Big Gun

Tyrod did have more pass attempts his senior year (315) than did Peterman in either year (313 + 306) at Pitt.

Neither did Tyrod

If you know football like you say you do, then you would also acknowledge that not all those interceptions were on NP and he was also put into a no win situation. You knew that though, right? Yeah it was so ugly and extreme I don't believe that half of football defines how good or bad NP really is. Just like if he had thrown 5 TDs in a half, I equally wouldn't think he would have been HOF worthy either.

What is the main criteria the HOF uses to evaluate a QBs worthiness to get enshrined?

Torn knee bone...

Don't forget Dallas.

Lighten up Francis

So he pulled a Tyrod on that play, it's expected of a rookie not a 7 year vet.

Right, Tyord is going to throw for 400 and have 3 TD because KC and their super bowl HC won't follow prior teams and won't attempt or don't have a clue how to make Tyrod be a QB.

You mean those absolutely pedestrian numbers from 4 Raider turnovers. 20-27 165 yards 1 TD 6 rushes 1 yard 1 TD We shall see but why would KC NOT follow the gameplan that the Jets, Saints and Ravens used? IDK man, Tyrod is not taking the Bills anywhere, if you think so then more power to you. Kind of like they set Peterman up to fail against the Chargers.

Unfortunately I don't think the Rose Bowl is going away anytime soon.

Yeah because 5 pics and a 54-24 loss is sooooooo much worse than a 56 yard pass game and 47-10 loss. Gimme a break!

Wow, i'm speechless.

Fair and easy question that seems to melt brain cells of a certain group.

61 TDs and 20 turnovers if you want to get technical and exclude his 2 int and 1 rushing TD in Balt. Whatever fits your agenda I guess. I was just going by his career stats.

Of course he will once garbage time hits. Before that time though, 5 yard pass on 3rd and 10 or 5 yard scramble on 3rd and 10 rinse and repeat. At the end of the day after he does that 5 times each coupled with some garbage time stats all the Tyrod stat defenders will say, see his TD % is good, his Int were low, his rush yards are good, his QBR is good, and most importantly he is still 20-19 career record, etc., it's all bunk. The guy stinks, end the experiment that should have ended last season, please. Because the Jets and Saints had no clue on how to defend him, right so the Chiefs are going to totally not try and do the same thing.

48 TDs passing 14 TDs rushing 17 interceptions 16 fumbles (don't know how many were lost fumbles)

So 56 yards passing, 3 and out over and over is an acceptable way of throwing the game away, and 5 ints is an unacceptable way? Ok whatever! 54-24 or 47-10 is there really a difference, I don't see one.

Not if the Chiefs make him be a quarterback.

And/or only look at the box score and stats.

It's been said over and over and over that yards don't mean a damn thing.

5 pics, constant checkdowns to 3 and out punts, is there really a difference?

No, and the coaches didn't think so either, and it's been a lot more than just one bad game.