In-A-Gadda-Levitre

hehe, not surprised you picked this article. Okay, there were some and it's also not surprising that locals had remnants. I'm really curious how many mulligans you're willing to give General Powell, Hillary, Reid, Pelosi, etc. for basing their initial support on the intelligence given to them at the time?

Q: What does it mean when a hooker offers you the Mitt Romney special? A: For an extra $20 she'll change positions.

don't feed the troll

gee, I thought this thread was about who will win (and maybe some opinions about why), but find a bunch of crap about teleprompters...

funny comment...

Umm, I beg to differ. pro hace vice says that, if there's an MA licensed attorney on the docket, another attorney (that she-devil ) can appear before the federal court in MA, regardless if that person is licensed in MA or not. The real issue is probably whether she's allowed to use her law school address to practice law. That being the cases she is doing real work on, which given the detail in jacobson's post, wasn't a lot. I don't mean to infer that Edubya didn't do much work for Travelers, etc. More about it wasn't a lot of cases she'd worked on, in the years he pulled data for. Based on the personal opinion from the GC of the Boston bar, it might appear that the answer is - what she is using her office for is probably ok for now, as long as she doesn't take a caseload.

when I saw this video a few days ago, I thought the same thing, his neck is ripped

right-on bro

doubt if it tips the advantage, but Edelman is not practicing

ok, but 2010 was a mid-term election, so most pundits/pollsters/analysts/blowhards will tend to downplay 2010 and compare apples to apples.

the reprise of pro hac vice was based on the bolded quote, I wrongly assumed you bought into part of the blog post, but later I was really arguing with Mr Jacobson, not you...

I realize that, u idiot. Question: is !@#$ing half-wit trademark pending?

I'll admit, when I see a link posted as being Breitbart.com, hughhewitt.com, and the like, I don't bother looking at them, just like I'm sure you do the same when it's HuffPost or MSNBC. If you want to convince people (in this case those commie brainwashed libs), maybe try a less biased source. Just sayin'...

in Mort's vid on ESPN, the last thing he says is one of the officials involved in the negotiations told him that fitting the new Nike uniforms would be "kinda silly" as a reason why they wouldn't be ready this weekend...

maybe, but seems like it would work against the incumbent. I think you'd agree that rather than liking Romney as a candidate, many registered republicans and probably more than a few indies will vote for him because they hate Obama and will do just about anything to get him out of the WH. So, if I desperately want to oust the sitting president, I'm gonna make sure my vote counts. But maybe that's not the case...

because of this

this is the part I don't get. If all the pollsters (except Rasmussen) and media are in the tank for Obama, wouldn't that suppress voter turnout for the President, since he's already winning by such a large margin in the polls?

Mort says his sources indicate they're close to a deal

the general counsel for the Boston Board of Bar Overseers doesn't see it that way

one more time, the cases listed in the article are federal, so she can participate as pro hac vice.

Do you have enough of those drugs to share with everybody?

tweets ESPN's Matt Willamson

Powell isn't in camp anymore, he was released at the cutdown. The Jests tried him out, but didn't sign him. AFAIK, he's out of the NFL, but I guess the Bills could resign him.

because it butts heads with the earlier statement that if he paid more taxes than he was legally supposed to, he shouldn't be running for office, and feeds the impression that he has no core

most definitely Obama's, but the thread is discussing Mr R's tax rate and how it compares with (fill in the blank), not who broke a worse promise. Start a flip-flop or gaffe power ranking thread, and maybe you could win some serious cash.