Jump to content

transplantbillsfan

Community Member
  • Posts

    10,436
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by transplantbillsfan

  1. 29 minutes ago, Brand J said:

    I didn’t know Coleman played D1 college basketball, so right away he’s more likely to have better hands and body control than other receivers his size. That said, I can’t see him at 28, but agree with you for a trade down and picking him in the 2nd if it comes to that. If only we had a crystal ball, or access to a time traveler to tell us which receivers will pan out from this draft.

     

    There is also a financial component to taking Coleman in the 1st round if you're willing to trade down to the top of the 2nd to get him that Beane might be considering.  That 5th year option for a WR might matter here.

  2. Wow... that's interesting.  Dude's a starting caliber Guard.  It'd be really nice if Tommy Doyle could come back healthy, but not counting on that.  Let's hope Alec Anderson has developed into a Bates level backup and can play Center at least adequately.

  3. So I'm not saying I'm an advocate for drafting Keon Coleman in the 1st or anything, but I think way too much is being made of his 40 time at the Combine.  

     

    I realize all I'm going by is highlights, but his play speed looks plenty fine to me.

     

    First play at 18 seconds shows him plenty fast and elusive enough.

     

    Play at 1:51 looks like a guy with more agility and route running than Gabe.

     

    The next play (that you see from the All-22 at 2:10) shows pretty good route running ability along with the speed to separate from the defender.

     

    At 2:41 you see him used in a Bubble Screen with enough speed and agility to get away from the defender and get into the EZ.

     

    Watch his Punt return at 3:00 and tell me that a guy at that size returning a punt like that isn't impressive.

     

    Another effective Bubble Screen at 1:03

     

    Effective WR screen behind the LOS at 1:30

     

    I'm going to stop there.

     

    I've been listening to a lot of sports podcasts lately that aren't just Bills ones.  Move the Sticks with Daniel Jeremiah and Bucky Brooks.  First Draft with Field Yates and Mel Kiper Jr.  The Athletic Football Podcast with Nate Tice and (sometimes) Dane Brugler.

     

    What you hear a lot about the scouting process is the phrase "grade the flashes."  Basically, grade those players in their best moments.

     

    Keon Coleman in his best moments looks like a 1st round WR, to me.

     

    All that said, I do think his draft stock is down after the 40 time, so if we drafted Coleman, what I'd like to see us do is actually trade DOWN into the top of the 2nd and acquire more draft picks and use those other draft picks to slingshot up for more picks in the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th round because there's supposed to be a significant drop off in talent after the middle rounds.

    • Like (+1) 2
  4. 16 minutes ago, Mat68 said:

    Wait… We are saying Gauntlet speed is a better indicator than the 40?  This is just talking yourself into something.  In game GPS speed you got my attention.  Position drills at the combine I’am out on.   

     

    The gauntlet is much more representative of "in game GPS speed," don't you think?  Coleman and McConkey were 2 of the best performers in that drill.

     

    Let's also remember that Puka Nakua's 40 time last year was 4.57 and Kyren Williams' 40 time 2 years ago was a 4.65.

     

    Both of those guys were studs for the Rams.

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Thank you (+1) 1
  5. 10 hours ago, Pete said:

    Coleman can’t separate and only won 33% of contested catches.  I’m not sure why any team would consider him in the first round.  I don’t want him in the second either.  Too many other great WR and more team needs 

     

    • Like (+1) 2
  6. This is an awesome move! He was a backup and we were overpaying for him. Now we clear up over $3m in CAP space for a guy who played possibly a handful of snaps last season and no meaningful ones. As Sal Capacio said, Alec Anderson fills a similar role, has a full year in the system and is millions cheaper.

     

    I definitely think this ups the potential for a Center in the first few rounds, but with 11 picks now I think it would be negligence if we didn't draft a center.

     

    This draft is going to be super interesting. I've heard from some of the experts that this is a very top heavy draft in the sense that after rounds 3 or 4 the talent drops off a cliff. I expect Buffalo to make 5-7 picks in the first 4 rounds. I hope they all hit!

