So if we signed Peyton Manning, we could get a fourth for EJ, but if we didn't, we could get a first for EJ?
Peyton Manning, just living up to his name as a team-killer.
Then you aren't reading. Or comprehending.
Do you know how long it took to find out, and raise awareness of, the detrimental effects of heroin, or opioids in general?
Just because it's the best case scenario, doesn't mean you believe in it.
Best case scenario for my life is winning the lottery tomorrow. I don't believe it will happen.
I know its history. I don't know why that's relevant.
How can you prove there's not a "real danger" if "scientific studies haven't shown" much of anything?
The argument that "people have been using it forever" applied to heroin too.
My intention was to point out another "nice message board trick," which is the twisting of another's argument into an absolute or a "guarantee" in order to make your position sound more sensible. It can be done for any topic. It's especially apparent when the post he was semi-responding said nothing even close to what he stated.
Another personal attack.
Snide? He pointed out that we heard the same things about our two last QB's, and you took the leapt that he has "a life so miserable..."
The best part about this is that the defintion of "denigrate" is to criticize unfairly.
Show me where one person used the word guarantee. Or is this where we bastardize someone into an untenable position to prove that we're correct about something? Is that what we're going with now?