WEATHER DOT COM

I think Coleman (X stater) and Davis (backup) both play a lot on offense - thus giving Allen a couple of new weapons to use. I could also see Van Pan starting by the middle of the season. That's potentially 3 offensive rookies from this draft contributing quite a bit. Not bad for picking at the end of each round. Coleman, IMO, was a swing for the fences pick. There were safer options there, but he had the highest ceiling of all remaining receivers.

The Bills did not net an additional pick.

Saw last night the KC trade was in the top 10 weakest returns for a similar move per the value chart

Don’t mind the trade backs but I feel like they were both weak returns. after two trade backs Beane still has the same number of picks he had before the draft started. If you’re trading back, at least reap extra picks.

Bills move up for Kool-Aid McKinstry.

Good - hope he rots in hell

Until at least one other NY based team sends a similar letter, the Sabres are using this "recent ticket reseller law" as a crutch for this new policy.

The Sabres blaming the state is hilarious. If that was the case I'd imagine at least the Bills, Bandits, Knicks, Yankees, Mets, etc etc etc would have similar rules... but none do - just the Sabres. Don't worry, though, Terry will build another well if he needs some extra money.

Turn this guy into Charles Clay

The final four was the opposite of competitive.

The countersuit cites the Mississippi code RE the interest on page 28. It's not illegal. Favre also agrees to pay back the $1.1 mil plus interest the day before his first payment of $500,000.

Here is the actual claim - https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24408674-shad-white-counterclaim-against-brett-favre - in relation to the principal and interest owed here - pages 28 and 29 calculate this December 27, 2017: $500,000 funneled to Favre June 2018: $600,000 funneled to Favre $1,100,000 total sans interest By May 5th, 2020, Favre owed $1,100,000 in principal and $437,000 in accrued statutory interest ($1,537,000 total) May 6, 202: Favre admits he is personally responsible and will pay back the state the full sum of plus interest he owes "in the coming months" May 7, 2020: Favre pays $500,000. This leaves a balance of $740,000 in unpaid principal which continues to bear interest plus $132,000 in already accrued interest October 25, 2021 (over a year later - lots of accruing interest): Favre pays $600,000 which reduced the principal owed by Favre to $437,000 with no further interest at that time February 5, 2023: Favre still owes $437,000. Since October 25th 2021, another $292,790 in statutory interest has accrued from the $437,000 he still owes. $437,000 + $292,790 = the money in the claim (which will continue to grow with interest) Explained in the linked filing

He took $1.1 million, and then paid back $1.1 million years later (in two separate sums). In essence, as the article points out, this is a $1.1 million loan sans interest. He should have to pay more, just as he would have if he took out a $1.1 million loan. My guess on the interest is that it is a percentage based on what one would pay if they took out a loan of $1.1 million and failed to pay until Favre paid back the first part of the full sum he owed. The rest of your post is a bit political for my taste in this forum. We all know the govt. and large corporations rob us more than the average person. That has zero to do with this specific case.

Is it your position that if one steals $X million and then makes $Y in interest off the stolen $X, the thief should be entitled to keep $Y after they rightfully pay back $X? I disagree quite a bit.

Idk but I'll never forget one of my first games. Eagles @ Bills - Bills are driving to win the game and it's 4th and 8 or so. Drew Bledsoe is pressured, scrambles out of the pocket, and throws the ball away OOB because he thought it was 3rd down. My father told me to get used to it.