B-Man

After decades of propaganda, the people are NOT fooled.

Joe is assuming again. He KNOWS what the "average MAGA" is like, don't you know. . .

The lefties will hang Mike Pence ? Just kidding, i know that you are just doing the typical, what about the right B.S. LOL .

.

Good move by the 'handlers'

Back when Joe Biden was still the person at the top of the Democrat reelection ticket, the campaign offered Ukraine President Zelenskyy a suggestion for how he could give their November hopes a boost. More recently Zelenskyy had criticism for Trump running mate JD Vance Normally this would just be remarks about politics, but it looks like the White House has decided to try and use Zelenskyy to provide them with a boost in a swing state, all on the U.S. taxpayers' dime. Guess who's back in the U.S., and also guess where the White House flew him to for a visit. Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro was also there: Yes, it does raise some serious questions. "Journalists" might not ask them, but somebody needs to (we won't hold our breath). https://twitchy.com/dougp/2024/09/23/wait-the-wh-used-taxpayer-dollars-to-fly-zelenskyy-to-a-swing-state-after-slamming-jd-vance-n2401316

Just a couple of reminders as you read this post and poll: Kamala Harris MUST WIN Arizona. This Arizona poll comes from the New York Times.

RESULTS ?? Here's How Far Down the Road to WWIII Biden-Harris Has Taken Us Stephen Green If there is a Third World War, historians will note that — like the First — it began with weak and unimaginative leadership and in the unlikeliest of places. No one could have known that an assassin's bullets in Sarajevo on June 28, 1914, would begin a monthslong march to a global war from which Europe has not (and never will) culturally recover. If we're sliding into another global war, historians will write that the years-long march began in Kabul, Afghanistan on Aug. 15, 2021. How did we get here? It all started with cold, hard cash. Almost as soon as Presidentish Joe Biden assumed office, he began making sure that bad actors around the world would have all the money they might need for acting badly. Less than one month into his solitary, sad little term, Biden lifted former president Donald Trump’s restoration of U.N. sanctions on Iran. The White House and the State Steno Pool sold the move as something that "could help Washington move toward rejoining the 2015 nuclear agreement aimed at reining in the Islamic Republic’s nuclear program." Trump had withdrawn from Barack Obama's "Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, or JCPOA, in 2018, accusing Iran of serious violations." Trump had Iran broke and boxed in. Biden unleashed the Kraken. But Biden wasn't done there. At seemingly every opportunity, he freed up more funds for Tehran. To give just one specific example, last year Biden-Harris unfroze $6 billion-with-a-b in Iranian funds to secure the release of five (!!!) Americans who were effectively held hostage by Iran's "justice" system. "To facilitate their release," SecState Antony Blinken said at the time, "the United States has committed to release five Iranian nationals currently held in the United States and to permit the transfer of approximately $6 billion in restricted Iranian funds held in [South Korea] to restricted accounts in Qatar, where the funds will be available only for humanitarian trade." {snip} In between Biden-Harris dropping one match after another around the Middle East powder keg and that region exploding, full-scale war came to Europe for the first time since the end of the Second World War. Russia's partial invasion of Ukraine on Obama's watch in 2014 — Obama sent blankets, not antitank missiles — ended with one spectacular success and one frustrating thorn in Vladimir Putin's side. His illegal seizure of Crimea was a textbook example of hybrid warfare. "Little green men" — Russian special forces, mostly, acting without Russian military insignia — took control of everything important in Crimea in very short order, presenting the world with a fait accompli that appears unlikely to be undone. The same was supposed to happen in Ukraine's east, where ethnic-Russian partisans (acting as Moscow's proxies) would do the same in the Donbas. Unexpectedly spirited — and often ad hoc — resistance from Ukraine led to an eight-year stalemate, frequently punctuated by gunfire and artillery. Putin tried to bluster and threaten his way into getting the rest of eastern Ukraine, including massive military maneuvers at or near the border. But he did not invade on Trump's watch. "I think what you're going to see is that Russia will be held accountable if it invades," Biden said in January 2022, about a month before the war. "And it depends on what it does. It's one thing if it's a minor incursion and then we end up having a fight about what to do and not do." Biden signaled indecision instead of resolve. The White House tried to undo the damage the next day, with PressSec Jen Psaki warning, "If any Russian military forces move across the Ukrainian border, that's a renewed invasion, and it will be met with a swift, severe, and united response from the United States and our allies." But the damage was done. The signal had been sent. A mere worker-bee with a penchant for quarter-truths like Psaki carried no weight in the Kremlin. Nor should it have, not after Biden had enriched Moscow with actions like de-sanctioning the Nord Stream 2 pipeline. A last-ditch effort to secure the peace by sending Harris and Blinken to the Munich Security Conference in February 2022 would have been comically inept had the stakes not been so high. At the time, CNN called the Munich conference "the most critical foreign trip of her vice presidency," but no one in the State Steno Pool seems to care much that she flubbed it now that she's the Democrat nominee. "Let me be clear," Harris said at Munich, "I can say with absolute certainty: If Russia further invades Ukraine, the United States, together with our Allies and partners, will impose significant and unprecedented economic costs." https://pjmedia.com/vodkapundit/2024/09/23/heres-how-far-down-the-road-to-wwiii-biden-harris-has-taken-us-n4932754 .

