Jump to content

djp14150

Community Member
  • Posts

    3,836
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by djp14150

  1. 58 minutes ago, dma0034 said:

    Not true. The Bills could have the 21-24th from the Chiefs rn. Bills will either be 21st or have a later pick

    As it stands now 21-24 are the wild card playoff losers sorted by record, strength of schedule, then a coin flip.

     

    KC is one loser

    NO/CAR loser has 111 wins

    ATL has 10 wins, Rams 11.

     

    Buffalo has 9, jacksonville 10

     

    It looks like jacksonville has a weaker SoS than KC and KC is less than AztL.

     

    If Buffali loses....they draft 21, KC 22.

    If buffalo wins, then JAX drafts 21, KC 22, and BUF no lower than 25.

     

    Tennessee has a weaker SoS than buffali so the fact they are seed 5 over buffali seed 6, they would get to draft ahead of buffalo.

     

     

     

  2. 19 hours ago, djp14150 said:

    Oakland should be eliminated ate with the Miami loss.

     

    If oakland wins and ten and buf lose then ten get the WC be conference record.  Had miami won, then they would get 2nd then OAK get the WC because the beat both Ten and Mia.

     

     

    For buffalo now....

     

    The need a W and 

    1. BAL loss

    2. Both TEN and SD lose

     

    I expect all of BUF, SD, TEN, and BAL games to be at 425

     

    For Sunday night it could be either CAR/ATL or CIN/BAL game

    As I predicted....

  3. Oakland should be eliminated ate with the Miami loss.

     

    If oakland wins and ten and buf lose then ten get the WC be conference record.  Had miami won, then they would get 2nd then OAK get the WC because the beat both Ten and Mia.

     

     

    For buffalo now....

     

    The need a W and 

    1. BAL loss

    2. Both TEN and SD lose

     

    I expect all of BUF, SD, TEN, and BAL games to be at 425

     

    For Sunday night it could be either CAR/ATL or CIN/BAL game

  4. 17 hours ago, Jeff3 said:

    Does anyone else think Bills and Miami game has a shot to get switched to 4:25? It would put bills and chargers game at same time, even though Bills and Titans are scheduled to kick at same time. 

     

     

    It depends on what happens.

     

    If buffalo wins and btimore loses and Tennessee lose then the bills game likely goes to 425 and it could go to NBC.

     

    I think CBS would have patriots, Steelers, and jags playing at 1pm and Baltimore, and buffalo at 425.

     

    If jags and titans for division title then if that isn't on NBC it would be the 425 game.

     

    If San Diego wins and if lose then both at 425.  

     

    As of now the Carolina Atlanta game is in the lead for the NBC game.

    • Like (+1) 1
  5. 44 minutes ago, essential said:

    I listen to national sports talk all day at work.  When talking about Tyrod, most on-air personalities throw out all the stats that are favorable to Tyrod (low interceptions, QBR, etc).  A lot of people don’t think those stats give a true representation.

     

    Today, most of the national media seemed to think the benching was a mistake, again citing all the stats that many don’t feel tell the full picture.  Rodak seemed to get it, but he, like us, watch all the games, and the national media doesn’t.  Anyway, during the Russillo show today they were talking about the Tyrod benching and played an audio clip from MMQB's Andy Benoit (originally on the 9/26/2017 show, when we were 2-1 and had just beaten a Broncos team that we weren’t expected to beat).  I think these quotes sum up why Tyrod was benched.

     

    Andy Benoit:

    “There will never be a stat to capture throws that should be attempted that are not attempted, and when you put on the all 22 coaches film and you see how these plays are drawn up, every game more than any other QB in the league, Tyrod Taylor’s leaving guys open on the field un-attempted.  He’s not processing, he’s not seeing, he’s not a full field progression reader, and he’s also not an anticipation thrower, that’s a bad mix, you have to really simplify the offense and build around him.  Now, they put Taylor on the move a lot which slices the field in half, now he’s only reading half the field, that’s a very specific way to play though, and the more specific you are the easier you become to game plan against.  So my guess is they’re ganna keep their eyes very much open for a quarterback, not this season, but heading into the offseason and moving forward.”

     

    Then as a follow up on the Benoit clip, Todd McShay said:

    “And I can tell you one thing, nothing will drive an offensive staff crazier than seeing something that they drew up, an opportunity for big play, and your quarterback didn’t take advantage of it, and I think that’s part of what’s going on here, and exactly what he’s saying is that, they’re getting guys open, they’re scheming the right way, they’re doing things, and he’s not seeing it, and that drives you nuts, because it makes you look bad as a coordinator, and ultimately as a head coach.”

