
The Frankish Reich
Community Member-
Posts
13,444 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by The Frankish Reich
-
Apparently the defense didn't object for a long time to the "scene setting" testimony Stormy was going into. So the judge at first intervened (I've had this happen to me) by telling the DA "I'm not interested in that." Then we got some objections. The worst that can happen (realistically) is that the judge admonishes the jury not to consider certain things other than that Trump did have sex with her. Unlikely to be considered reversible error on appeal if he is convicted.
-
Really deserves its own thread. She's still testifying. Trump's wingman invites her to "dinner" with the boss. She meets him in his hotel room. He answers in satin pajamas. Starts asking her about her life and career, whether she's tested for STDs, etc. Trump: "you remind me of my daughter." 🤮 Yeah, that's normal.
-
MSNBC (gasp!) is doing a good job of summarizing testimony in real time. And their legal commenters are surprisingly even-handed. So now we know a little more about Trump's game. It wasn't just "grab 'em by the p[]ssy." No, he had his wingman approach Stormy to say that Trump would like to have dinner with her. She goes to his room. He's in silk pajamas (!) She asks him to change for dinner. He doesn't "just start kissing her." He pretends to be interested in her life. And then? Well, I guess we'll hear that soon.
-
Glenn Reynolds is an actual law prof. He obviously is more interested in his blogging career now. But he is a serious person. And he's right: the "over criminalization" thing is a problem. So like he says, go ahead and try to correct what you think is selective prosecution through the political/electoral system. If we believe Trump, that is where Reynolds is wrong. Trump believes that these prosecutions make him more popular and more likely to be elected. So much for this comment:
-
This is the stupidest "there must have been fraud" theory ever. How many people flocked to Eugene McCarthy rallies in 1968? George Wallace rallies that same year? As opposed to Nixon rallies. Did more people show up for Bernie vs. Hillary? What makes anyone think that those who attend rallies are representative of the electorate in general?