Big Blitz

And Ds just belittled all those “conspiracy theorists.” Pleading the 5th to the question “were you ever told by the Biden administration to hide his health status” is admitting they did, they all lied, and should never hold office again That memo was leaked to axios bc they knew his testimony was coming this week.

The moment the Biden administration, its media, and their voters are shown to have been complicit in the biggest scandal in the history of the United States Don’t talk to us about transparency you freaking loser

How is this happening??? These people are here illegally and most likely these are the ones tied to cartels. The Democrats would rather the government come after you for failing to enforce social distancing at your restaurant.

This is so awesome to know the system is working. He didn’t vote bc he can’t. You can believe him if you want that he supported him. Given he’s got a camera on him, that’s a set up. Like Maryland Father of the year. And I guarantee his “plight” will be resolved.

Wealthy young trust fund brats who have zero concept of money or the real world dictating socialism to the 'working people'. It's actually disgusting.

He stopped quoting the pedos at the Lincoln Project. I wonder why.

Homeloser is in free fall. 10 years and counting. Baseless attack on the SOD. And this was 10 days ago. And it was the 3rd time Hegseth did this since the spring. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna216790 Note all the usual sources: - “Officials” - Democrats - Trust us bro, Biden is sharp as a tack

We told you.

And this is what Trump was saying. If he releases the names of those that engaged in the sick stuff - and doesn’t release the names of everyone else bc all they did was give him money to invest and just thought they were going to lavish parties - then Trump is just politically assassinating people, abuse of power, he’s protecting his friends, etc. This explanation makes the most sense So is there a way to know who the “innocent” ones are, redact them, and release the bad ones. If there is a way to do that, let us know. “I think there are people within the establishment—I don't know if they partook in the his sick things he was doing—but they have some association with him and they gave him money to invest when there was no reason to hire someone like that.” “He got a half a billion dollars somehow, from people who were mainstream establishmentarians on the basis that he was going to blackmail them.” “I think those names are numerous and I think the Trump administration thought, well we're going to release this and there's some crazy people that we don't care about, are going to be embarrassed....and then all the sudden, they got a lot of calls.” “Said, why are you doing this? I didn't do this, I went down to the island once, I was on a plane, I didn't touch anybody.” “There's a lot of people who were very powerful who were giving him money or were trafficking with him, not necessarily all them engaging in what he was doing, but just the association with him.” “And I think they're putting pressure on people. I really do.”

Cope and seethe.

More lies: They cut out what he said right after that. Play it beyond the 16 seconds of clip. After a lukewarm yes he flat out says “but I might not. You don’t want to effect people’s lives.” Bondi: "It's sitting on my desk right now to review. Um, that's been a directive by President Trump. I'm reviewing that, I'm reviewing JFK files, MLK files, that's all in the process of being reviewed because that was done at the directive of the president from all of these agencies." Roberts: "So, so have you seen anything that you said, Oh My Gosh?" Bondi: "Not yet."

Bondi is bombastic. She was asked in February and she said “she had the FILES on her desk to be reviewed.” But the impression wasn’t “we have to review” the impression was “we got names and they’re coming.” Trump himself always issued caution about the documents no matter what Homeloser is trying say today. He always said “I’ll release them BUT..” They have more. This leak caught them off guard and bc they aren’t career politicians corrupt to the core they didn’t know how to respond. If they were really shady and a bunch of evil pedo defending liars why didn’t they just deny the leak? Do with the list what Biden did which was never release it or talk about it. Something is up. Nothing official from anyone. And apparently it’s still an open investigation.

