jpg

Anyone ever see that movie....Its a great flick. I have the tape on it's on my pc. Anyway they are going to do a remake...due in 2006. It sounds like there going to screw up the remake. MTV Productions is producing a remake of The Warriors in conjunction with Paramount. Tony Scott is directing, and the movie is believed to have no guns with a focus on martial arts and street fighting. The movie is expected to be released in 2006. It won't be an actual "remake" of the 1979 film. Instead, it's going to be an updated version, probably set in the present day. From what I've heard they want to make a Matrix like Kung Fu movie and not a dedicated remake. So for all of you who were hoping that it would be set in 1979 NYC, sorry. The general theme and some of the names may stay intact but overall it's probably going to be completely different. Check out this link: http://www.moviepoopshoot.com/news/sep02/127.html. Keep up to date with all the developments here, and in the active remake forum (visited by the producer of the movie). Here is the original. http://warriorsmovie.co.uk/pictures/

I still have those exact ones in XL. They have been washed many times. They are as soft as a babys ass.

Maybe they won't give the Cards a draft pick anymore. But if he is released outright they might grab him. In fact if he is released the Bears are his first choice before Buffalo if they still want him.

I don't even know what 420 or 666 is.

Well you can put alot of different names on it . Here is a list of names that they will not allow you to use. Warning! Read at your own peril. http://outsports.com/nfl/2005/0301nflshopnaughtywords.htm

Rolle and Ty Law are both in the injured category. So if they are injured the more chance TD will make a deal.

Something for the next collective bargaining agreement. It expires in 2008. There could be some very interesting changes in the NFL . According to Gene Upshaw.......... The goal is to have an agreement by the end of the 2006 season. Otherwise, under the current deal, the 2007 season will be played without a salary cap, with no guarantee of reinstating one after that season. That could wreak havoc on the future of a league whose strength is creating an even playing field for all 32 teams, regardless of market size. An agreement could hinge on the owners accepting a drastic change in how revenue is defined. Currently, the league shares its "Designated Gross Revenues" (DGR) with the players. DGR does not include money from sources that aren't shared among teams, such as luxury suites. Upshaw said the union now wants to share in "Total Football Revenue" (TFR), which would include money from all revenue streams. Surprisingly, the owners haven't slammed the door on the idea, according to Upshaw. The top eight revenue-producing teams are balking, he said, but haven't taken a hard stance. At the Super Bowl, NFL Commissioner Paul Tagliabue said, "We have a long way to go in getting a consensus among the owners."

When he played with the Hurricanes. Now he wears a clear one with the Bills. I remember watching him run over people in college. That tinted shield made him stand out even more. Why is that not allowed in the NFL ? How come Kelly Herndon on the front page of ESPN gets to wear the tinted one. http://football.espn.go.com/nfl/index

Like Randy Moss...hey Randy nice TD but you were suppose to chip block on your way out.

I really would rather have Peerless if the Falcons cut him in June,

Seems if he doesn't sign the the Giants....that there are no more teams interested. I know he has character issues . But if we could get him cheap he would make a great third reciever and a big target. The Bills have never had a real tall reciever. Did TD draft Burress ?

No problem here.

For me its...I hate to pay one person that much money. Especially a corner. With the new rules that make them less effective. Then I look at the Pats using two rookies and a wideout for their corners.

One more bump....for those who missed this .

Do the Cards run a West Coast offense ?

You can post something without getting beat on. Everyones respecting other peoples opinions. And when they do disagree they are doing it with class. Keep up the great work !!!!

I think I would try to trade down also...Get as many quality picks as I could. I would want all the extra picks I recieved to be for next years draft.

I agree...but lets say he was replaced with Ty Law.

I left out QBs and RBs. Heres Kipers board to help out. And lets say we signed Ty Law. http://proxy.espn.go.com/melkiper/index.html

How would you feel with Ty Law . Then say a #1 pick for Clements . Then the Bills draft big Mike Williams the wideout....I would be pretty happy.

Didn't like: The Raiders franchised a lousy player, and now they might be stuck with him. His name is Charles Woodson, and his last great game was in Ann Arbor eight years ago. The Raiders, clearly trying to get some fish to bite on Woodson, franchised him before free agency began, meaning if a team wanted him, the team would have to trade the Raiders up to two first-round picks for him. (Oakland, certainly, would take less, because the guy has played so inconsistently as a pro.) But Woodson, as I said last week, surprised the Raiders by signing the franchise tender offer of $10.5 million. http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2005/writ...ing/03/07/mmqb/