Buffalo_Gal

What's this!? Money laundering? Graft? You don't say...

Yes, it is very telling why you do not feel the Democrats 2016 election interference with the Ukraine should not be investigated. Go look at the 2020 Democrats running thread. I called it the day Joey-B announced his plan to run it was so he could scream "political persecution". It wasn't hard to figure out if you have been following the source documents (and Joey-B's stupid interview where he admits to shaking down the Ukraine). There is a reason for this charade, and it is because the bad-orange-man is exposing, and taking away, their graft. It crosses both sides of the aisle (stinkin' John McCain was hip deep in it), and they are most unhappy that the money-spigot has been turned off. They will be even unhappier with arrests.

Oh, of course he is. I know it is a pretty tight circle on this, but shesh you'd think there were only three attorneys in all of DC the way the same people keep popping up again, and again for the deep staters.

I cannot believe the Democrats have not called it a day on this. The released polls (I know, I know) show independents up 10% in the Are you ***** kidding me? category in just three days. It isn't going to get better. Is Nancy letting this run so it never comes up again? Schiffy over-promised and under-delivered (again). Is this to shut up up? And they must know if it moved to the Senate things only get worse for them. Are the votes not there to bring impeachment proceedings?

I never wrote what you have in quotes from me. Did you mean to misrepresent what I wrote? Or what it an accident? (the second part)

The Ukrainians were asked to look into the 2016 election interference the previous administration participated in - you know, the same election the Democrats examined Trump's undies over. Why was that ok to investigate the Trump campaign, yet it is not ok to investigate 2016 election interference by the Ukraine and the Democrats? And as a bonus question - why is ok for Joe Biden to secure graft through his son Hunter? Consider if that were Trump/Trump Jr. Would you think that was wrong?

Almost showtime. Sondland up. No idea what he will do or say as he changed his testimony already. ?‍♀️

Yeah, I've been watching... well most of it. It is a buncha butt-hurt state officials whining and complaining that the foreign policy changed. *GASP!!!* And, what was worse, they never met the President, have no first hand knowledge of the phone call (except for the leaker Vindman and that lady Williams), apparently cannot read a transcript (which was testified to as accurate by Vindman and Williams), and are basically there to cry that they were not consulted on foreign policy change. Then to top it all off? The foreign policy change is working. The horror!! Only someone disconnected from reality could possibly think there is anything impeachable about this call. The quid-pro-quo talking point is long gone. Now they are on to "bribery". Only problem for the Democrats is the only one mentioned in those 3500 pages of released depositions mentioned in connection to the word Bribery is Biden. Oopsie.

No longer. We had a landline until last year. I had no idea what the number was as we only had it for the alarm. I never used the landline to make a call in all the years we had it. Hubby finally had us switch over to an alarm system that used our cell phones for notifications, and then we ditched the landline. (Our fax number is through the internet.)

Shocker. Not. it started long ago, not in 2018.

And this is the difference between boys and girls... boys think a perfectly natural bodily function is hilarious, and worthy of a lot of (not funny) "jokes." ?‍♀️

WTH are these two here? It is basically, Ukraine needs the cash, let's get it to them, the new guy is fighting corruption. They have said there are no pre-conditions.

Vindman is *****. I know they guarantee them "no reprisals" but leaking classified information prior to this "investigation" ... I wonder if that is why he testified? Hoping it will shield him?

There are a lot of butt-hurt people in the State Department. It is like they are pubescent girls instead of adults (supposedly) carrying out US foreign policy. And, they consider themselves out "betters." It beggars belief.

Oh yay, they are back. Is it too early to start drinking? ?

Vindman calls himself "never partisan" I definitely missed that earlier.

I think it is for more than that... just a hunch. There are some interesting names being brought up by the Republicans (and oddly, the Democrats) in this "inquiry". I know it ties to the OIG report to come, but it should be interesting if it gets laid out step-by-step in a Senate trial. That would make for some drama and must-see-TV.

LOL Ratcliff on Bribery... bribery was only mentioned in reference to Biden in that stack of papers.

LOL Again Jim Jordan asked him who else he leaked to... And now we have a "whistleblower" stoppage.

Jim Jordan asked him point blank if he "ever leaked any information", and he said "no".

Used anyone's computer at the NSC without their knowledge or authorization. "no" Lying or taking someone else down with him?

Trying to bring Rudy into " our tent". These people...

For the high drama? / sarc To bore us all to death? To waste cable news time?