BillsShredder83
-
Posts
4,893 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by BillsShredder83
-
-
Jonnu makes more sense after seeing this today
https://x.com/TomPelissero/status/1940066374740799849?t=ArZhRrCWlhNkK1WlXlihzg&s=19
-
2 hours ago, DrDawkinstein said:
This is hilariously pathetic. Only the Johnsons would think this sounds good...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Which Games Should You Consider Selling Back?
Not every game on the schedule is equal in appeal or convenience. Here are some thoughts on which games may be worth holding onto, and which ones you might consider exchanging:
- Pittsburgh, Sunday, September 7 at 1 p.m.: The season opener always brings energy and strong attendance. Unless you absolutely cannot make it, this is one to hold onto.
- Buffalo, Sunday, September 14 at 1 p.m.: A divisional game with a rowdy crowd, but early in the season and right after the opener. If travel or back-to-back weekends are tough, this is a solid candidate for selling on the secondary market. You might be able to get more than face value.
- Dallas, Sunday, October 5: Cowboys fans travel well, and resale value will likely be high. If you aren’t going, this is another good secondary market game.
- Carolina, Sunday, October 19: Middle of the season, possibly lower stakes, and fewer traveling fans. This could be an ideal game to swap if your schedule gets crowded.
- Cleveland, Atlanta, Miami, New England: These late-season games could be meaningful if the Jets are in the playoff hunt, or challenging if weather and travel become an issue. If you are heading out of town for the holidays, exchanging one of these games might make sense.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Essentially telling fans they should just sell their seats on the secondary market to opposing fans for these games.
There is no reason, thats not financial, that would incentivize the team to do this. Are they re-selling the tickets for more themselves LOL? Or partnering with stubhub to pass it off to them, where they'll mark it up and kick the Jets a percentage of the overage LOL
Slimy feline behavior lol
-
1
-
On 6/10/2025 at 4:01 PM, blacklabel said:
Hmm...not sure who that would've been. My mind went to Manny Lawson maybe? He was around in the Rex era but I think he played for the Niners before the Bills.
Anderson maybe? Mark Anderson, or something like that.. its driving me nuts
-
1
-
-
19 minutes ago, Virgil said:
I wouldn't sign it unless it said convicted, but 🤷♂️
Me neither. Im not a victim blamer, but these guys are at a higher risk of a false accusation, even the guys who are careful. There are women who weaponize this kinda thing (see Trevor Bauer, Araiza). A woman who wanted to do that to you, would have major leverage knowing about that clause to try and bully a dude into settling out of court an a baseless & consensual encounter.
Wouldnt matter if i was the 2nd coming of Reggie White, Im not signing anything that says 'accusation or charge'. Its a dark thought, but a realistic one. Its painting a bullseye on your back. There are sufficient amounts of dirtballs in the NBA, but theres also a circle of hot females that target impregnations in the NBA as a paycheck. Itd be ignorant to pretend there arent women out there that would/have targeted this kinda thing before. Hell the Duke lacrosse lady did this, trying to get blood from a stone, those guys didnt even have sports money... was only going after mom & dad money.
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, SDS said:
Someone has to be first.
I’m not saying I follow this closely, but when teams have been affected by intolerable player behavior and players were cut, teams have sued to get a portion of their guaranteed money back. Without knowing more than what’s in this thread, maybe they’re just trying to codify this upfront. If that’s the case then I am all for it.
I don’t know what the meaning of default is in this scenario. If I knew that, it would clear things up.
If this is true, crazy to draft a guy this high IF thats such a major concern. Basically you took a dude you have zero trust in. Its like a last minute, day of wedding, pre-nup.
I guess the story isnt very clear until we find out what "default" means. I'd guess the term 'default' is intentionally vague, not defined well... to try and give them leeway to get out for any reason they want to. If its a "dirtball" clause, and defined clearly ---i.e. "sexual assault conviction (certainly not 'accusation'), weapons charge, violence charge", sure Stewart should generally have no problem signing it.
If it explicitly says the Bengals can get out of it for an injury, I think that would already be out there for us to know. Stewart would want to clear his name and prevent any 'tough guy to deal with' labels, PR battle.
My final educated guess is broad/vague verbiage AND an attempt to be sneaky about it! They really are doing their best to go back to the cellar with the #3 QB in the league
-
1
-
-
13 hours ago, JGMcD2 said:
Lol, it’s not the same thing. The Bengals are spending over 1/3 of their cap on three players.
