Jump to content

Bray Wyatt

Community Member
  • Posts

    4,055
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Bray Wyatt

  1. Saquon Barkley will look good in the blue and white. Shame about the Hooker kid. Anyone who has watched more colts games than I know how he was doing? Certainly was an intriguing draft prospect.

     

    He was tied with Hyde for the league lead in interceptions so has to be doing pretty well I would think

  2. I really felt they could have done more with Bill Goldberg

     

    The guy came back and got in phenominal shape for his age.....was actually a inspiration to me to do it myself

     

    Not sure if you are being serious or not here, the rumors at the time were that Goldberg couldn't go very long hence the short length of the matches

  3. Cena with his mic skills could be amazing as a heel, esp if they insist on having Roman be a face. Have Cena flip then and work heel against him. Woman's wrestling is mostly meh to me, there have only been a few matches that I thought were good, but to be fair, management/creative just throws them all out there in a 6 person tag match and a title match sprinkled in here and there. They haven't really given them much to work with

  4. Vince needs to kickstart his product cause buildings are empty and ratings are going down fast.

     

    Maybe they don't feel the urgency cause there isn't a WCW kicking their ass like in 96.

     

    The obvious move to kickstart the product will never happen though.

     

    Get rid of the PG era?

  5. According to the rule, he's supposed to do this:

     

    ' When tackling a passer who is in a defenseless posture (e.g., during or just after throwing a pass), a defensive player must not unnecessarily or violently throw him down and land on top of him with all or most of the defender’s weight. Instead, the defensive player must strive to wrap up or cradle the passer with the defensive player’s arms.

    We can disagree about whether what Barr did qualifies as 'driving him down' (I think he did), but what about must not unnecessarily 'land on top of him with all or most of the defender's weight'?

     

    Is that even physically possible in this instance? Guy is running full speed at a QB who is known to run with the ball, goes in for the tackle to bring him down, and is somehow supposed to just let up without even knowing if he threw the ball?

     

    My point is I don't think he did anything that was unnecessary which would be why the rule you are stating doesn't apply

  6. Why can’t you? Cause you say? You think it’s so black and white. We barely understand how the brain works. Soldier goes to Iraq...now he’s screwed up cause he saw awful stuff. His mind is permanently changed due to his environment. But you don’t think a kid can be changed by the environment? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

     

    A soldier comes back with a messed up its called PTSD, a mental disorder. Some how, a man being trapped in a womans body and vice versa is not considered a disorder

  7. Can these refs see anything? This is not a clear fumble out of bounds. He clearly regained control and his left knee was down just before he hit he pylon and the ground(endzone) inside the pylon. This was a TD.

     

    The refs said he lost control again when he hit the ground therefore it was a fumble out of end zone. This is BS.

    I believe this was an improper judgement call on if he controlled the ball when he hit the ground to complete the play. (which by the way I have never heard of before except in cases of incomplete or complete passes)You can see him change the ball from his left hand to his right hand when he hits the ground. In my judgement that is not a fumble as the ball never came out and this is not a juggle. He clearly still controlled the ball throughout the process. Players change hands all the time and it is never considered out of his control or a fumble.

     

    NFL screwed this up big time. At the very least it is inconclusive so original TD call stands. All day except when you play the Cheats.

     

    Fact check for any fan and NFL........if this was ruled a TD there would be no one talking about any controversy at all. NO ONE.

    First bolded, did not see that in a picture (I did not see it live) so if that is the case then I agree

     

     

    Second bolded, I agree if that is what was said

    Also, on the Rodgers hit, I don't think he hit him unnecessarily. He was going for the tackle when Rodgers released, how is Barr supposed to stop trying to tackle him?

  8. The Jets call, I believe there was a still on ESPN that showed him clearly have the ball separated from him, and therefore I think he has to reestablish possession. I think he controls the ball again when crossing the pylon but lands out of bounds without getting his two feet back in bounds, so therefore he recovered it out of bounds. Now I am not 100% on the last part but I think that is what they are saying

     

    Edit: Here is a link to the picture I was talking about, its the still image before the video plays

     

    http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/21036046/new-york-jets-upset-baffled-apparent-touchdown-turned-fumble-replay-review

     

  9.  

    Hell, I'd find it more interesting if they stole the urn bit from the Undertaker.

     

    Maybe they'll have Abigail possess a woman to be his valet or something. I really am not interested in seeing 'Finn v. Bray 5: Dude Looks Like a Lady'.

     

    Honestly if this is what happens, ill have to change my name around these parts

×
×
  • Create New...