BillsFanNC

😂 cope and seethe

Ignoring the evidence of your eyes and ears on Biden's dementia for four years is one thing, then there's saying.. yeah didn't everyone know that THE FRIGGIN POTUS was an empty vessel? So what? Just move on already. EMBARRASSING. Both are massive leftist copes and anyone occupying that ground as part of the current political "discussion" deserves no more than being ignored. Everyone knows who Trump was, is and will be. If he shows signs of losing it such that he is obviously incapable of being POTUS I'll be the first to admit. POTUS Vance is not something the left should want.

😂

Quack often likes the appeal to authority, referencing science from elite institutions as supporting his science as being the only science that should be followed. Funny that appeal didn't apply with the Quack cult when scientists from Stanford, Harvard and Oxford in OCTOBER OF 2020, released the Great Barrington Declaration and they were met with censorship on Twitter and elsewhere and had the Fauci and Collins working behind the scenes to undermine their message. Signed by 940,000+ scientists worldwide to date. The organizers of the Great Barrington Declaration were absolutely correct, and Jay Bhattacharya of Stanford is now NIH director. They were right. Quack and his deranged ilk were wrong. Suck it. https://gbdeclaration.org/ The Great Barrington Declaration – As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection. Coming from both the left and right, and around the world, we have devoted our careers to protecting people. Current lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health. The results (to name a few) include lower childhood vaccination rates, worsening cardiovascular disease outcomes, fewer cancer screenings and deteriorating mental health – leading to greater excess mortality in years to come, with the working class and younger members of society carrying the heaviest burden. Keeping students out of school is a grave injustice. Keeping these measures in place until a vaccine is available will cause irreparable damage, with the underprivileged disproportionately harmed. Fortunately, our understanding of the virus is growing. We know that vulnerability to death from COVID-19 is more than a thousand-fold higher in the old and infirm than the young. Indeed, for children, COVID-19 is less dangerous than many other harms, including influenza. As immunity builds in the population, the risk of infection to all – including the vulnerable – falls. We know that all populations will eventually reach herd immunity – i.e. the point at which the rate of new infections is stable – and that this can be assisted by (but is not dependent upon) a vaccine. Our goal should therefore be to minimize mortality and social harm until we reach herd immunity. The most compassionate approach that balances the risks and benefits of reaching herd immunity, is to allow those who are at minimal risk of death to live their lives normally to build up immunity to the virus through natural infection, while better protecting those who are at highest risk. We call this Focused Protection. Adopting measures to protect the vulnerable should be the central aim of public health responses to COVID-19. By way of example, nursing homes should use staff with acquired immunity and perform frequent testing of other staff and all visitors. Staff rotation should be minimized. Retired people living at home should have groceries and other essentials delivered to their home. When possible, they should meet family members outside rather than inside. A comprehensive and detailed list of measures, including approaches to multi-generational households, can be implemented, and is well within the scope and capability of public health professionals. Those who are not vulnerable should immediately be allowed to resume life as normal. Simple hygiene measures, such as hand washing and staying home when sick should be practiced by everyone to reduce the herd immunity threshold. Schools and universities should be open for in-person teaching. Extracurricular activities, such as sports, should be resumed. Young low-risk adults should work normally, rather than from home. Restaurants and other businesses should open. Arts, music, sport and other cultural activities should resume. People who are more at risk may participate if they wish, while society as a whole enjoys the protection conferred upon the vulnerable by those who have built up herd immunity. On October 4, 2020, this declaration was authored and signed in Great Barrington, United States, by: Dr. Martin Kulldorff, professor of medicine at Harvard University, a biostatistician, and epidemiologist with expertise in detecting and monitoring infectious disease outbreaks and vaccine safety evaluations. Dr. Sunetra Gupta, professor at Oxford University, an epidemiologist with expertise in immunology, vaccine development, and mathematical modeling of infectious diseases. Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, professor at Stanford University Medical School, a physician, epidemiologist, health economist, and public health policy expert focusing on infectious diseases and vulnerable populations.

Ridiculous takes that could only make Finding proud. EMBARRASSING

It ignores all the facts including the confirmed and undisputed fact that Trump authorized the call up of up to 10k national guard days before J6. It also ignores the fact the Trump cannot unilaterally mobilize the NG. His pre approval required the Capitol Sargent at arms or DC mayor to enter a lawful request to make it happen. We also have documentary proof in writing that both the Sargent at arms and DC mayor Boweser declined to make the necessary request to satisfy the lawful mobilization of the NG. This is the end of the story. It's just yet another example of HomeBillsLand***** living under a green sky. It's also another reason why everyone should ignore it.