2024 EaglesJalen Hurts: $13.6M cap hit (16th among QBs)
A.J. Brown: $12M (13th among WRs)
DeVonta Smith: $8.2M (23rd among WRs)
Total cap hit: $33.8M
Percentage of $255.4M cap: 13.2%
2025 Bengals
Joe Burrow: $46M cap hit (3rd among QBs)
Tee Higgins: $24M (6th among WRs)
Ja'Marr Chase: $23.5M (7th among WRs)
Total cap hit: $93.5M
Percentage of $279.2M cap: 33.5%
If they decide to give Hendrickson a cap hit around $30M (reportedly what he’s asking for based on the EDGE market), they’re going to be allocating 45% of their cap to four players that were already on their 9-8 team that missed the playoffs last season…
Ok I was with the other guy until now lol I will say every situation is different. Bengals situation is especially ugly because they have been shooting blanks in the draft.
45% on 4 players is excessive, but add in bad drafting and injuries amplifies how bad it looks. It'd be hard to let Tee walk, and this is why I want the Bills to run a WR pipeline....
It'd have been easier to trade him if you had a bonafide replacement behind him already on the team. You could get a nice haul and save money... or play the comp pick game.
Im not kidding when I say next year we should be looking into moving up for a premier #1 WR, and then take a high WR between round 1 - 3 each year. Or 1st - 4th minimum. Josh is going to increase these guys value, which will make WRs harder to retain and fit under the cap.
Soooo you can either swim upstream against it, or take a swing each year. Control costs. Keep giving Josh weapons, then worst case scenario we have some trade ammo, and we go next man up.
Josh is who got Gabe that Jax contract, which tells me he had good value in a trade if done one year earlier. Recycle that trade back into the team or back into WR room
-
4 hours ago, SoonerBillsFan said:
That is telling. If the staff thought this guy would have a shot at starting, I don't feel they would have spent all those resources on DE
It may be a fair assessment here, but bad blanket statement. You don't not make moves based on a 5th rd, 1 year player.
Dude would've got the same treatment if he was a 5-7sack guy. Can't count on him enough to pass up his players at his position, but doesn't mean the staff thinks he won't take a step either.
Hes a mini project, low cost, high upside. Love these kinds of picks. Hopefully he makes us look genius
3 hours ago, blacklabel said:Not sure why but since they picked him I've had this feeling that he could turn into a steal.
As others have stated, he gives them a different skill set at edge rusher. They've got the length guys like Groot and Epenesa, and now a length & power guy in Landon Jackson, Hoecht seems like a power rusher, Bosa when healthy can bring a little bit of speed and power. Solomon probably the speediest of the bunch tho and I think they could probably create some pressure packages that he's a part of.
It can vary depending on the matchups as well. If they have an opponent with a right tackle who really struggles with speed rushers then yeah maybe he's getting some snaps that week.
Who was the dude that did this for us maybe 7 years ago? Was really fast DE, but ppl b-worded he took a looping route on his pass rush.
Pretty sure he came from NE and or maybe Miami. I really liked him at the time but we cut him. Mark something maybe???
-
On 6/5/2025 at 9:29 AM, Einstein said:
I will never understand people advocating illegal streams.
For some reason, it being media makes it pallatable for people to say things like like this. But most of us would never say “oh that restaurant meal was expensive - but there are ways to skip out the door before paying without the waitress knowing”.
Why not just straight up say “i’m a thief”?
Straight up, I'm a thief
..... oh no how will my friends and family ever trust me again LoL
Theres not a single corporate product or aspect of govt (essential or not) in existence, where I can go one full day without being ripped off a dozen or more times... just by opening my eyes in the morning. The working man in this country owes nothing to any of these people except for a tar and feathering.
But yes, I'm gunna hold a vigil for the corporations as victims of petty theft, and ignore the gunpoint robbery the middle class is subjected to on the daily. 👌
-
1
-
2
-
1
-
-
On 6/3/2025 at 9:24 PM, Victory Formation said:
I never liked the pick but I am going to give him a fair shake. I think that the best case scenario is Keon will be a low end #1 or a high end #2 but in all likelihood I think he’ll be an average #2.
I think this could hinge on Brady as much as it does Keon. Find a way to get him the ball a few times a game, in the short-intermediate with a full head of steam and he has a killer year. every slant he caught like this last year looked like it had house call potential, between his physicality and long-speed. sounds like the physicality should notch up this year too
-
20 hours ago, NewEra said:
It’s not his forte, but zero power is a massive exaggeration made in order to try and prove your side of the argument.
