Jump to content

BillsShredder83

Community Member
  • Posts

    5,549
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by BillsShredder83

  1. 1 hour ago, Jobot said:

    CRAZY that removing OJ has 1000% been assessed by the Bills and determined that removal of his name would receive PR backlash... The world we live in todaySMH

    Honestly I think its one of those things where they just don't want it back in the news cycle, which I disagree with.

     

    Just take it down in the off season. No press statement or announcement, just do it quietly and give a generic "it was an in house decision, which we will have no further comment on" and be done with it

    • Like (+1) 1
  2. 1 hour ago, dave mcbride said:

    And OJ didn’t say this about the team’s owner: ‘He also asked [Bruce] Allen to tell Bryan Glazer, whose family owns the Buccaneers, to perform oral sex on him. Allen reportedly responded that Glazer would “take you up on that offer.”’

    lol i want to wash my eyes out with soap after the way they reported that statement.  just say he said "he can blow me". good grief my imagination is too wild to read statements like that lol

  3. 6 hours ago, YoloinOhio said:


    Vote Here: https://www.nfl.com/voting/rookies/

    I feel like this will be Kadaruis Toney but wonder if his ejection for throwing a punch will matter in the voting 

     

    he reminds me of a young Percy harvin in more ways than one 

    I reallyyyyyy wished we'd had the luxury of drafting a dude like this last year, but obviously DE was #1 need and im thrilled with Groot.  I think weve built the team enough where if a prospect like him fell next year we could pull the trigger in the 1st.

     

    Dude was 4 for 5 with 70 yards on his targets vs Diggs!!!! Hard to not drool picturing him in our offense

  4. 35 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

     

    Rest assured, we do.  The Bills visitors' locker room has a well-deserved rep as one of the shabbiest in the league.

     

    Pretty flimsy roughing call take away a 4th down stop from KC as well IIRC

    Really? I hate that and hope we fix thst in the new stadium. I don't think it gives any advantage in game.

     

    Secondly, i don't want other players first impression of the stadium/facilities to be a crap one. Don't wanna make 'cruiting harder on yourself than it needs to be. Just my 2cents

  5. 5 minutes ago, Draconator said:

    Burrow taken to hospital for possible throat contusion 

    Jeeperz hope he's alright. I hate the Bengals. Literally trying to get their qb killed behind that line, but they have Chase. Sewell is taking his lumps but he'll be fine. Burrows getting Luck'd from the league if they don't smarten up

  6. 49 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

    My god Sam Darnold is so bad. I thought the Panthers made a mistake trading for him. He does not have the mental makeup needed to be a professional QB.

    Yeah he got exposed today. I didn't like the move when they made it, but seemed like low ish risk/high reward... looked like it might work out, but after today I just think he's bound to continue struggling. Slays a great corner, but those 2 picks were gift wrapped

    • Like (+1) 1
  7. 1 hour ago, YoloinOhio said:

    Speaking of high school teams, that Eagles offense that looked so explosive vs the chief is back to being brutal today

    Hurts has made a few of the dumbest decisions I've ever seen today. Car defense is nasty, but Hurts just blows. Back to the drawing board with that one

  8. 4 hours ago, Chandler#81 said:

    Ok guys, take the saltpeter pills issued to you.

     

    Yep. Think Bennett, Paup, Spikes, Bjg Ted, Isaiah Robertson, Vilipiano, Lofton.. A case can be made Stephon is at the top.

    Well you see she was my Hornets gal for a while down here, and now she's with Buff, and I'm having a moment. Diggs should smash... the competition this weekend

  9. 10 minutes ago, 34-78-83 said:

    Wallace, like every other Cb2 would on teams not named the Dolphins, will have his struggles vs. KC for sure! That doesn't mean we should get Gilly to play zone for 15 mil.

     

    can't do it for that price.. doesn't work. He is a mostly man coverage defender. If he would take less and the coaches think he can play in our scheme, sure but that's not gonna happen likely.

     

    And no, you DO NOT need to turn your head around in coverage. That is a 100% myth. They stopped enforcing that long ago. The in-broadcast refs that they have in many games these days have gone over this many times in their evals on interference calls. You're not alone in believing that its still a thing, but you're wrong.

     

    example-

    "Jay Stark

    , Two years working for an NFL team & 20 years working for the league.

    Answered December 23, 2015

    Originally Answered: Is it pass interference if a defensive back never looks back at the quarterback when the ball is thrown to the receiver?

    It is 'defensive' pass interference only if there is contact by the DB that inhibits the ability of the receiver to make the catch. He can go in front of the receiver, making incidental contact, in order to catch the ball. He may not drive through the receiver to make the catch. There is no rule that either the receiver or the defender must ever look back for the ball. It just makes sense for both of them to do so. While the ball is in the air, it is pass interference if either offensive or defensive player(s) inhibits (using contact) the ability of the opposing player, to catch the ball."

     

    and...

     

    "

    Richard Livornese

    Answered September 26, 2013

    Originally Answered: Is it pass interference if a defensive back never looks back at the quarterback when the ball is thrown to the receiver?

    What you describe is sometimes referred to as 'face guarding'. There was a time when this was a penalty in the NFL- it no longer is. Unless the defender makes contact with the receiver, it is not a penalty.

    (See Rule 8 Sec. 5 Article 1 in the NFL Rule book for the complete definition of what is pass interference as well as some things that are not)"

    Agreed it's not written, but if the contact is borderline, looking vs not looking is going to be the tie breaker right? Could be wrong here

    • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...