     

    Gonna be a fun draft!

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Haha (+1) 1
  7. 3 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

    Ladd said no but they spoke at the senior bowl. 


    Oh... well if they met at the Senior Bowl then obviously the Bills interviewed him... so the entire notion of him being off the table for us is out the window.

    • Like (+1) 1
  8. I'm confused.  Has it been confirmed that the Bills did NOT meet with McConkey?  Can't remember which podcast I was listening to, but I think it was Daniel Jeremiah who said that every NFL team has 75 interviews at the Combine, but only about 1/3rd of them are released publicly.

     

    So again, has it been confirmed we have NOT met with McConkey???

  9. If we stay at 28, I will be extremely happy with Thomas Jr or Mitchell. I'll be happy with Worthy, Franklin, Legette, McConkey or even Coleman (yes, despite the 40 time... he was great in drills).

     

    That's a lot of players. And frankly, I'm not going to be remotely surprised if we don't draft at 28, trade back, and slingshot to get any one of those 7 players along with an impact defensive player. Or we very likely could also just draft defense in round 1 and see if any of those players fall in round 2, which they might.

     

    And then you double dip with Roman Wilson, Malachi Coreley, Brendan Rice, Javon Baker, Ricky Pearsal, etc. in the middle rounds.

     

    This draft is deeeeeep... get 2

    • Like (+1) 1
  10. 2 things:

     

    1) There is NO WAY we are trading up into the top 10 this year!!! This team is too CAP strapped and needs to get AT LEAST 4 or 5 major contributors long term out of this draft.

     

    2) There is NO WAY we are using ALL 10 of our draft picks!!! Beane will 100% be making deals on our draft days. That said, anything more than a move into the late teens is too expensive. Right now I think we only trade up for 2 players: Brian Thomas Jr or Adonai Mitchell. No way Nabers or Odunze fall to the late teens. Otherwise stay in place and get Worthy/Legette/McConkey/Coleman or whoever McBeane decides on.

    • Like (+1) 3
    • Agree 3
  11. 16 minutes ago, Richard Noggin said:

     

    Pulled this shot of WR prospect rankings from the Cosell segment that...differs in some ways from popular fan sentiment:

     

    image.png.adb63ed79f3993510dc70bcf28f9c1e0.png

     

    Worthy and Baker ahead of Mitchell and Franklin? That's interesting, for sure.

     

    That also differs wildly from what Cosell himself was saying regarding Mitchell 

    • Agree 1
  12. 3 minutes ago, BillsFanForever19 said:

     

    Again, Corley looks great. He's a helluva Slot.

     

    But he's a true Slot.

     

    We have Slot's. But we need an Outside WR. Drafting Corley only removes Shakir or Kincaid from the field and leaves the hole vacated from Gabe Davis remaining on the Outside.

     

    As high as Steve Smith was on him, even he said you can't expect to take him from his practically exclusive Slot usage in a small college and stick him Outside in the NFL.

     

    Thomas Jr., Franklin, and Coleman are fits for us. Corley is not.

     

    Is he really a true slot, though???

     

    That WR looks like a dude!!!

     

    Looks like Deebo in the way he plays. He trucks CBs consistently.

     

    Google lists him at 5'11, 210 lbs with a 4.43 40 yard dash. We'll discover this all more in depth on Saturday, but if that's accurate, why is that a true slot? 

     

    And frankly, if we drafted him, a lot of people thought Shakir could eventually replace Diggs. I think the modern NFL is moving beyond the traditional X, Z, and Y receiver, don't you? We have a new OC... maybe he really prefers 2 "slot" guys. Maybe even 3????

  13. So I don't watch College Football... like at ALL!!!

     

    That said, I just watched YouTube highlights :lol: of Brian Thomas Jr., Keon Coleman, Troy Franklin and Malachi Corely. 

     

    They're highlights and I understand what that means.