Fair, I was a understating my true point. Hes gotten better since his rookie year w/ contact but i see too many shoe string tackles. dudes "power" is that he is hard to get a hand on, a very valid skill set, i just dont think its going to lend itself well to a team with even a middling OL. if we put a good OL out there like we do, theres no need to pay a one-dimensional RB that kinda money. if he can become a pass blocker and see the field on 3rd down more, AND he proves that he can produce, or we find a way to get more production passing to him, you could possibly defend paying him... but he has not been the 3rd down back we thought we were signing up for when drafting him. do i think he can be better in the passing game, i do. for whatever reason it hasnt materialized. even if he does have significant upside to that skill, if we cant scheme it and find a way to use it.... that skill doesnt help us.
if brady wants us to retain him, he better find a way this year to materialize it. id be more than happy to pay him IF (or watch someone else do it if he completely prices himself out w/ us) he can turn into a true dual threat. we've had very weak outside WR play as of late, we need a guy to stop the defense from being able to narrow the field horizontally.
i obviously like having the guys talents around, i just cant justify that kinda money for what he currently brings to the table. thats not even necessarily on him, but i think we can get very similar production at significantly cheaper prices... and Davis looks like he'll be an upgrade in the passing game to me. i also certainly think we can make up for the production drop off through Josh throwing the ball a touch more. I think we could find out Ray-Day is better suited for this offense!
-
2 hours ago, Bills!Win! said:
Since it’s the time of year for offseason topics, what are some Bills games that still haunt you that you will never rewatch? NFL network is always showing replays. When the following games come on I turn my head or throw up. To this day I have never rewatched the following as they are too painful to relive.
Bill Titans wildcard - January 2000Bills Cowboys - MNF October 2007
Bills Browns - MNF November 2008
Bills Patriots - MNF September 2009
Bills Chiefs Divisional - January 2022
Bills Bengals Divisional - January 2023
Bills Broncos - MNF November 2023
Bills Chiefs Divisional - January 2024
Bills Chiefs Championship - January 2024
Just about every other game since 2000 I have watched highlights or rewatched a condensed version at some point.
What are yours?
The regular season ones wouldnt bother me at all... the playoff losses are never rewatchable. Any playoff Chiefs games? NF'ing way, especially the first AFCCG. Josh's first playoff game in Houston is a no. Forward lateral game? Was the first time I remember absolutely bawling about a football game, I hate seeing that play to this day.... only 6months before that my first time bawling at any sports game, and it was hockey. These should surprise nobody.
What DID* surprise me, I was turning 3yrs old when Wide Right happened, and during covid I was rewatching classic Bills game I wasnt old enough to remember. The Houston comeback game, shellacking Bengals in AFC Champ game, and any SB Run era playoff games I could find. Was really cool to watch as somebody who knows the history, but cant firsthand remember any/much of Kelly, Bruce, Andre, Thurman's Prime.
I was having a grand ole time!!! I knew watching the Cowboys smackdowns would have 0 entertainment value, so I figured Wide Right Game could be a fun watch. I dont have an authentic memory/attachment to that game and I knew the ending obviously. .... was a fun game to watch, but seeing the context of how that kick came to be, made it absolutely brutal all over again. I don't remember that game at all, but damn it felt like I was. Cant say I recommend that to anyone LOL
1 hour ago, mushypeaches said:I have never rewatched any Bills playoff loss.
Even from an analytical standpoint, there's still too much emotion involved for it to be a worthwhile experience
The only exception I've ever made is the 1989 loss at Cleveland - that was such a wildly entertaining back-and-forth game, and while I still cringe at Ronnie Harmon's alligator arms, I could bear the anguish knowing that we were turning into a juggernaut the next 4 seasons.
Man I wish I could've experienced Bills/Chiefs as even a neutral viewer. In my head I know that's gotta be a top 10 all time playoff game. But I dont even like seeing the highlights of us going up late in that one. I will NEVER rewatch that
-
1
-
-
17 hours ago, The Wiz said:
The difference is that when Beane says "I don't want my 60m dollar QB just handing off to a 20m dollar RB" he's got a good point. Unlike Joe Schoen talking about Daniel Jones.
I don't think Cook is going to get the same level of production. Probably 10-11 TDs is my guess. I think the problem that Cook doesn't realize is that just like with Barkley, he's running behind one of the better O-lines in the league. The second he gets his 20m and goes to a team like the Pats/Colts, his production is likely going to fall off a cliff.