     

    And then Will Cain chimed in with this:

    “That doesn’t show up in the numbers, it won’t even show up on a casual viewing on a Sunday, you’ll only know that when you know the game plan and what’s supposed to be happening on each individual play.”

     

    I transcribed this myself so I might have missed a word or two here or there.  The information for the podcast is below, the entire segment is worth a listen.

     

    If you want to hear the entire discussion it’s hour one of today’s show (11/15/2017):

    http://www.espn.com/espnradio/podcast/archive/_/id/3028618

     

    Direct mp3 link:

    http://play.podtrac.com/espn-theryenrussilloshow/c.espnradio.com/audio/3425347/russillo_2017-11-15-141847.64k.mp3

     

    Andy Benoit quote: 15:22-16:24

    Full segment on Tyrod: 10:52-18:54

     

     

    Here is a problem to those arguments.... 

     

    1. What about past years ?  Is that how he processed plays in prior years???

     

    2. Was there a knife on his throat if he threw picks by taking vhsnces???

     

    3. He had woids, sammy and others he used to throw to. In game 3 he has only Clay snd McCoy from paSt seasons that he threw yo abd had built up some knowledge of there reads and timing.

     

    4. Defense knew they lost the receivers and with no deep threat they could cheat with 9 in the box playing the run, qb runs, and short passing.

     

    I could accept an argument of starting a rookie qb because they were playing against the firmer coach/of who knew tyrod.

     

    If they want to give him a trial...start with werk 13.

  6. They should have a rule in place about a receiver conceding they are down that would not be considered a fumble. If the play is on the ground and they put down the ball on the ground they are down. were they hit and knees down and the ball cvame out this would not be a fumble.

     

    If you had 3 defenders standing around you they could be standing waiting for you to get up so they can mug you.

  7. Bills will resign Benjamin.

     

     

    Benjamin had his 5th yr picked up by Carolina so he isn't someone to sign this offseason.

     

    People who say Benjamin is a true #1 are delusional.....

     

    true #1s are decent size of over 5 feeet tall and has speed

     

    Benjamin is bigger but is not that fast. because he is taller he can compete for long passes and outjump the CB

     

    deep threats are people you focus 2 people on because they can beat the one person with their speed.

     

    he is better than woods because of his height.

  8. Do this trade address a need in next year's draft?

    WR next year isn't as deep.

     

    Benjamin is under contract next year with 5th yr option picked up.

    Jones under contract.

     

    Jordan Mathews is a UFA in the offseason. I assume they would try to resign him.

     

    They still have 2 1st, 2 2nd, and a 3rd.

     

    Likely use those 5 picks on OL, DL, LB, DB, and QB not necessarily in that order.

  9. He is 6'1. Not exactly screaming size.

     

    1. No Davis hasn't

    2. Mattews has been better than Holmes. Plus you don't spend a 2nd round pick and give up on the player. Right now: Mattews, Benjamin, Jones are locked. Tate is there for Special Teams. Bills have Thompson, Holmes and can sign Streater. Holmes is expensable.

    3. I'd rather see John Miller than Ducasse.

    4. FullBacks aren't very important; plus the Bills have one pretending to be a backup RB right now

    He is 6'1. Not exactly screaming size.

     

    1. No Davis hasn't

    2. Mattews has been better than Holmes. Plus you don't spend a 2nd round pick and give up on the player. Right now: Mattews, Benjamin, Jones are locked. Tate is there for Special Teams. Bills have Thompson, Holmes and can sign Streater. Holmes is expensable.

    3. I'd rather see John Miller than Ducasse.

    4. FullBacks aren't very important; plus the Bills have one pretending to be a backup RB right now

    6-2 is size compared to most CBS and he has speed.

     

    The ideal combo or receiver is having watkins snd benjamin on the same team.

     

    I could ser Holmes being cut and demarcation being cut but who would be 3rd??? They can cut players prior to I think it's week 10 then resign them and then get the comp pick.

  10. Based on my understanding buffalo has to cut 3 free agents they signed yo get a 3rd round comp pick.

     

    The formula need to be adjusted to factor in where the player was drafted and how much they signed for.

     

     

    As for this trade it's now basically a 3rd and watkins for a 2nd, benjamin, and Gaines.

     

    Just remember Benjamin is a receiver with size, but not speed. WatKINS had both.

×
×
  • Create New...