FireChan

Maybe we could throw Tommy Boy in there? Rex D is gonna kill it in 2016! Rob was the missing piece!

How many rings? March to Spillers 2k!

TT will never win this team a Super Bowl. He's not good enough. Backing into the playoffs with a great defense is an effort in futility.

Do you think GM's should make moves based on PR? Isn't that what you expected last year? How'd it go?

So it was a cherry picked stat. Lol If Romo gets hurt long term, we'll probably get a really good pick for a QB in 18. It's a win-win If you truly believe that, then Whaley would also get killed for missing the post season with TT, so what difference does it make?

3 of his last 5? Is that the meaningless stat you threw out because you aren't including his drive in season? I would take JP over TT to win? Link please?

https://twitter.com/mkmolnar/status/827389857999622144 Sign this man!

Just bad luck. Don't sweat it. Bring on Romo!

He's a temporary gap filler everywhere.

I suppose the theory is you trade him and his contract, and his contract includes the option that needs to be made a decision on by X.

The assumption is you trade him AND the option. Which the new team can exercise. Which I think is how it works.

None of that is guaranteed from the Bills.

Romo's agent or TT's? Driving up Romo demand may get the Bills to stick with TT.

Time to get in the back of the bus.

Nothing, but Denver certainly regretted that choice. Romo, QB at 10 and then BPA. Sign an RT in FA and we're going!

You wanna miss our SB run?

Yes!

A high second. It's still an upper pick on a QB. The way some around here talk, taking Cardale in the 4th means we don't need to take another.

Losing the SB is a result, WEO. That's what I guess you don't seem to understand.

I mean, it was unheard of for a team to spend 2 high picks on QB's back to back, but they got Cam and it didn't really matter what the rest of the league thought.

I guess the question is, is the Pats defense better with or without Jamie Collins. I say with. And in that case, the risk of shipping him off is that you have a less talented defense in the short term.

No one will question ditching high quality defensive players for future picks if their defensive play sucks in the Super Bowl? You sure about that? Because he let those guys go? Maybe not. But if Collins could've been the reason for one more big 3rd down stop that they don't get, or one big run etc etc, there's questions there to be asked. Talib being matched with CHJ on the Bronocs was absolutely a key reason for their defensive dominance. He had 6 passes defensed in the playoffs in 2015. You think Denver doesn't miss a beat without him? If the defensive performance suffers in the Super Bowl, questions will be raised about letting one of your best defensive players go for a 3rd round pick on a year he could have contributed. How can you argue otherwise? That's like saying if the Bills let TT go and the offense doesn't play as well in a game they need to make the postseason, Whaley wouldn't be criticized or at least openly questioned. That's ludicrous.

And if the Pats let up 38 to Matty Ice and lose in a shootout, he'll be criticized for placing long-term thinking over short-term victories. Collins and Jones are still good players. If the defense plays at a high level consistently without them, they're good moves. If they don't, doubts will creep. BB is still the best HC of all time either way, but he's fallible. Getting a unilateral "it was a good move because they made the Super Bowl like they've done 6 times before" is nonsense. Pay Revis, good move. Don't pay him, good move. Kinda stupid to think like that. Talib is still playing at a very high level and they let him go for a cheap Revis rental that they passed on only 1 year later. Would they have maybe done better in 2015 keeping Talib? Would the Broncos have been as good without Talib when they faced each other in the AFCCG?

That's what I thought.

Hey retard, I never said what I thought about the actual promises. Just that he's been following through with the majority of them.