Bingo. He is not a back that can run behind a weak line. 0 power. Hes only dangerous staying clean in the backfield and through the hole into the secondary... eating once in the secondary is a real skill set, just not one we have the luxury of paying for.
Give that $$ to a WR or somewhere else next year. I'll die on that hill
-
20 hours ago, eee1776 said:
How about someone being honorable enough to play out the contract he signed.
I don't blame him at all. RBs have like a 5 year shelf life... and 1st rders get 5 year rookie deals (i know cook was 2nd). Nflpa will have to renegotiate the RB rookie contracts to ever get this fixed.
Cook is worth a raise, and someone will give it to him, just not us and shouldn't be.
Our OL parts the damn red sea. Im ready to see Ray Davis take the crown here. Dude finished the season with nearly as many yards and more receiving TDs than Cook, with probably 25% of the snaps. He can pass block. Running the ball won't be a problem, and Davis will do more in the pass game.
Why in tf would we pay Cook? Absolutely insane. No hyperbole trade him at the top of his value. Laugh all you want but Ray is a better fit for our run game too IMO. Ready to get roasted 🤷
-
18 hours ago, sunshynman said:
Brady says Kincaid putting in the work. Let's hope it translates.
What a dumb "article" from Florio. It's literally nothing. I get its the offseason but atleast string it together with other teams nfl news like a quick hit. I got the same exact thing out of the headline as reading the article. Such a hack
-
1
-
-
3 hours ago, 3rdand12 said:
He has to pass the Team Physical.
Patriots Dr call on this one.
They can dump him if he fails Diggs. It's in the contract
Thanks PFT
Present.
I suspect that is all he is doing
Why would any team ink that kind of deal (or really any deal) without getting a physical. I assumed when terms get announced a guy has 24hrs to get there for physical kinda thing. When you spend solid $$ on a player from FA; its not only hitvhing your boat to a guy, its also removing yourself from a certain tier of FA money..... so God forbid you ink someone, then find out they cant pass a physical, but the other guys you were courting have moved on and found a new team.
Absolutely bonkers if this is how it works. How does a full month pass without being sure on the physical?
-
1
-
-
On 5/31/2025 at 2:34 PM, Mr. WEO said:
the better question is what didn't Beane understand about Diggs before he traded for him?
Diggs's early end in Buffalo was completely predictable to many.......
What is there to gripe about in the zoomed out look? First, he wasnt a Pickens or AB level of malcontent. Dude wanted money and more targets... literally EVERY WR in the NFL. He was young and hadnt peaked yet. He helped Josh develop, we got 2 absolutely elite years out of him, leading the league in yards one of them.
^^looking at this, we traded a 1st (and 5th?), and recouped a 2nd... So we netted all the above, for the equivalent of a 1 round trade back?
I WISH WE COULD MAKE THIS KIND OF MISTAKE THIS OFF-SEASON.
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
2
-
-
On 5/27/2025 at 8:47 PM, SoonerBillsFan said:
He has to get mentally tougher
I think you can be mentally & physically tough while being being unsure of your post injury capabilities. Dude was healthy through college wasnt he? I think he can be nasty in the run game, appears like a haul to bring down once hes got the ball, so im willing to give him the pass here. Dude had just started to get the earliest signs of momentum going and then had it killed by a month off the field. Probably very hard to get that train going again as a Rookie & as somebody whos been football healthy his whole life
-
1
-
-
On 5/25/2025 at 5:09 PM, folz said:
Here is where the Bills rank in both passing and rushing attempts and yards over the last 5 years:
PASSING RUSHING
YEAR Atts Yds Atts Yds
2024 26th 9th 9th 9th
2023 16th 8th 5th 7th
2022 14th 8th 20th 9th
2021 5th 9th 13th 6th
2020 11th 3rd 17th 20th
Not quite sure what to make of all of that. You can kind of see the flip in the rushing and passing attempts over the last two years, but the strange thing is that regardless of attempts, our overall ranking in yards has stayed pretty consistent over the last four years (2020 being the only outlier).
