B-Man

Disreputable source. You should know better.

His claim of ignorance is laughable. During a Whitmer interview in 2020

KAROL MARKOWICZ IN APRIL: Democrats lit the ‘assassination culture’ fuse — now their silence equals violence. https://nypost.com/2025/04/08/opinion/democrats-lit-the-assassination-culture-fuse-now-their-silence-equals-violence/

Some Democrat Senators Now Believe Biden Suffered Cognitive Decline In a shocking report, POLITICO says that some Democratic senators have been convinced that Biden was deteriorating both physically and mentally while in office. https://twitchy.com/brettt/2025/05/15/politico-some-dem-senators-now-believe-biden-suffered-cognitive-decline-n2412871

While polls are polls, results matter — to the objective among us, that is, and Trump is delivering in historic fashion on the promises he made throughout the 2024 presidential campaign, which is also garnering more support for him as his promised actions continue to produce positive results. Democrats have been hardest hit. As Trump announced on Monday, the two superpowers agreed to lowering tariffs on each other's imported goods from well over 100 percent as they continue trade negotiations: We've achieved a total reset with China after productive talks in Geneva. Both sides now agree to reduce the tariffs imposed after April 2 to 10% for 90 days as negotiators continue on the larger structural issues. While I wouldn't call a 90-day pause a "total reset," both Trump and the ChiComs have made concessions; a significant indication that they'd like to achieve a lasting agreement — that is, at least if or until China cheats, as is its long history. https://redstate.com/mike_miller/2025/05/15/americans-optimism-about-personal-finances-soars-to-four-year-high-democrats-hardest-hit-n2189130

Where are all the "If Trump gets elected we will be the laughingstock of the world" posters ? Arab World Rolls Out Red Carpet for President Trump Ward Clark https://redstate.com/wardclark/2025/05/15/arab-world-rolls-out-red-carpet-for-president-trump-n2189140

Opinions on tariffs aside, the framing of these stories is interesting to me. Under the Biden inflation, media painted corporations as greedy and needlessly raising prices to gouge consumers. Now they are portrayed as helpless victims just trying to survive. https://x.com/Nessakins_/status/1923034127357391206

Where are all the "If Trump gets elected we will be the laughingstock of the world" posters ? . .

RFK Jr. Goes Scorched Earth on Democrat Medicaid Lies

Justice Thomas Destroys the Case for Nationwide Injunctions With One Devastating Question Matt Margolis During Supreme Court oral arguments in the Trump v. CASA, Washington, and New Jersey cases, Justice Clarence Thomas delivered a surgical takedown of the legal rationale for nationwide injunctions, using just one line. The case centers around whether lower courts can issue sweeping injunctions that block federal policies nationwide, even when only a handful of plaintiffs are before the court. Representing the United States, Solicitor General D. John Sauer argued that such broad orders violate established legal norms and Supreme Court precedent. “We believe that the best reading of that is what you said in Trump against Hawaii, which is that Wirtz in 1963 was really the first universal injunction,” Sauer told the Court. “There’s a dispute about Perkins against Lukens Oil going back to 1940. And of course, we point to the Court’s opinion that reversed that universal injunction issued by the D.C. Circuit and said it’s profoundly wrong.” Sauer continued, listing key precedents that have rejected expansive injunctive relief. “If you look at the cases that either party cite, you see a common theme. The cases that we cite — like National Treasury Employees Union, Perkins, Frothingham, and Massachusetts v. Mellon, going back to Scott v. Donald — in all of those, those are cases where the Court considered and addressed the sort of universal — well, in that case, statewide — provision of injunctive relief.” He emphasized, “When the Court has considered and addressed this, it has consistently said, ‘You have to limit the remedy to the plaintiffs appearing in court and complaining of that remedy.’” That’s when Justice Thomas stepped in and cut through the legal weeds with a devastatingly simple observation. “So we survived until the 1960s without universal injunction?” he asked. Sauer didn’t hesitate: “That’s exactly correct. And in fact, those were very limited, very rare, even in the 1960s.” He went on to explain that nationwide injunctions didn’t truly explode until 2007. “In our cert petition in Summers v. Rhode Island Institute, we pointed out that the Ninth Circuit had started doing this in a whole bunch of cases involving environmental claims.” Thomas’s concise question — “So we survived until the 1960s without universal injunction?” — hit the heart of the issue. With that simple question, he challenged the idea that such drastic judicial remedies were historically essential, even during one of the most tumultuous and morally urgent periods in American history: the civil rights era, a time when federal courts began issuing broader remedies to dismantle Jim Crow laws and enforce desegregation. https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2025/05/15/justice-thomas-destroys-case-for-nationwide-injunctions-with-one-devastating-question-n4939815

You've chosen to ignore content by Homelander. Options You've chosen to ignore content by Homelander. Options You've chosen to ignore content by Homelander. Options You've chosen to ignore content by Homelander. Options You've chosen to ignore content by Homelander. Options You've chosen to ignore content by Homelander. Options You've chosen to ignore content by Homelander. Options You've chosen to ignore content by Homelander. Options

.