Arkady Renko

No, it's because ESPN hires women over men time after time. An alumnus at ESPN Radio asked our student-run radio station while I was in school if anyone was interested in working for the ESPN Radio. The catch? He only wanted women and offerred positions to girls outside of the sports department and would not even return phone calls of any of the guys in the sports department.

I think both are great quarterbacks, but I feel that if we swapped the players, Manning would be more likely to succeed in New England than Brady in Indianapolis.

The only problem is that they constantly show these skits so they have lost their humor to me for the most part.

I respectfully disagree with that ageist statement! I am a eighty-seven year old Antarctican-American astronaut and I found the skit humorous.

Hockey will always struggle on some level because most Americans simply do not play the game growing up. Changing rules will not affect this problem.

Actually, when people looked into to Brady's deal it was not that impressive a sacrifice.

That's probably why Mark Rypien and Jeff Hostetler won Super Bowls.

Maybe 50% or something? Better to keep it for the next cheating whore you want to marry.

Do girls usually give back the ring if they are dumped for cheating?

Most family men I know do not want to have some other dude screwing their wife or not be taking care of his family.

Enh, I am pretty big Bills fan and hardly ever buy any team gear.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20050608/lf_af...42956&printer=1

Wasn't Howard Simon nice enough to say some kind words to his listeners on this very board? I think we should keep that in mind.

I truly feel that Miami fans are more legit. Look at Lakers games to get a sniff of what a luxury box laden stadium would mean for football in LA.

Hmm.. actually is there any city that used to have an NFL team in the last forty years that does not have one now outside of Los Angeles?

Buffalo apparently is not rich enough to support football, but Mexico City is?

Almost as bad as having the city of Indianapolis affixed in front of the name "Colts".

While the federal government's laws take precedent over state laws by default, there are restrictions and that's where this case hinged. Unfortunately that battle has been pretty much lost. Again, the late decisions during the New Deal era ended most of the restrictions on federal power within the states. Now many things that should be controlled by the states, like the legal drinking age, has been taken away by the federal government through the blackmail of state aid. Don't want to have a 21 year old limit for drinking, no highway funding, etc. Basically we took away your money but we won't give it back until your state does what we want. Sometimes this works in the favor of my politics, sometimes not, but I regret something was lost in this change.

The argument in fact did hinge on the interstate commerce clause as the question was whether the federal government had the right to supercede a state rule when the product was produced in state. So... before you "split hairs" you should look into more than just one superficial article.

Well you know that in the negotiations for Silver's support they were going to give Lower Manhattan a whole bunch of tax breaks, like the state can afford that. I seem to remember there being an economically distressed part of the state called upriver or upnorth or something...

She looked like pure crap in Birth which was terrible even ignoring her short hair.

She looked like pure crap in Birth which was terrible outside of her short hair.

That was done a month ago, I think. Bush even went. The thanks of course should only go to those soldiers and not to the leadership that collaborated with the Nazis until they were attacked and occupied Eastern Europe for 50 years afterwards and killed more than 20 million of its own people by and by.

Here, here!

The interstate commerce clause died with the New Deal.