BillsFanNC

What do you mean? The J6 committee looked into it, right? We've been told their only goal was getting to the truth... And to @SoCal Deek point..

If you watch the interview with Sund and all the firsts, anomalies and non sharing of key intelligence reports that he talks about, I think it's really hard to characterize it as a law enforcement failure, but instead as a complete set up.

Keep in mind this was only the requests denied while the Capitol was under attack on J6. Multiple requests for NG presence, already pre-approved for up to 20k troops by Trump, in the days before J6 were also denied.

🎯 Everyone, and I mean EVERYONE, who isn't a useful idiot needs to watch this. They fired Tucker in part so they wouldn't have to air the original interview. After you watch this new one you'll know why. Please watch this. There shouldn’t be 4M views, there should be 40M or 400M views. This interview is among the most powerful I’ve ever witnessed and I’ve witnessed or been part of Law Enforcement investigations and intelligence activities for decades. Thank you @TuckerCarlson for sitting down w/ Chief Sund. And thank you @elonmusk and @X for being a platform for the truth. We’re in trouble America and we better get it right (morally, legally, and politically) in the next year or so, otherwise, we’re done.

@John from Riverside Wrong again. Shocker. On January 6, even while we’re under attack, I was restricted by federal law (2 U.S. Code § 1970 Assistance by Executive departments and agencies) from bringing in federal assistance, to include the National Guard, without FIRST obtaining approval from the House and Senate Sergeants at Arms. (Irving was the House SAA. Stenger was the Senate SAA) Courage Under Fire p. 137: “Between 12:58 and when I finally receive approval for the National Guard at 2:09, I have made thirty-two calls to coordinate response support for my officers, including at least eleven calls to the sergeants at arms regarding my request for the National Guard.”

In the Tucker interview Sund says the intel Milley was getting in the weeks and days prior to J6 led him to consider SHUTTING DOWN ALL OF DC. So they have all this intel suggesting serious violence and they share none of it with the chief of Capitol police? Why? You know why.

Oh they're not joking. At all. Late stage TDS.

⬆️ HOAX

Well my response to this thread and bumping the tutorial thread was just a guess because.... I have @ChiGoose on IGNORE. Therefore I get absolutely zero of his content. Posts, NOTIFICATIONS, PM's. I only see what others quote, which is more than enough. How very King like of him to continue playing the victim due to a "problem" he's been given the keys to solve all on his own. But as we see once again, he's butthurt because I don't read all of his content. Waaaaaahhhhh. What an absolute moron. And for the record, I have substantially cut down on tagging him. Everything I tagged him on yesterday are topics that he has weighed in on or discussed previously with me. Keep clutching that crown tighter King!

Viral overnight sensation. Good for him.

Sounds like the most secure election in Belarus history to me...

🎯

@L Ron Burgundy He only drops in here occasionally, but if you weighted his contributions by grandiose stupidity per post, I think that he'd truly give the court jester @BillStime a run.

Oh yes, this too...