What will Lefties do on Nov 6 after Trump wins? .

Volodymyr Zelensky has joined the growing list of foreigners campaigning for Kamala Harris. No doubt the media mavens of the transnational elite will call for immediate impeachment of Harris for her collusion with Zelensky to interfere in our election. Yeah, right. Sure, it's true that Joe Biden and Kamala Harris have been funneling uncounted billions into Ukraine and that much of that money has been sucked up by corrupt politicians and their buddies, But this is the right sort of corruption, so nobody in the Establishment is bothered by it at all. The idea that Ukraine has shielded the West from Russian aggression is absurd. That is a talking point, not a serious analysis. I have a very pragmatic view of the Ukraine war: if supporting the war helps the US, then we should do it; if it doesn't, then we shouldn't. Ukraine is no longer in danger of being swallowed by Russia, so our war aims to prevent this has been achieved. Russia presents no threat to NATO militarily now, if it ever did in the past decade or two, and the last thing we need is to admit the corrupt country into the alliance. Zelensky is here to propose precisely that, among other things. To which I say NO! The last thing we need is to threaten World War III over Ukrainian borders. We have open borders right here to close. https://hotair.com/david-strom/2024/09/23/shut-up-vl-n3794889

Yikes: Kamala's Confused Comment About Trump Shows Why They Don't Want Her Answering Questions By Nick Arama Kamala Harris proved again on Sunday why her team doesn't seem to like having her take questions. Usually when she's traveling back and forth, you see her running from the car to the plane and completely blowing off the press that might be waiting there, hoping to slip in a question. But for some reason, on Sunday, the press managed to get in at least a couple of queries when she was traveling to New York. It did not go well. https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2024/09/22/kamalas-comments-about-trump-n2179648

Cope Flows Like Milk and Honey After Trump Sees Huge Gains in Three Key Battleground States Donald Trump has rebounded in three key swing states, according to the latest polling conducted by The New York Times and Siena. The former president now leads by five points in Arizona, four in Georgia, and two in North Carolina. {snip} As I showed above, the claim that "NYT polling" has been "3-4 pts more R" is not true. Their polling favored Harris during its last round. MSNBC's "Morning Joe" also tried to dismiss the results on Monday, claiming that Times/Siena showed Mitt Romney was going to blow out Barack Obama. The problem? There was no Times/Siena poll in 2012. Going back to my first point, you do not analyze polls by dismissing those that go against your narratives. The moment you start doing that, you are just guessing at who may or may not have a polling error in the current cycle. Don't like the result of a survey? Throw it in the average, but saying "but Morning Consult" isn't an argument. Times/Siena is also Nate Silver's top-rated pollster. https://redstate.com/bonchie/2024/09/23/cope-flows-after-trump-sees-huge-gains-in-three-key-battleground-states-n2179653

I HAVE IT ON GOOD AUTHORITY WE’RE ROSARY EXTREMISTS! Catholic voters at forefront of Pennsylvania election battle as ads target Democrats for ‘bigotry’. Traditionally a Democratic-leaning group, Catholics have increasingly shifted toward the GOP in recent years and that constituency appears likely to prove critical in the key battleground of Pennsylvania, where they constitute nearly a quarter of the population in the narrowly divided state. Catholics represent roughly 24% of Pennsylvanians, according to the Pew Research Center. In 2020, Pennsylvania broke for President Joe Biden, a Catholic, over Trump. It previously backed the Republican in 2016 over Clinton. Now, with the state so narrowly divided, both the Trump campaign and conservative groups seem to see the value in courting Catholic voters. https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/fricatholic-voters-forefront-pa-races-ads-target-dems-anti-catholic-bigotry?

