transplantbillsfan

A few days ago? This is something that's been known about Biden for years. The reason it clearly has to be brought to light is because of the complete glossing over that's happening right now of the fact that much of these viral moments you and others are posting and laughing at are portrayals of the very real symptoms of someone who stutters. If you think it's a "conspiracy of timing," then you and your ilk are the disease that caused it trolling the Internet. It's reasonable to have a very real discussion about age being a problem for our next President because our next President is going to be friggin old no matter what. But the way you gleefully post videos of Biden gaffes without actually considering that they are emblematic of a lifelong stuttering problem the guy has is just pathetic.

Why do the 2 have to be separated? You left out the option of "he appears to forget which office he's running for because of his stuttering problem." "Appears" is the operative word here. It's pretty easy to just assume Biden has dementia as you cherry-pick the gaffes he's actually been known for throughout his entire career, but because of his old age, they look that much worse. He's old. I'm not trying to paint him as some young buck. Trump's old. We will inevitably have some really old dude as President from 2020-2024. But are you truly going to completely disregard any connection between the symptoms of someone who stutters or the cicumlocution inherent in Biden's dialogue and the way he mixes his words up? You've made your minds up and will point and laugh no matter what. But maybe seeing these brief video bubbles that are Trolling viral moments on Youtube or Twitter are exactly the reason many of you should stop spending so much time on Youtube and Twitter.

Honest question: Did you read the article before you asked me this question?

Something you guys should at least read and consider before going back to what you've been doing:

Out of that ENTIRE post, you pull that one line? How ironic considering I'm the one who just argued fact and you're the one who argued emotion with that propoganda

Whatever bro. I get mad at myself every time I take you for being thoughtful and waste my time clicking on your links going down rabbit holes watching propoganda crap like what you just posted as some kind of proof of your argument. Just proves how flimsy your argument is. I just hope you'll come back from the Dark Side in November when Trump is ousted.

Use common sense. But fine. I understand why you folks want so desperately to remain in denial.

Jesus man. I post facts and you post an idiotic piece of propoganda. Typical you. Do you honestly waste your time watching a lot of this junk on Youtube and Twitter? I guess that was a rhetorical question since you post so much of the crap all the time. Soooo... what was incorrect about the facts I posted?

He won because everyone thought the Democratic nominee would be the inevitable winner, so they stayed home because they thought their vote would mean less. First and foremost, black voter turnout dropped for the first time in 2 decades and it dropped by 7%, which is a precipitous drop and significant loss specifically for the Democratic Party, which relies largely on the Black vote, which votes like 90% Democrat in every Presidential election cycle. Seriously, think about how inevitable Clinton was to most of the country? Trump won because of 77,744 votes in Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/weekly-standard/the-election-came-down-to-77-744-votes-in-pennsylvania-wisconsin-and-michigan-updated In Pennsylvania, overall turnout was up from 2012 (from 5.6 million to 6 million), but the racial composition of the electorate was significantly different. Clinton won 92 percent of African-Americans and Obama won 93 percent of African-Americans. But in 2012, black voters made up 13 percent of the electorate; in 2016, they comprised just 10 percent of the electorate. In terms of raw votes, that means roughly 130,000 fewer African-Americans voted in Pennsylvania in 2016 than voted in 2012. If those voters had shown up on Tuesday, that alone would've been enough for Clinton to hold Pennsylvania by a razor-thin margin. Does it seem so far in the Democratic primary cycle that black voters are staying home? Throw in the fact that more voters threw away their vote by voting for someone other than the top 2 candidates in the history of the US. Just think about that for a minute: 7.8 million people in our Country threw their vote in the garbage by voting for 3rd party candidates. I've spoken with some people who did that, specificially because they refused to vote for Clinton despite the fact that they despised Trump. It's nothing more than anecdotal, but these same people (there are 3 of them I've spoken in depth about this with) told me that in the next election they'd vote for whoever runs against Trump. I know you guys are in your bubble over here. We're all in our own little bubbles. But boy do I have a feeling that this board will implode when Trump loses in November. Don't worry about me if Trump wins. I'll be fine, plus I'll be sporting a new avatar for awhile.