     

    That said, in watching those highlights, the players I most want to see in Buffalo because I believe they are the modern NFL are, in this order:

     

    1) Keon Coleman 

    T-2 Malachi Corley 

    T-2 Troy Franklin 

    4) Brian Thomas Jr.

     

    Coleman, to me, is a step above Franklin and Corley just from watching the highlights. In reading scouting reports of him, I thought he'd be a big slug who couldn't separate. Doesn't look that way to me. Dude is elusive and even returned punts in college.

     

    I honestly only watched Corley because of the recent buzz and the fact that in Kiper's latest "First Draft" podcast, he said Corley was the guy he really wanted to put in the 1st round. I see why. Dude's a BEAST!!! My only issue with drafting him is I wonder if it maximizes his skillset playing with Josh ...

     

    Which is actually why Corley and Franklin tied to me. I think Franklin is PERFECT in terms of this offense and what it needs outside of Diggs and Shakir.

     

    I am impressed with Brian Thomas Jr's speed and downfield tracking... but that was like all I saw from him. I also understand that playing with Nabers he always got the opponent's #2 corner. So is he just a one trick pony up against inferior competition or is he really that good with the full route tree in his back pocket... just never needed it????

    • Like (+1) 1
  14. I posted this in another thread, but with the amount of void years the Bills are adding to contracts and our salary cap constraints this year and moving forward, can one of our resident CAP experts please explain Void years???

     

    We just restructured Conner McGovern's contract and added 2 void years at the end of his contract.  This means that even though his contract expires at the end of 2025, there will still be dead cap money for 2 more years.

     

    So does this basically just provide extra motivation to extend him for 2 more seasons beyond 2025?  And if we do that, does that basically just mean the void years we just put in his contract don't end up impacting the team at all?

     

    Then as a follow up question, when we signed Leonard Floyd last offseason, it was reported that there was a void year (I think just one) that we added into the deal.  According to Spotrac, Floyd has a dead cap hit THIS YEAR of $4,376,250.

     

    Now... IF that is correct regarding the Floyd deal AND my thoughts about extending a player who has void years would be beneficial in terms of the CAP, wouldn't it be wise to just sign him to another deal for next year since you're already paying him over $4m???  Even if Floyd goes out in the market and gets an offer of $10m on a one year deal from a team, the Bills could technically offer him the exact same deal and pay less than $6m in new money, correct???

     

    Anyone with an understanding of the void years thing???  An explanation would be much appreciated :thumbsup:

  15. Thought about making a thread asking this question, but I think it fits here:

     

    How about Void years?  We just restructured Conner McGovern's contract and added 2 void years at the end of his contract.  This means that even though his contract expires at the end of 2025, there will still be dead cap money for 2 more years.

     

    So does this basically just provide extra motivation to extend him for 2 more seasons beyond 2025?  And if we do that, does that basically just mean the void years we just put in his contract don't end up impacting the team at all?

     

    Then as a follow up question, when we signed Leonard Floyd last offseason, it was reported that there was a void year (I think just one) that we added into the deal.  According to Spotrac, Floyd has a dead cap hit THIS YEAR of $4,376,250.

     

    Now... IF that is correct regarding the Floyd deal AND my thoughts about extending a player who has void years would be beneficial in terms of the CAP, wouldn't it be wise to just sign him to another deal for next year since you're already paying him over $4m???  Even if Floyd goes out in the market and gets an offer of $10m on a one year deal from a team, the Bills could technically offer him the exact same deal and pay less than $6m in new money, correct???

     

    Anyone with an understanding of the void years thing???  An explanation would be much appreciated  :thumbsup:

  16. 2 hours ago, HappyDays said:

     

    Correct. But this news helps cap strapped teams more so it's still very good news for us. Of course it might mean free agency contracts are slightly higher than expected but still overall very good news.

     

    I don't think the Bills were ever really going to be big players in FA.  But this is awesome because it probably means that now the Bills don't have to restructure Diggs's deal like they would have before.  That doesn't really mean anything even for next offseason in terms of cutting or trading Diggs, but I think it gives us an easy out on his contract in the 2026 offseason.

×
×
  • Create New...