KAMALA IN TROUBLE: Undecided Black Voters In Georgia Deliver Brutal Responses When Asked for Their Thoughts on Harris. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/09/kamala-trouble-undecided-black-voters-georgia-deliver-brutal/

The ‘Common Sense’ Gun Law Democrats Don’t Want to Talk About. Kamala Harris loves to trot out her talking points about her gun control proposals in campaign appearances, which inevitably include her description of them as “common sense”. According to Harris, it’s just common sense to ban the most popular rifles in the country (though she’s now silent on whether its also common sense to include a compensated confiscation component to her gun ban scheme). It’s also common sense, at least to Harris, to mandate background checks on every private transfer of a firearm, even temporarily or if the seller is well aware that the buyer isn’t prohibited from possessing or purchasing a gun. Waiting periods? Common sense. Gun rationing laws? Common sense. Magazine bans? Common sense. Whatever a gun control activist is proposing, they’re sure to tell us that it’s only common sense. There is, however, one policy that seems perfectly reasonable to me (and I would argue, most Americans) that Democrats are largely unwilling to get behind: increasing the penalty for stealing a gun or possessing a stolen firearm. https://bearingarms.com/camedwards/2024/09/22/the-common-sense-gun-law-democrats-dont-want-to-talk-about-n1226304 Going after actual criminals would cut into one of the Democrats’ core constituencies.

MORE CRUSHING OF DISSENT: School calls cops on parents wearing ‘XX’ wristbands to protest male player on girls team: Superintendent: bands were ‘threatening, harassing, intimidating.’ A New Hampshire high school called the cops on several parents who showed up at a girls soccer game wearing wristbands with “XX” on them. The two Xs, which signify women’s chromosomes, were to protest the participation of a biological male on Bow High School rival Plymouth Regional HS’s team. According to NH Journal, parents had asked the Bow High athletic director to do something about the situation ahead of time, but he noted his hands were tied “in the wake of a federal judge’s ruling that the term ‘girl’ includes males who identify as female.” As a result, the parents engaged in a silent protest by wearing the wristbands at the game. Upon seeing the parents’ “XX” bands, however, school officials not only stopped the soccer match, they told the parents to remove the wristbands and “issued [a] police-enforced ‘No Trespassing order'” against two of them. https://www.thecollegefix.com/school-calls-cops-on-parents-wearing-xx-wristbands-to-protest-male-player-on-girls-team/ Leftists love to pretend that disagreement is somehow violence. As a friend says, anyone who thinks words are violence has never been punched in the nose.

Nope. YOU deciding who you will read or not is EXACTLY what I said. You still speak against what those on the right say, without daring to read it. . . . . . . . . hypocrite much? Meanwhile back at the thread topic: What will Lefties do on Nov 6 after Trump wins? Well, we have historical precedent, January 20th 2017 .

The obvious, pathetic reason Kamala Harris will skip the Al Smith dinner Ouch: It seems Kamala Harris is so afraid of having to be spontaneous in public, she’s skipping this year’s Al Smith dinner on Oct. 17. A charity event that raises millions for the city’s unfortunate, the dinner has hosted the major-party rivals every four years (with just two exceptions) since 1960, when Richard Nixon dared to join John Kennedy, the first Catholic presidential nominee since Al Smith himself, on Catholic “turf.” The candidates are supposed to deliver light jabs at each other in their dueling addresses, which plainly can be written in advance — but the program apparently has too many risks of being called upon for spontaneous reactions for Harris to agree. https://nypost.com/2024/09/22/opinion/the-obvious-pathetic-reason-kamala-harris-will-skip-the-al-smith-dinner/

"We can't afford four more years of this," Walz said. Wait, what? Who's occupying the White House right now, Tim? Who's been responsible for all this tumult? Hint: it isn't Trump. It's why we're voting for Trump and JD Vance. Exactly because we "can't afford four more years of this." We can't afford any more of what Harris and Joe Biden have wrought. It also sounds like he might have just created that next ad for the Trump campaign. Trump should run this around the clock, showing how inflation is up, how grocery prices are up, how the border problems are up, how world chaos is up--all because of Kamala Harris and Joe Biden. Biden wore a Trump hat, and now we get this. The Harris-Walz team is really terrible at this.

Every time I think that you cannot come up with a funnier reply, you do. This is exactly what you folks do. You even gloat about how you don't read Conservative news and belittle their authors. Yet you claim to know every thought and motive of the right.