My mistake slick, I had it backwards. I didn't care to read into during the season and from what I've read (very limited with the arrival of my son, I digress) It seemed like it has been both sides having a pissing contest with each other. My opinion on the ordeal changes slightly now. If the agreement is good through 2013, what makes it legal for the owners to lockout the players? This isn't the same as the NHL lockout is it as their agreement did expire?
You don't have to yell either, the babys sleeping