Save it all for 2028 Reminder, that despite all the hysteria over the last few days, absolutely nothing has been officially stated by the Trump admin. The leaked memo from Axios was a very informal draft, not finalized, no header, no date, no signature, and there has been no official statement from the FBI/DOJ on the Epstein matter. No authority ever officially said the Epstein case was closed. It was just an Axios article, with an alleged leaked draft of a memo, followed by an Internet frenzy. Nothing was official. But the FBI/DOJ just officially admitted in court, that their search efforts for Epstein information are STILL ONGOING, meaning that this is not over, and that the Deep State have likely either hidden or destroyed the most incriminating information about the Epstein operation, and presumably other topics as well.

Why were illegals getting Medicaid?

Thousand more like this that Ds are actively trying to prevent law enforcement from arresting.

Hahahahaha look at this clown nodding along with him

We always do. When you raise minimum wage. When you impose regulations. Etc. The horror stories of “ugh, you idiots are now going to pay 80% more for an iPhone” are just ridiculous. It’s not 1929 anymore. How many times have we said this. And like he says here and I agree - they’re neither a panacea nor a poison. The manufacturing long run goals are true; so is the desire for revenue and increasing leverage with competitors. https://fortune.com/2025/01/05/tariffs-donald-trump-us-economy-jobs-wages-producers-consumers/ https://finance.yahoo.com/news/different-now-tariffs-boost-u-205119631.html In a column in Foreign Affairs late last month, he argued that today's U.S. economy is much different from the one that was crushed by disastrous tariffs in the 1930s. The key difference is that America now has excessively high consumption, while it had low consumption and excess savings when the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act was passed in 1930…. …But Pettis cautioned that tariffs are neither a panacea nor poison, because their impact varies depending on what the economic circumstances are. In the case of the Smoot-Hawley tariffs, they went into effect during the Great Depression, when demand was crashing as other countries were taking similar steps on trade. The U.S. also had the world's largest trade surplus and top global exporters with production outstripping domestic demand. Fast-forward to today: The economy is nearly the total opposite and is no longer producing far more than it can consume, Pettis noted. While tariffs act as a tax on consumers, they also essentially subsidize domestic producers, who can add jobs and raise wages that eventually lead to more consumption, he explained. But if U.S. firms were facing weak domestic demand, tariffs would make matters worse. And if the global economy couldn't absorb more U.S. exports, then tariffs would depress domestic production. "In this case, tariffs (properly implemented) would have the opposite effect of Smoot-Hawley," Pettis added. "By taxing consumption to subsidize production, modern-day tariffs would redirect a portion of U.S. demand toward increasing the total amount of goods and services produced at home. That would lead U.S. GDP to rise, resulting in higher employment, higher wages, and less debt." Since Americans are the world's consumers of last resort, tariffs would serve another purpose too: U.S. producers would no longer have to accommodate the needs of foreign rivals, he said. Rather than aiming to protect certain sectors or businesses, tariffs could counter the economy's "pro-consumption and antiproduction" stance. "In the end, tariffs are simply one among many tools that can improve economic outcomes under some conditions and depress them under others," Pettis pointed out. "In an economy suffering from excess consumption, low savings, and a declining manufacturing share of GDP, the focus of economists should be on the causes of these conditions and the policies that might reverse them." Manufacturing as a share of GDP has gone from roughly 30 percent in the 1920s to less then 10 percent today. https://prosperousamerica.org/u-s-manufacturings-shrinking-share-of-gdp-and-how-to-catch-up/

Good. Do Ohio to.

No no no. Everything must be awful. Jon Oliver said so!

It just hit me. HomeloserTime has been doing this for 10 years! Just Imagine that. Spending dam near every single day posting about 1 man. Not an issue, or principles HomeloserTime cares about. There isn’t any. Just one man. Trump. All his posts are about Trump - most of them dumb low info memes or Last Week Tonight loser commentary. Do any conservatives here still post anything about Obama - or Biden unless they are completely relevant to the discussion? Like today Biden’s doc refusing to testify bc he knows. Just insane. What a waste of time - and by the time Trump leaves - near 4 years from now - it will be almost 14 years of one man occupying and living rent free in his head. The subject of daily posts. And that just makes me