BillsFanNC
-
Posts
23,570 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by BillsFanNC
-
-
Lost a bit off his fastball, eh King?
-
-
⬆️
Two useful idiots.
On ignore.
-
1
-
-
14 minutes ago, Tenhigh said:
Dude, have you totally given up
on talking to people without insulting themliving under a blue sky?FIFY.
And the answer is yes.
-
1
-
-
In DC, NYC and elsewhere you can get a conviction on The Great Orange Menace for removing a mattress tag.
And useful idiots will insist the case was bulletproof, as rock solid as it gets, all while accusing you of being blind.
So it goes with useful idiots.
-
-
-
-
-
-
⬆️
The King regurgitating leftist crap from its masters?
Yup.
-
1
-
1
-
-
Fact check: True
-
NEW: With DC trial at a standstill, classified docs case in Florida continues its slog.
Judge Cannon to hold sealed hearings next week to determine which classified discovery Trump and co-defendants can access to prepare for trial. Smith wants to keep a massive trove of material away from Trump and his co-defendants; defense counsel wants it. Cannon held a 3-hour hearing last week with Jack Smith's team to discuss his opposition:
-
At the same time Sen Lankford wants to give DC federal judges control over our immigration system, the courthouse is bracing for a major sh*tshow--in fact, it already is--if SCOTUS reverses an appellate court decision on DOJ's application of 1512c2, obstruction of an official proceeding.
Every judge except one (Nichols) refused to dismiss the post-Enron law DOJ slapped against 320+ J6ers and Donald Trump.
But since SCOTUS granted cert in December, some judges have released a few from prison, delayed sentencing and trials for others, and urged DOJ to seek plea deals on other counts. (This is Judge Beryl Howell, former chief judge, during a hearing a few days after SCOTUS took the case.)
It is impossible to overstate just what a black eye this will be for the entire DC district court, the DC US attorney's office, and the entire DOJ if SCOTUS overturns how DOJ used the statute.
These are the same judges Lankford and others want to empower in deciding the "constitutionality" of his alleged immigration bill.
-
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1 minute ago, B-Man said:
I disagree.
They will come for you eventually.
.
Tongue was planted firmly in cheek.
-
2
-
-
15 minutes ago, SydneyBillsFan said:
Look, I dunno.
I just saw the Oklahoma Rep Senator James Lankford present a semi-reasonable case to accept the bill:
- $650 million for wall building
- More money for deportation flights
- When 5000 migrants cross in a day, they all get deported
- Families get processed within a few weeks
It's better than what you have now. But will it be enough to get House support?
It's not reasonable. Or even semi-reasonable.
What we have now is only happening because the Biden regime ignores the current laws already on the books.
It's like ignoring the 0.08% BAC level for DUI and only prosecuting those that are >0.2%. Then negotiating a new law where the new legal limit is 0.14% and saying its better than what we currently have.
The communists opened the floodgates and made the problem so bad hoping people will accept anything less than the current invasion.
Don't fall for commie tactics.
-
Beyond a reasonable doubt?
Nope
Preponderance of evidence?
Nope
Orange man guilty by accusation?
Yup.
-
2
-
-
Fact check: True
Which books will you burn?
in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Posted