I will vote Biden over Trump I will vote Sanders over Trump I will vote Gabbard over Trump Whoever the Democratic nominee over Trump. Period. And there are a loooOOOOOOOttt of people in this Country who feel the same.

Okay then, be a baby. Don't admit you've been wrong for nearly a year now. I'm very sorry. I'm sure you're not as desperately in need of repair in person as you are on the Internet

Unfortunately you still don't get it. This election is about Trump, not about whoever the Democratic nominee will be. I know you guys over here are in denial about this right now, but we'll circle back to it after the election in November and you can thank me for trying to keep you informed months in advance

Links? It's deep and buried in these threads. If there were a very quick way for me to search for individual posts made by you in July, I would. Scrolling through a 373 page thread to search for posts by you that you'll clearly just twist the meaning of afterwards rather than admit you were wrong is just not worth it. Do you have a quick way to search for posts 6 or 7 months old? If you do, I'll post some links, assuming you don't go back and try to alter them--although I did quote most of them anyway so they exist for posterity's sake, even if they're a pain in the arse to pull up.

No, I'm asking you to man up and concede something you've said for nearly a full year. Methinks thou dost protest too much

I asked you to concede you're overt nearly year-long-blunder first. Do that and I'll answer your question, though I'll have to be reminded of your question because I was waiting for your concession before even really reading just about any other post of yours.

Oy I'm sorry my friend, but I really hope in your personal life you're more capable of admitting when you're wrong. Happy Primary Day, though. Think Joe loses the delegate count today?

Probably because you won't admit how utterly dead wrong you were. Not about the General (yet), but about the Primary. Just admit you were dead wrong when you said many times Joe didn't have a shot to win the Democratic nomination. I know it takes some humility in order to do that, but it'll make you feel good as you take baby steps forward as a human being

Good example of how 2 people can view a scene in 2 different ways. This is the interaction when Biden was confronted by that guy saying "you are actively trying to infringe our Second Amendment right and take away our guns." Biden was pretty angry at what he clearly and genuinely feels is a lie--and whether or not you believe he's really doing it, he believes he isn't. At which point Biden says he's "full of *****" to his face and stands there continuing to talk to him. The guy says something about having a video of it to which Biden responds how it's probably just another deep fake. Frankly, Biden deserves more respect than you're giving him for standing there and continuing to address some moron who's clearly just looking to be part of a viral moment. It's more than our Paper Tiger President would ever do. He'd probably find a way to walk away as quickly from the situation as possible and then call the guy names on Twitter. What???? You're almost as unintelligible as @OldTimeAFLGuy

@Deranged Rhino" He's got no chance. None. Tuesday will be fun to watch you come back with a new story about how you never were that high on Ol' Joe. " Literally all about the Primary. It'd be a little sad and pathetic how stubborn you're being about this if it weren't so damn funny.

@Deranged Rhino: "First you were certain Biden would be the one to end Trump — then he cratered like I promised he would." Channeling my inner Yoda: Crater did he?

Hmmmm... talking about the General, eh? @Deranged Rhino: "From the beginning you said it was a sure thing that Joe would win the nomination and beat Trump. You hit that hard, repeatedly (not that you wanted Joe, but that's how it would go) -- I told you that Joe had no chance. And he doesn't. "

Wow. Look. You're still denying. Just incredible. There's no running from being wrong in November for you when Trump Loses.

No victory lap. @Deranged Rhino was just very, very wrong about something he was absolutely certain of and rather than admit how consistently he claimed he was absolutely certain about something that has already been proven false, he denies he ever adamantly argued such a thing. So no victory lap. Just some good old fashioned ribbing.