Bills passing attempts and yards last 5 years (fyi):
2024: 520 for 3,875
2023: 579 for 4,154
2022: 574 for 4,129
2021: 655 for 4,284
2020: 596 for 4,620
Yeah Elijah Moore, and to a lesser extent Curtis Samuel, are the wild cards. I'm an optimistic fan, so I still think Samuel is a really good player and Moore is probably better than he's been able to show with the circumstances he was in (and he hasn't been a slouch as it is). It's just so hard to find enough balls to go around. Which is why I find it funny when people complain about weapons for Josh. We don't have that All-Pro #1 WR, but I think we have a ton of weapons (of course, I'm probably also higher on Keon, Kincaid, and Samuel in particular than some fans at this point). But...Shakir, Palmer, Coleman, Samuel, Moore, Kincaid, Knox, Cook, Davis, and Johnson. That's 10 guys that are already proven in the league (well not sure if you would call Keon proven yet, but...). I think it's a pretty strong and solid cast overall. With the "everybody eats" mentality, it may come down to the hot hand, whose playing best at any given time (and also designing certain games for certain players based on opponents). So, for instance, if they think speed would work better against a particular defense, then maybe Moore and Samuel get more snaps than Keon and/or Palmer that particular game. And of course, there is a chance that Moore plays well and demands more playing time. But as it is right now, my guess would be that he and Samuel will be used more situationally (so will be 4th and 5th in WR targets). But who knows. It will be fun to see how they try to use everyone this season.
Great post. I'll just throw in my 2 cents on the bolded. While I'd love to have an All-Pro WR, I know its not realistic unless we hit jackpot on a guy at the end of the 1st one year.
Adding one serious outside threat forces defenses to be more multi-dimensional than they have to be now (one reason Spags has owned us). Defenses against us dont have to worry about anybody getting over the top of them,(thats been beat ad nauseum) allowing them to crowd the line more... but even more troublesome is not having a horizontal field stretch.
No deep threat + Bad outside WR's creates a nasty venn diagram, where defenses can put 70% of their focus and personnel in shallow - intermediate & condense to the middle.... which happens to be where we are most strong. We run the ball well, that ven diagram is very favorable to a defense wanting to stop the run. We also get the majority of our passing game from inside the hashes.... same spot where the defense wants to be.
We're throttling our own strengths by not having an outside guy... plus, were missing out on a ton of gains to be had on the outside. Obv there's nothing we can do to fix it now, except pray that somebody breaks out between between Moore, Coleman or Palmer. Its possible.
My thing is I really feel like we're one top 20 outside WR away from being unstoppable. Dude wouldnt even need to dominate like 2020 & 2021 Diggs. We could move up and down the field, in whatever manner we would like, completely dictating the pace. Getting just a bit more consistency outta the offense, can lead to our DL getting more opportunities to just pin their ears back and rush the pass. I loved our draft though, and my God do I pray we can finally address the WR position better next year
-
3
-
1
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Logic said:
I remember the shock I felt when Brandon Beane came in and immediately dealt Darby and Watkins.
It immediately signaled two things to me: One, he and McDermott were trying to build a culture, and only wanted players that fit that culture. And two, they were gonna be drafting a quarterback in 2018 come hell or high water, and this was the first move made with an eye toward positioning them for a potential move up the board.
Always thought the way Beane pulled off those moves nearly simultaneously was cool, as was the fact that he got replacement players at each position that he traded away, simultaneously planning for the future but signaling to the locker room and fans that they weren't throwing in the towel on the present.
Other than that, as far as Darby himself, all I can say is: Good, solid, athletic man corner. Never a world beater, but usually a plus player when he was healthy. Carved out a nice, long, respectable NFL career. Here's wishing him a happy retirement.Was Darby not a culture fit? I cant remember anything from then. Or was that a scheme fit thing? The Sammy trade at the time was bigger news to most. Was he traded after only his rookie year here?
-
19 hours ago, Einstein said:
Yeah I'm shocked by the amount of people claiming to have been to all these open-bar weddings in the 70's. It was quite rare back then (in my neck of the woods anyway) and people would almost brag about it had they been to one. Especially considering that the average cost of a wedding back then was only $2k. I just did a little research and found a post by a bartender who did weddings in the 70's - he said the open bar was around $600 for 2 hours. So the open bar would have been about 30% of the total wedding cost.
Long story short, maybe the others in this thread have very affluent friends. Or maybe you and I just grew up around very poor people 🤣This chat is going through a culture shock of non-buffalo events having infinitely less alcoholics. I knew I was an alcoholic in Buffalo, then I moved and realized exactly how unhealthy that cities relationship is with booze lol
I live near a bar and am always shocked to see the crowds start leaving from 10-11p. When I drank, we were just finishing up pre-gaming at a house LOL
Columbian Marching Powder would get the bullpen call right about midnight! Weaklings! Thank God I got sober lol def would've missed out on seeing Buff get a ring
-
4
-
-
9 hours ago, dave mcbride said:
Keep on believin’. Also, check out @BADOLBILZ ‘s post above.
