BillsFan130

True to a certain degree. But It is a little strange the bills knew about about this in late July apparently, but still went with him over Haack. That is the strange part to me.

Yep exactly. Literally would have been a dark cloud media storm over a punter... The bills did the right thing IMO.

Haha ya I agree 100 percent. Knox is going to have a lot of leverage during contract negotiations, especially if he has another good year

I unfortunately don't think so based on his guaranteed money. I see him this year as an overpaid blocking tight end

Were the accusations this serious though? I don't recall the incidents with McCoy/Dodson so I'm not saying your wrong, just curious

Mac is a reasonable average QB IMO. The problem? I don't think his ceiling is that high. And when you have Josh Allen, Mahomes, burrow, Herbert, Rus Wilson in the same conference, you are going to need to play better than average.

Looks pretty similar. Playing a lot better than last year though..

Ya I noticed that as well.. That was like CFL rules, he had a running start haha

Fair points

I want to say Baltimore, but will take the best QB in the division and will say Bengals

Not all draft picks make the 53. But yes as a 5th round pick for a guy you traded up for, you would expect him to make the team.

They would be so screwed without him

You're sold on Matt Ryan at his current age? Not to say he won't be better than wentz. But he looked washed up last year to me. (I know he had a poor o line and not a ton of help for him) Just looked so immobile

But Such a classy organization with very humble fans, they don't deserve this!

https://buffalowdown.com/2022/06/09/buffalo-bills-hoping-splash-plays-tremaine-edmunds/amp/ yes sir, should be in here^

Frazier himself even said they need more splash plays from him. It's pretty objective that the guy needs to make more plays and I don't think anyone can really deny that.

Yes sir. Not to mention Dawkins and Taron as well as those guys had extensions done before their contracts expired.

And sorry, *tackles for loss as well for impact plays, So INT, TFL, sacks, forced fumbles, fumble recoveries, pass breaks up and batted balls. He had 13 total impact plays combined.... I don't understand how its even possible to have that low of a number for a starting MLB, neverthless for a guy who plays basically every snap.

They say the opposite, but why isn't he extended yet? They could have saved a lot of money on the cap also. Clearly they aren't sure of him either and they want to see more. (Beane always extends his core guys prior to a contract expiring, with the exception of Milano) Impact plays I define as sacks, INT, forced fumbles, fumble recoveries, pass break ups, batted balls. Want to know how many he had of that total? 13... I'm sorry but that's just unacceptable for a guy who plays every snap and is in the centre of the field.

Hahah oh whoops sorry buddy. well played then!

Hey fair enough, I just don't see it. I see a guy who's lost out there a lot of the time. And I see a guy who doesn't make impact plays. (That part is pretty objective and even the biggest Edmunds fans can't argue this one)

Yep. The only thing Edmunds fans can say is, "but he takes up so much space in the middle of the field, and he's a leader ". Or will cherry pick some stat like joe Marino did on that podcast. I say this with no disrespect to people as everyone is entitled to their opinion, but it just boggles my mind how people can watch Edmunds and think he's a good football player. The dude just doesn't make impact plays.

"Very good level" is extremely subjective, and that's the polarizing thing about Edmunds. I don't think he is anywhere close to "very good " and a lot of others feel the same way.

I like Joe marino, but he is extremely biased towards Edmunds. If i am not mistaken, he was part of his scouting region and he loved Edmunds/gave him a great draft review goiing into the NFL draft. He made some good points in the podcast, but it was extremely one sided. He is trying to correlate Edmunds with the bills great passing defence. But didn't bring up the facts they have 2 pro bowl safeties, one of the best corners in the game, one of the best slot corners in the game, AND didn't even mention that they are always in nickel... Cherry picked stats to make him look good, but didn't pick any stats that made him look bad,and just casually brought up some of his flaws... I love joe, but thought it was a very biased podcast.

Bingo. Been saying this all along. Basically picking up his 5th year option means, "he's ok, we would like to see more and he's got potential to get better ". If they truly thought he was the cornerstone player, he would have been extended already as you mentioned.