-
Posts
10,891 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by transplantbillsfan
-
What is your favorite positive Peterman play?
transplantbillsfan replied to Bing Bong's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Hang on. Are we limited to regular season games? I mean, he was an all star in meaningless preseason games. That's probably why so many people got suckered into thinking starting him was a good idea. If you're talking regular season meaningful games, he'd be the worst NFL starting QB I've seen in 30 years watching the NFL. -
TNF: Jets @ Browns (TT vs Darnold)
transplantbillsfan replied to EmotionallyUnstable's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
What a game between the 2 guys I wanted most... with Mayfield ahead of Darnold for me--not that we ever had a chance to draft either guy. Taylor was particularly bad tonight--reminded me of the New Orleans game. Deserved to be replaced... though I wonder if he took himself out based on that crowd, which was inevitable sooner or later given the #1 draft pick sitting behind him. Man, Mayfield is impressive. Darnold clearly has a ton of work to do. I just hope Allen can start producing and making those quick decisions like we saw tonight from Baker. 3... probably 4 top 10 draft choices now linked together for (hopefully) the next decade PLUS. Let's just hope we have the right Josh since Mayfield and Darnold were never options. -
Not hard to come by? Really? Then why have the Bills, Jets, Dolphins, Titans, Texans, Rams, 49ers, Bucs, Bears, Vikings, Browns, Broncos, and Raiders all been teams within the last 5 years or so suffering through a cycle of annual QB change with various "journeymen" or "tentative placeholders" or "young unproven rookies" in place? Taylor was a starting QB for an NFL team 3 years in a row, now going into his 4th. That's not easy to find. So sure, SF "fell into one." But look at the vicious QB cycle that came before that for the better part of 2 decades. Viable NFL Starting QBs don't grow on trees.
-
Wasn't even really a question of Josh Allen or Tyrod. It was Nathan Peterman or Tyrod. It's relatively clear now that Beane and McDermott's "plan" was to have Allen sit on the bench and learn for a while. The problem is they fell victim to foolishly believing that Tyrod's "veteran presence" could be so easily replaced that they waited for the scraps of the QBs in vet FA to get AJ McCarron. And then McCarron couldn't beat out or even really play up to the level of a rookie and a 2nd year pick-machine. This very much is the same type of situation we had with Fitz. We didn't have to get rid of Fitz just like we didn't have to get rid of Taylor. But for both situations, the regimes of that time falsely viewed both Fitz and Taylor as easily replaceable. NFL starting QBs just are NOT easy to come by. And like Taylor or not, he's an NFL starting QB. Just like Fitz was and is. Hindsight is 20/20, but it's pretty evident at this point that McDermott and Beane are regretting trading Taylor when they still would have had enough ammunition to trade up to get Allen at #7 in the draft. Now, personally I'm very happy with Allen as our starter over the idea of keeping Taylor and letting Allen ride the pine, but I also think that rookie QBs have no reason NOT to be on the field starting right away if you're willing to draft them in the top 10. The rules of the NFL are now so QB friendly that I think the David Carr effect is incredibly unlikely for QBs with that genuinely Elite potential worthy of spending a top 10 draft choice. I agree with you. I'd rather see Allen on the field now with the Bills than Taylor. But that doesn't change the fact now it's clear that this was never remotely the plan and if McDermott and Beane could rewind time knowing the outcome of all events up to now and NOT trade Taylor while still drafting a QB high in the 1st, that's what they would have done.
-
What I'm saying is that if their plan was to draft a QB in that draft, whoever their QB may have been, the choice to draft a QB or keep Fitz weren't mutually exclusive. We could have done both. There was no reason to let Fitz go. Manuel probably never would have had it in him to be a viable NFL starting QB. He's just too emotionally and mentally frail. I agree with you there. I think Trent Edwards had a better chance to be a Franchise QB than Manuel if he didn't get knocked the !@#$ out by Adrian Wilson in Arizona. But those chances would have at least increased if he sat behind a smart, tough vet like Fitz and, at worst, we could have just kept playing Fitz.
-
McDermott- Highest odds to be fired..
transplantbillsfan replied to McBean's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Whoever said that is an idiot. -
Absolutely agree on the Fitz thing. We could and should have kept Fitz at his reasonable contract and we STILL could have drafted Manuel in the 1st. And at that point at least Manuel wouldn't have been forced to play... unless that damn mat would have just hunted Fitz down somehow the way it did Kolb. Speaking of which, that choice of Kolb was a really underwhelming vet to bring in, anyway... kinda like AJ McCarron this year
-
So instead you thought a snarky title and a post about a player not on the team anymore filled with prose that is the literary equivalent of diarrhea would be better? If you didn't want to talk Bills football anymore, we have not just one, but two recent Bills QBs playing in the NFL. You could have gone the route of talking about the great career start Fitz has been having and how that PC he put on was hilarious and how Fitz is still Fitz. But no, instead you decide to be a downer and start a thread about someone not on the team for no reason at all but to gloat about something that's really not even warranted considering the 0-16 team the Browns were last year and the 2 teams the Browns have played probably better than for the first 2 weeks this year, save the worst NFL kicker in the history of the game. Soooo… that's the kinda guy you are... You must just be a hoot at parties.
-
Is there any team in worse shape than the Bills?
transplantbillsfan replied to Pete's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
We're fine. Go away. -
THE ROCKPILE REVIEW - Limited Excitement
transplantbillsfan replied to Shaw66's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
I was thinking the same thing about both of Allen's interceptions. I was actually just so friggin impressed he was even able to stay upright and get the ball out on the 1st interception that I didn't care he threw it to the other team. He'll learn to throw those away. Or in some cases he'll actually shrug off the defender and make those plays positive plays, instead. Same thoughts for the 2nd Interception. I'm glad Dabol dialed up a throw like that from the end zone. I really didn't like Dabol's playcalling as the game began. It was obvious he was trying to protect Allen. Only as the game got out of hand did Allen get to really throw it around and did the offense move. Why does that always seem to happen? I hope Dabol and Allen are in each other's ears all week and they're figuring out how to incorporate more RPOs or something to make the offense more explosive from the beginning of the game rather than waiting until we're down by multiple TDs before opening up. I'm still pretty excited about the rest of the season, actually. Now that Allen is starting and hopefully McDermott retains defensive playcalling duties, I still think we can make some serious noise. -
Won't go so far as you, but I think this team is starting to figure stuff out and I think we'll be at least highly competitive Sunday. I hope the combination of McDermott calling the plays along with maybe Allen and Dabol coming up with some stuff that Allen is more comfortable in running (more RPOs?) can propel us to a W. Yes, definitely a chance at maybe a W What the hell! I'm in... what could go wrong???