Roundybout

Yes, the plan is to start another war in the Middle East while ramming through a disaster budget that will overwhelmingly harm the lower class and sell off America’s public lands to private interests. We know.

If you don’t follow through on the regime change, you create Libya. Or Iran circa 1979.

Don’t fret. Trump hired a 22-year-old landscaper/grocery bagger for his anti-terrorist intel team. Only the best and brightest!

I hope this means he’s pulling the bill. He has to know what a universally hated idea it is.

Not sure what there is to misinterpret. It’s particularly clear how you will never admit Trump lied to you.

Hang on a second. I was told that we were just at war with Iran’s nuclear program, not Iran. Could it be that I was lied to AGAIN?

You’re confusing something that didn’t happen?

This never happened. That’s a photoshopped image. Come on.

Pacers really falling apart that quarter, it felt like they pushed way too much at the end.

Guy was playing with fire by going out there with that calf strain. You absolutely hate to see it

Sure man. Holding consistent principles must be a foreign concept to you

Like you lit the fuse, you think it's fictional? Mystical? Maybe, spiritual hero Who appears in you to clear your view when you're too crazy? Lifeless to those, the definition for what life is Priceless to you, because I put you on the hype ***** You like it? Gun smokin', righteous with one toke Get psychic among those, possess you with one dose

Great post. And think that’s why this proposal is hated by both the left and right.

Let’s keep it that way. I’m opposed to sprawl. It’s bad development and bad urbanism.

I agree with this and it's frustrating that Dem leadership sticks with this line instead of focusing on Trump's lie about no new wars.

Yes. Here is a study from Headwaters Economics, a research firm in Montana. https://headwaterseconomics.org/public-lands/wildfire-public-land-housing/ "Less than 2% of the 181 million acres of Forest Service operational and Department of Interior land included this analysis are close enough to towns with housing needs to be practical for development—around 2.4 million acres. Most of this land is concentrated in a handful of western states—primarily Nevada, Arizona, California, New Mexico, and Utah—and the vast majority of the land is managed by DOI. Forest Service lands offer even fewer options, with only three states (Arizona, Utah, and Oregon) having more than 5,000 acres near towns." Developing housing on public lands may offer benefits in a limited number of communities, but it is not a broad solution. While access to low-cost land can help, housing affordability depends on a complex set of factors—such as construction and labor costs, financing availability and interest rates, insurance access and affordability, and proximity to jobs. In addition, hyperlocal constraints like water supply and community opposition can further restrict feasibility. Beyond this, I don't want our pristine and beautiful natural lands to be taken over for suburban sprawl. It's unsustainable development. Housing policy should be focused on upzoning existing municipal lands and reusing underdeveloped sites, instead of paving over new ones.

Sure. I think he was a practice squad guy during the offseason. Anyone remember A.J. Tarpley?

When did I defend Iran? Please be specific.

The land the federal government owns in the west is pristine and also not developable. Leave it be.

So, it IS a war then? Good to know.

I love the little tough guy faces they’re trying to make. Vance looks like he just let out a wet fart and is trying to hold it in.

What is stopping Iran from a) simply purchasing a nuke or b) restarting the development at other sites?

Management? What?