BullBuchanan

Not really, no. See my previous comment. Going after her lawyer just seems like an ad hominem to me. Jane Doe could fire him tomorrow and we don't have any reason to believe that anything about the story would change. To me, that's the only thing that matters. There's been an attempt to discredit her legal representation since the very early pages on this thread based on things as unrelated as who he talks to on Twitter. That's very troublesome to me.

Attempting to discredit the plaintiffs attorney only serves to discredit the plaintiff which is highly inappropriate. So the attorney can't issue subpoenas. Cool. We know that and can move on froma pretty innocuous detail. With respect to lying about a settlement offer? I think that's all caught in the bickering between the two lawyers, and if it isn't again I'm not really concerned. I care about the actual story, not the way the lawyer does his job.

Ok, cool. That all seems like fluff to me well outside of the main story.

I didn't levy the accusations. I responded to them. Pay attention.

This is nonsense. The baseless attacks attempting to discredit the broad journalist community over the last several years based on ominous "agendas" is a tired take. What "agenda" is in play here? Should the news be burying the story like the university did?

What does "the media" have to do with it? There hasn't been anything said in reports fromt he media that I've seen that wasn't presented directly by the victim's lawyer. To me, the biggest part is that the university buried/covered up this story., and my question is did the police help them? if it is determined there was a coverup here, I would sure if I were the Bills

It's almost like maybe police don't always do the right thing. I dunno.

Same. I was a very big fan of Rudolph, and I still think he cans tick around this league for a while and carve out a career. He didn't play bad in a rookie season he wasn't expected to play in. Since then,he really hasn't had much opportunity.

You're my best friend.

Coming from you? A compliment of the highest order my friend.

Haack was due to make 1.8M in salary. I'm guessing they didn't want to pay him that.

I mean this with all due respect, but who you know and what you know about them appears to be very narrow compared to the cornucopia of people and their activities. You could find thousands of consensual examples of the exact thing you don't think exists with 20 chararters or less and any search engine of your choosing. Except Ask Jeeves - I'm not sure he can find that for you.

I actually said that gang rape is worse than murder. I didn't say anything about sexual assault.

Hodgins is doing a very nice job, but I don't really care much if they keep or cut him because he shouldn't ever play meaningful snaps for the Buffalo Bills. Best case scenario, he's our #6 WR and 9th receiving option (behind Knox, Singletary and Cook). It should take at least three significant injuries to our WR group for him to see meaningful snaps there, and maybe even 4 if they decide to make Cook more of a WR in that event. Even if he does all the right things, next year he would be no higher than 4th. It's not worth losing sleep over.

I'm not trolling, but don't recontextualize my statement. There's no need for less accurate descriptions.

Which is a crime.

I want him gone based on the negative publicity and distraction he's brought to the franchise in a year where we are trying to win our first championship. I wanted Cole Beasley gone last year for the same reason. I'll withhold my judgement on whether or not I think he's guilty of rape until more evidence comes to light.

literally yes. is this the first you're hearing of this? https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2018/10/06/less-than-percent-rapes-lead-felony-convictions-least-percent-victims-face-emotional-physical-consequences/ https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2019/08/an-epidemic-of-disbelief/592807/

You have access to the lawsuit. I'm not going to read to you like you're a toddler.

It's telling of nothing except the breadth of our ignorance as a country as to how mishandled sex crimes are int his country. 11 months is nothing for this sort of case - many go years or are never resolved.

Not a legal expert, but I'm guessing alleging that you have a police-recorded tape of a public person admitting to a felony and it's a lie, then you would be liable to significant legal retaliation. I'm going to air on the side that they probably didn't make it up out of thin air. The fact that Araiza's camp hasn't denied it behind "this isn't what it seems" doesn't exactly inspire confidence. Still my position has always and will always be that I don't care if he's innocent or guilty with respect to his future on the Buffalo Bills, because I don't think he should have one unless he can prove he wasn't even there.

Am I really comparing gang rape to murder? Yes, yes I am. I think it's worse, and I'll die on that hill.

I never once said he's guilty of anything beyond what he admitted to, which is sex with a minor.

I don't know what you are or are not, but I didn't call you anything. I was speaking in response to your opinion. It took Aaron Hernandez nearly two years from arrest to verdict. The patriots cut him the day charges were filed. I would expect no less here.

disgusting. absolutely disgusting.