Same ppl that cried when they found out Hulk Hogan wasnt just eating his veggies nad saying his prayers before bed LOL
-
1
-
-
On 5/28/2025 at 7:21 PM, Ethan in Cleveland said:
It's ok to disagree. I think he's better at his position that Oliver, Rousseau, Knox, Benford, and every other player except Milano, White, and Allen were at the time they got their second contracts. He's an elite player that should get paid as such.
I fully admit I am biased by running backs that can catch the ball out of the backfield. Thurman Thomas not Kelly was my favorite player of the 1990's teams. I loved watching players like Tomlinson, Faulk, and Edgerrin James. I value them more than WRs. I know the league, the market, and this board disagrees.
For the record I fully support the extensions Benford, Rousseau, and Shakir got. All are very good players and all the deals were fair for both sides. Just hope Beane trims the money spent by getting rid of Epenesa, DQ, Samuel, and moving on or redoing the Milano and Knox contracts by next year. That should free up enough money to pay Cook either on the franchise tag or with an extension.
Were there notable stats showing progress with Cook's hands? I'll be honest, my knee jerk reaction is 'he drops a decent amount of very catchable balls', but I wouldnt be shocked if I didn't notice/forgot over past several months. I cant specifically recall any brutal drops
EDIT: nope. Im not a hater, and ill 100% give him credit for doing a ton of work rushing the ball, I think he had his best season by far (TD's skyrocketed)
.... but last years receiving stats are bunk! After seeing this I especially cant justify paying him Saquan/McCaff type money. Just no way! In fact this is an incredibly mediocre pass catching season for any starting RB, let alone a premier back.
-
1
-
-
2 hours ago, MikePJ76 said:
I remember in high school trying desperately to gain weight for baseball. I worked my tail off. I just could not gained weight. I was way too active.
I went to my doctor because my parents made me, to see which weight gain supplement and creatine he would recommend to help me add weight with my lifting routine. He was a younger doctor and a former college athlete, he looked right at me and said never put that stuff in your body, ever especially the creatine. That was that.
You really dodged a bullet there LOL
Doctors also used to manually stimulate women for "hysteria" treatment. Maybe science evolves
26 minutes ago, Special K said:I think the drugs are always ahead of the tests.
I was watching a documentary about Ben Johnson's positive steroid test in the 1988 Olympics.
A doctor picked 9 random "clean" blood samples across all sports in the 1988 Olympics, and tested them using 1992 testing specifications, and 8 of the 9 samples came back as "positive" for steroids.
Just shows that the drug makers are unfortunately always ahead of the drug enforcers.
It's either this, or athletes stopped looking for an edge..... hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm. The same pool of guys who crash drunk driving and beat up their wives, must have some unique moral code where they draw a hard line at PED's
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
-
3 hours ago, MiracleAtRich1393 said:
I played pickup pickleball last night with a totally random guy who jumped in and completely schooled me & my friends. I made a passing joke like "I'm getting old" at the end (I'm 41) and he went on a rant about how he just turned 60 and me and my friends all need to get on testosterone supplements, he started when he was 45 and wished he'd done it sooner. Like he would not let it go, he was adamant that we do it. Honestly it was a great advertisement for it, the guy was absolutely shredded and looked as young or younger than me. It was pretty eye opening not gonna lie.
When he said supplements, he meant TRT lol there are no supplements that work. If you have the health insurance to jump on TRT, the guy isnt wrong!! Living below your potential quality of life, because grampa used to say "rOgEr MaRis WaS tHe oNlY ReAl bAlL pLaYeR" is silly. No matter where you land on PED's in sports, theres nothing wrong AT ALL with better living through science under a doctors care. If you're done having kids, and your test is in the gutter, and you're not playing pro-ball; by all means feel free to take advantage of the medical advancements that we have
-
1
-
TE Darren Waller comes out of retirement and traded to Dolphins
in The Stadium Wall
Posted
nah, i think he retired too suddenly. i saw the article about him knowing he was retiring after playing us, and being used like a FullBack. Unless im mixing them up with a previous regime, MIA's TE usage is fairly friendly to a dude who wants to catch the ball more than block (Gesecki comes to mind). I dont think he changes their bad season projection at all, but I bet he has a pretty good year