TakeYouToTasker

That is the least of things you should be embarrassed about.

I’m struggling to think of anything more vapid that you could have said. Unsurprising from a person who sees racism under every rock, and atop every tree.

Imagine being this person.

Do you believe that people on average, or society today, is more or less racist than, let’s say... it was in 1950? To follow up, why do you think there are so many faked hate crimes?

He wants to be Colin Kaepernick. There’s money in the victimhood cottage industry. Again, I’ll keep on saying it: We‘ve reached a point where we’ve miseducated an entire generation of people to believe victimhood is social currency; while at the same time social progress has nearly eliminated racism. The result is that now racism must be manufactured to meet demand.

That’s why they want to tear down the statues. They want to destroy any traces of a European depiction.

And, as predicted, they are now coming for statues of Jesus, and stained glass windows depicting Him.

The voluntary binding together of groups of humans in order to better protect themselves, for one; and what sorts of group cohesion those social structures had. Beginning with small groups of maybe a dozen people of fewer, which is believed to have lasted for almost six million years, through the highly complex dynastic empires of today. The interactions of these individuals, and the different social orders, and different rule sets they would have collectively decided to live under In order to best serve the needs of their individual groups, to decide who could become part of their group, and how those rule sets grew into lore, oral history, and custom as those smaller packs eventually became larger tribes who adopted moralities consistent with the survival history of their people.

It’s not. I think you may have a misunderstanding. What would be your criticism?

Law breaking is not the same thing as anarchy. These people recognize the authority, which is why they are in rebellion against it.

How can this be if human social development disagrees with it?

It’s not anarchy, it’s a communist revolution. Anarchy is building a shed without a permit, or drinking raw milk sold to you by a neighbor in a non-State sanctioned currency without paying taxes, or hunting or fishing without a license.

How can you be diametrically opposed to the reality that human morality has changed throughout the course of human history? The entire concept of morality has been fluid throughout human‘s social development and levels of interaction over the last six million years or so. The introduction of modern religions designate a clear shift in moral attitudes, the Stoics and later the Enlightenment another, as the modern concepts of human freedom as a virtue didn‘t even exist until that point. And the reason they didn’t exist? Until that point life was too hard, and too brutal, for individuals to spend much, if any, time engaged in developing moral philosophy. Until Locke presented his argument, it was generally presumed that the proper moral order was that everyone existed under the absolute rule of a monarch who derived his power directly from the Divine. Believing that none of this is true is an outright rejection of the realities of human history.

It was always inevitable, Doc.

What economic demographic commits the most crime? Which of the following groups, ranked from most to least, require the most policing in order to work towards securing an environment free of criminal activity for their children and communities? Low crime, low-medium crime, medium crime, high-medium crime, high-crime?

I am. That’s the remaining area.

It’s completely unclear. Think about what I’m asking him.

One week in: The area known as CHAZ has shrunk from six city blocks to three city blocks and a park, as the CHAZtonians ceeded the area to allow for emergency vehicles to enter. They are actively negotiating to give back the remaining area with no resolution thus far.

So... were you plagiarizing because you‘re too dumb to come up with something (you thought) was so smart, or you believe you’re too smart to think up something so dumb? Which is it?

Of all the people to plagiarize, and take credit for their work as your own, you actually chose AOC... I am absolutely ***** stunned. Do you think you’re too dumb to come up with something (you view as) this smart to say, or do you believe that you are too smart to come up with something this dumb on your own? I honestly can’t assess which it is.

Exactly 1 Democrat who voted against the Civil Rights Act became a Republican. The “switcheroo” is revisionist pornographic fan fiction for leftists.

You have an unreasonable level of trust for authority structures which have been constructing ways to undermine you for at least 104 years. At least. I implore you to read: https://www.amazon.com/Image-Guide-Pseudo-Events-America/dp/0679741801/ref=nodl_

Soymolia. Antifastan.

I’m not offering my opinion. I’m telling you that’s how these people identify politically. They told you this themselves, in their own words. Some said they were Trotskyites, others actually defended gulags, some others said that once Bernie was in power that conservatives would probably need to spend time in re-education camps. Bernie himself is a Communist, not a Democratic Socialist. Look at his policy prescriptions. They don’t align with the policies of the Scandinavian nations. You’re talking about a man who vacationed in the Soviet Union, came back heaping praise, and then a few scant years ago lauded the policies of Hugo Chavez.

It is correct that some of the worst performing schools are those with the most funding. However, the solution offered by the left continues to be even more funding.