BullBuchanan

You ignored all my questions. How about you replace "muslim" which we've been so conditioned to feel apathy towards when it comes to racism, with any other minority. If he made a comment that said: "Black people murdered 2000 people last year. A black man is now on pace to be mayor of NYC" You wouldn't think that comment was intended to sow fear in white people? I already asked this, but if not, then what is the point of the statement? Did he have a stroke and just spouting off fun-facts or are they intended to be related somehow? If you had ever studied religion, you'd know they are in fact all the same. All myths throughout history have used the same template. Most people accept Mormons as christians these days, despite it being a religion that's less than 200 years old. It was a modern day cult that reached mainstream status. It's hard to take people seriously that believe there's a sky daddy that cares about the minutiae of their day to day lives.

If she's not allowed to have other options other than cooking, cleaning, and being a mother - by definition that makes her a second class citizen because she doesn't have the freedom that men to define their lives however they want.

How did I bastardize it? aren't all muslims of Islamic faith? The burden of proof of a statement is on the person making it. I believe the statement to be illogical at its core, so it's impossible to prove. I couldn't say that "islam is compatible with western civilization" anymore than I could say christianity or judaism is. Personally, I think that belief in any religion should be considered a form of mental illness, but it's such a pervasive problem that it seems totally illogical to me to say that one is "compatible" with "western civilization" and one is not - especially considering that islam, judaism, and christianty all believe in different flavors of the same abrahamic "god", and the founders of "western civilization" were polytheistic pagans whose religion had more in common with eastern religions like hinduism than any modern monotheistic religion Are there a lot of beheadings going on in Dearborn? Does saying that a women's primary purpose is cooking, cleaning and pooping out kids make her a first class or second class citizen? I'm pretty sure there was a whole societal movement about this that we studied in school.

Absolutely. I've worked closely with hundreds of muslims over my career and have several close muslim friends, one of which is a very close friend. Oh, so muslims tend to move to places and not fully assimilate, unlike say christians? What does assimilation look like to you? Do you think the statements about women from christians like Kirk and Harrison Butker are compatible with "modern feminist views of western culture"? If it's not a statement rooted in hatred - what is the point of telling people that "Zohran Mamdani" is muslim? What's the purpose of telling people he is "socialist"? What's the purpose of his thesis statement mentioning that muslims were involved in 9/11? Are these things just non sequiter fun facts or do they have some meaning that he's trying to convey?

Oh, how did I misquote? What is the difference to you?

Do you have any muslim friends? have you ever had a personal or extended professional relationship with someone who is muslim? What does it mean to say that muslims are not compatible with the United States? What is the value added to the conversation by saying that there were people involved in 9/11 that were muslim? What is the value added to the conversation by saying that the person "on pace to run New York City" is a "Muslim Socialist" instead of saying "Zohran Mamdani is on pace to run New York City"

Charlie Kirk's own facebook and twitter account? Doesn't get any closer to the dead horse's mouth than that.

If you don't consider me THE worst, it means I still have a lot of work to do.

Nope, I don't "believe" anything. I KNOW the awful and horrific things he said that stoked hatred and fear int his country in an attempt to divide and alienate massive portions of it. You would do if you just bothered to check his social media accounts and interviews.

No, you absolutely won't. You don't believe in things based on facts, you believe in things based on ideological allegiances. If you need me to point out an example for you of a time when this guy said horrendous things, then you aren't arguing in good faith, because the examples are plentiful and anyone who has even heard of the guy has heard/read them.

I'm having a great day. I hope you lot have the day you deserve

*you're

Literally no one cares about this dude.

Did he have his membership card on him? Everyone who isn't a fascist is "antifa" by default. All of the greatest generation who fought for the allies were "antifa". And it could all be a rouse, a patsy working for the Trump Admin, which wouldn't surprise me in the slightest.

Right, so, not at all then. Got it. I don't care about your feelings.

Let me know when it's been debunked.

The Albright-Knox Art Gallery is fantastic - actually the best I've been to outside of DC. It's a beautiful building too. Kuni's has some of the best sushi I've had anywhere. If the Bisons are playing, it's always a fun time to go to the ball park and tickets are cheap. Tour the marina if the ships are open again - they've been under repair for a few years. Go to Ted's for a Sahlen's Hot Dog - The best in the country as far as I've had.

I won't shed any tears for Democrats either. They're just conservatives that don't believe you should say the N word in public. What now? let them "be furious". Stew in that ***** forever. Clowns like him are the reason they exist in the first place. He made his career stoking hate and fear.

Was it this one? https://www.instagram.com/reel/DOcCmPoDXLJ/

I won't remember him at all, just as he wished.

It's amazing how soft the "fReE sPeEcH" and the "cOmEdY iS lEgAl aGaIn" crowd get when their feeling get hurt. **** your feelings.

Sounds like projection of this whole goddamn thread. 😂 And "beliefs that were mainstream" in 1848 looked a hell of a lot different than in 1861. You guys FAFO'd then and you're FAFO'ing now. I guess We shouldn't expect any better when you openly admit to believing in a regressive ideology. Adapt or 💀

I dunno man, we know with certainty that Trump has already had foreign adversaries assassinated in public with civilian collateral damage(Iranian General Qasem Soleimani). Once you pop your cherry, I'm sure it gets a lot easier to keep doing it. When there's personal benefit to be had? Well, then it's a no-brainer. The Epstein scandal may indeed stick around, but it depends how trump plays it. If they get some patsy to go along, or even bettr - they just off somebody, like they did with the Ear Job - then the whole matter just goes away. There doesn't even need to be a real person behind it. You just configure a fake FB/Twitter profile and Chat GPT some fake personal photos and you're done. I've already been seeing AI generated photos of "a person of interest" going around conservative social media today. It would be VERY easy to do, and in the meantime he could do things like declare martial law, or just move the national guard/military into american cities of rivals, like Chicago.

It doesn't have to be the end of days for trump and his staff to do reckless things. They've shown in the past that they'll waste no opportunity create spectacles for their gain. What if he really is implicated directly in the Epstein Files? What if there's direct concrete evidence that he was/is involved in sex trafficking and that's why they haven't been released?

It's obvious because it provides MASSIVE political benefit. Think about it. Trump's approval ratings are in the gutter right now. The economy is toast, he's getting major pressure about Epstein, the immigration raids are starting to blow up in his face - what better way out of it than a major distraction that also galvanizes his base. GWB lied about Iraq having WMDs and started a war that killed 500K civilians just to get out from his scandals, what's one Charlie Kirk? Most people left of republicans don't even know who he is. If you were someone that wanted him dead because you disagreed with him, there are hundreds of more more prominent and damaging people out there. Why would someone be willing to potentially sacrifice themselves over a guy like that? He's a minor league player, but his death would be a rallying cry for all the podcasters and disaffected white boys. It will give Trump all the credibility he needs to do some really heinous ***** if he wants to, and no one from his party will dare try to stop him. Politically, it's a very fortunate event, I would say too fortunate.